Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-17 07:34 UTC

Spatial-NVR / SpatialNVR

Go · TypeScript · HTMLMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

Spatial-NVR/SpatialNVR holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (80/100) and lowest on Security (1/100). It was last updated 220 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Spatial-NVROrganization
0 followers4 public repossince Dec 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/Spatial-NVR/SpatialNVRv0.0.59-77221 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

47Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 220 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume181 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year181
human_commit_share0.62
days_since_last_push220
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases70 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 220 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count70
latest_release_tagv0.0.60-api
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release220
mean_days_between_releases0.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
0/25Owner reach0 followers of Spatial-NVR
6.4/25Track record4 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginSpatial-NVR
public_repos4
account_age_days233
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 221 days ago
20/20Version history77 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Spatial-NVR/SpatialNVR
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish221

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

1Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
manifestsdetection-service/requirements-coral.txt, detection-service/requirements-gpu.txt, detection-service/requirements-openvino.txt, detection-service/requirements.txt, e2e/package.json, go.mod, web-ui/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history60 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.968
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,390
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingweb-ui/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice60 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsweb-ui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.6
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes2/183 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes77,029
source_files_sampled183
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)internal/proto/detection.proto
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesinternal/proto/detection.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
181commits, last 12 months
220days since last push
70releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'nvr-e2e-tests' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (2026/08/17 07:33:43 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmplaywright^1.57.0e2e/package.json
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/corsv1.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.32go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2v2.10.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats.gov1.38.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.60.0web-ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.0web-ui/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1web-ui/package.json
npmframer-motion^11.11.0web-ui/package.json
npmhls.js^1.6.15web-ui/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.460.0web-ui/package.json
npmreact^18.3.1web-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.3.1web-ui/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.0.0web-ui/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.5.4web-ui/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.0web-ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.