Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 13:28 UTC

SunilWang / node-os-utils

OS Utils - An operating system utility library.

TypeScriptMIT★ 136 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗

SunilWang/node-os-utils holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sunil WangPersonal account
34 followers50 public repossince Jan 2015北京五八信息技术有限公司

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume71 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year71
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases29 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~224 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv3.1.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases224
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.6/60Stars136 stars
10.3/25Forks18 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars136
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads1,138,500 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnode-os-utils
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,138,500
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.946
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
19.1/30PR acceptance14/22 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs14
open_issues0
closed_issues30
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.1/25Owner reach34 followers of SunilWang
24.4/25Track record50 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginSunilWang
public_repos50
account_age_days4,271
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history32 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnode-os-utils
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.cjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/node-os-utils
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/node-os-utils
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/node-os-utils
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.4/40Legible commit history49 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.495
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.cjs
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.07
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/71 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes48,978
source_files_sampled71
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

136GitHub stars
7contributors
71commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
29releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OSV advisory lookup failed: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201832018-052020-122023-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 13

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 13:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 206

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 206 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.13.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.3indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@istanbuljs/schema0.1.6indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@types/chai4.3.20indirect
npm@types/istanbul-lib-coverage2.0.6indirect
npm@types/mocha10.0.10indirect
npm@types/node12.20.55indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys7.18.0indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.4.0indirect
npmacorn8.18.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.3.0indirect
npmansi-sequence-parser1.1.3indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.18indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmc810.1.3indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchai4.3.10indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.3indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-eql4.1.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff9.0.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.1indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.20.3indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.4.4indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.2indirect
npmjs-yaml5.4.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.3.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmloupe2.3.7indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmarked4.3.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha12.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreaddirp5.1.1indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.1.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmshiki0.14.7indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments5.0.3indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtest-exclude7.0.1indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils1.4.3indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-detect4.1.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypedoc0.25.13indirect
npmtypescript5.4.5indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmv8-to-istanbul9.3.0indirect
npmvscode-oniguruma1.7.0indirect
npmvscode-textmate8.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmworkerpool10.0.3indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.3indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: OSV advisory lookup failed: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.