Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 12:29 UTC

SocketDev / socket-packageurl-js

purl spec implementation for JavaScript

TypeScriptMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Apr 2024forkView on GitHub ↗

SocketDev/socket-packageurl-js holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SocketOrganization · verified domain

839 followers55 public repossince Aug 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@socketregistry/packageurl-js	1.5.2	76,787	35	40 days ago	socket.dev package-overrides

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
9/36	Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 655 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	655
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	13

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 41 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	7
latest_release_tag	v1.5.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	41
mean_days_between_releases	0.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical

How it's scored

4.9/60	Stars — 3 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	3
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

81Excellent

How it's scored

65.1/80	Monthly downloads — 76,787 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@socketregistry/packageurl-js
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	76,787
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	16
top_contributor_share	0.932

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.2/30	PR acceptance — 63/78 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	63
open_issues	0
closed_issues	10
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	15
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
21/25	Owner reach — 839 followers of SocketDev
24.7/25	Track record — 55 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	839
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	SocketDev
public_repos	55
account_age_days	2,230

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20	Version history — 35 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@socketregistry/packageurl-js
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	6
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	178
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 178 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40	Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	28,892

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
52.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/19 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	150,848
source_files_sampled	19
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

3GitHub stars

16contributors

655commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

7releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10

5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 12:29 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 178 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@pacquet/darwin-arm64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pacquet/darwin-x64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pacquet/linux-arm64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pacquet/linux-x64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pacquet/win32-arm64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pacquet/win32-x64	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.android-arm64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.android-x64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.darwin-x64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.freebsd-x64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-ppc64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-riscv64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-s390x	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-x64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.win32-arm64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe.win32-x64	`12.4.1`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/pacquet	`0.11.2`	indirect
npm	pnpm	`12.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	ast-grep-cli	`0.42.3`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	blockbuster	`1.5.26`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.4.22`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.5.20`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	cloudpickle	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coloredlogs	`15.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	croniter	`6.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi	`0.136.3`	indirect
PyPI	fastuuid	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.1`	indirect
PyPI	flatbuffers	`25.12.19`	indirect
PyPI	forbiddenfruit	`0.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	fsspec	`2026.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.75.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio	`1.78.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-health-checking	`1.78.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-tools	`1.78.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h2	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	headroom-ai	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	hf-xet	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	hpack	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	huggingface-hub	`1.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	humanfriendly	`10.0`	indirect
PyPI	hyperframe	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.33`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-rs	`0.44.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-core	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-openai	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-protocol	`0.0.15`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-api	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-checkpoint	`4.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-cli	`0.4.26`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-prebuilt	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-runtime-inmem	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-sdk	`0.3.15`	indirect
PyPI	langsmith	`0.8.18`	indirect
PyPI	litellm	`1.88.1`	indirect
PyPI	magika	`1.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mcp	`1.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mpmath	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.2.6`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	onnxruntime	`1.23.2`	indirect
PyPI	onnxruntime	`1.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	openai	`2.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	openai	`2.41.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.41.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.42.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	`1.41.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	`1.41.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`1.41.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.41.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.62b1`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.9`	indirect
PyPI	ormsgpack	`1.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`6.33.6`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.35.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyreadline3	`3.5.6`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.5.9`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	safetensors	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	skillspector	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	socket-headroom-pin	`0.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	socket-skillspector-pin	`0.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sqlite-vec	`0.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	structlog	`25.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	sympy	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	tiktoken	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	tokenizers	`0.22.2`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.67.3`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.68.2`	indirect
PyPI	transformers	`5.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.23.2`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uuid-utils	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.47.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.49.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	xxhash	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	yara-python	`4.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.24.2`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 178 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
h2	`4.3.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`4.4.1`
langgraph-api	`0.8.7`	indirect	moderate	4	`0.10.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records