Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 23:25 UTC

SnowdogApps / magento2-menu

Provides powerful menu editor to replace category based menus in Magento 2

JavaScript · PHPMIT★ 331 stars⑂ 119 forkssince Jun 2017View on GitHub ↗

SnowdogApps/magento2-menu holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (26/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SnowdogOrganization
35 followers127 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistsnowdog/module-menu2.29.042,21655376 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
11.7/18Commit volume19 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year19
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 231 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~92.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tag2.29.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release231
mean_days_between_releases92.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.9/60Stars331 stars
17.3/25Forks119 forks
7.5/15Watchers23 watchers
Inputs used
forks119
stars331
watchers23
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.7/80Monthly downloads42,216 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20Registry dependents5 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagessnowdog/module-menu
dependents5
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,837,771
monthly_downloads42,216
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth55 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled55
top_contributor_share0.453
How it's scored
38.9/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance184/217 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs184
open_issues13
closed_issues161
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.925
closed_unmerged_prs33
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.2/25Owner reach35 followers of SnowdogApps
25/25Track record127 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers35
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginSnowdogApps
public_repos127
account_age_days5,151
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 376 days ago
20/20Version history55 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessnowdog/module-menu
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish376

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshacktoberfest, extenstions, menus, magento2, magento2-module, menu, snowdog-hyva
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages3
assessed_packages112
unassessed_packages9
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 112 resolved dependencies against OSV. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

26At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
54/55Manageable file sizes3/167 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes342,146
source_files_sampled167
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)etc/schema.graphqls
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesetc/schema.graphqls
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

331GitHub stars
55contributors
19commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
24releases
2bus factor
13open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 23:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests6 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 5/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistmagento/framework100.1.*|101.0.*|102.0.*|103.0.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-catalog101.0.*|102.0.*|103.0.*|104.0.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-cms101.0.*|102.0.*|103.0.*|104.0.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-backend100.1.*|100.2.*|101.0.*|102.0.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-graph-ql100.3.*|100.4.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-import-export100.3.*|101.0.*composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-media-storage100.3.*|100.4.*composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml>=3.2composer.json
All dependencies 121

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 113 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistmagento/frameworkdirect
Packagistmagento/module-backenddirect
Packagistmagento/module-catalogdirect
Packagistmagento/module-cmsdirect
Packagistmagento/module-graph-qldirect
Packagistmagento/module-import-exportdirect
Packagistmagento/module-media-storagedirect
Packagistsymfony/yamldirect
npm@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap1.2.6indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.6.2indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.0indirect
npm@eslint/js8.44.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.10indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema1.2.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@types/color-name1.1.1indirect
npmacorn8.10.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.2.1indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.45.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue9.15.1indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.1indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.1indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.2.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.0.4indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.1.6indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.20.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.13indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.1.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.5.4indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.1.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmuri-js4.2.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvue-eslint-parser9.3.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmxml-name-validator4.0.0indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Packagistmagento/magento-coding-standardindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 112 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh35.0.7
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh24.3.0
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.