Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 09:56 UTC

SwissLife-OSS / squadron

A testing framework for containerized and cloud services

C#MIT★ 108 stars⑂ 17 forkssince Aug 2019View on GitHub ↗

SwissLife-OSS/squadron holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Security (48/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Swiss Life OSSOrganization
33 followers48 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSquadron.Core1.1.2-400 days agoxunitswisslifecontainertestingazureintegrationtesttestdatabasetestmessagingtestdatabasemessagingservicebus

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume15 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases98 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count98
latest_release_tag1.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases26.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.9/60Stars108 stars
10/25Forks17 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks17
stars108
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
63/80Total downloads1,158,583 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSquadron.Core
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,158,583
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.294
How it's scored
20.4/42Issue resolution49% of issues closed
23.9/30PR acceptance105/132 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues18
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.486
closed_unmerged_prs27
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11/25Owner reach33 followers of SwissLife-OSS
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginSwissLife-OSS
public_repos48
account_age_days3,941

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history40 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSquadron.Core
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://swisslife-oss.github.io/squadron/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstesting, net, cloud, squadron, database-testing, messaging-testing, containers, integration-testing, system-testing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://swisslife-oss.github.io/squadron/
docs_sitehttps://swisslife-oss.github.io/squadron/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0.5/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history94 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.94
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapall.csproj, samples/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.Sample.csproj, samples/Compose/Compose.Sample.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsall.csproj, samples/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.Sample.csproj, samples/Compose/Compose.Sample.csproj, samples/GenericResource/GenericResource.Sample.csproj, samples/MongoDb/MongoDb.Sample.csproj, samples/PostgreSql/PostgreSql.Sample.csproj, samples/RabbitMQ/RabbitMQ.Sample.csproj, samples/Redis/Redis.Sample.csproj, samples/Shared/Shared.csproj, src/AzureCloud/AzureCloud.csproj, src/AzureCloudEventHub/AzureCloudEventHub.csproj, src/AzureCloudKeyVault.Core/AzureCloudKeyVault.Core.csproj, src/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.csproj, src/AzureStorage/AzureStorage.csproj, src/ClickHouse/ClickHouse.csproj, src/Compose/Compose.csproj, src/Core/Core.csproj, src/Elasticsearch/Elasticsearch.csproj, src/FtpServer/FtpServer.csproj, src/Gitea/Gitea.csproj, src/MariaDB/MariaDB.csproj, src/Mongo/Mongo.csproj, src/MySql/MySql.csproj, src/Nats/Nats.csproj, src/Neo4j/Neo4j.csproj, src/PostgreSql/PostgreSql.csproj, src/RabbitMQ/RabbitMQ.csproj, src/RavenDB/RavenDB.csproj, src/Redis/Redis.csproj, src/S3/S3.csproj, src/SFtpServer/SFtpServer.csproj, src/SqlServer/SqlServer.csproj, src/Typesense/Typesense.csproj, test/AzureCloudEventHub.Tests/AzureCloudEventHub.Tests.csproj, test/AzureCloudKeyVault.Tests/AzureCloudKeyVault.Tests.csproj, test/AzureCloudServiceBus.Tests/AzureCloudServiceBus.Tests.csproj, test/AzureStorage.Tests/AzureStorage.Tests.csproj, test/ClickHouse.Tests/ClickHouse.Tests.csproj, test/Compose.Tests/Compose.Tests.csproj, test/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj, test/Elasticsearch.Tests/Elasticsearch.Tests.csproj, test/FtpServer.Tests/FtpServer.Tests.csproj, test/Gitea.Tests/Gitea.Tests.csproj, test/MariaDB.Tests/MariaDB.Tests.csproj, test/Mongo.Tests/Mongo.Tests.csproj, test/MySql.Tests/MySql.Tests.csproj, test/Nats.Tests/Nats.Tests.csproj, test/Neo4j.Tests/Neo4j.Tests.csproj, test/PostgreSql.Tests/PostgreSql.Tests.csproj, test/RabbitMQ.Tests/RabbitMQ.Tests.csproj, test/RavenDB.Tests/RavenDB.Tests.csproj, test/Redis.Tests/Redis.Tests.csproj, test/S3.Tests/S3.Tests.csproj, test/SFtpServer.Tests/SFtpServer.Tests.csproj, test/SqlServer.Tests/SqlServer.Tests.csproj, test/Typesense.Tests/Typesense.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/215 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes13,779
source_files_sampled215
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

108GitHub stars
21contributors
15commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
98releases
3bus factor
18open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 17 ⇿
0Stars
17Forks
70Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201722019-112022-102025-10
Major 0Minor 20Patch 9

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 09:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
2CI-Tests8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBussrc/AzureCloud/AzureCloud.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectorysrc/AzureCloud/AzureCloud.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutablesrc/AzureCloud/AzureCloud.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.EventHubssrc/AzureCloudEventHub/AzureCloudEventHub.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.EventHubsrc/AzureCloudEventHub/AzureCloudEventHub.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.KeyVaultsrc/AzureCloudKeyVault.Core/AzureCloudKeyVault.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBussrc/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.ServiceBussrc/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutablesrc/AzureCloudServiceBus/AzureCloudServiceBus.csproj
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobssrc/AzureStorage/AzureStorage.csproj
NuGetAzure.Storage.Queuessrc/AzureStorage/AzureStorage.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationsrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Bindersrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Jsonsrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariablessrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetTestcontainerssrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsrc/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetElasticsearch.Netsrc/Elasticsearch/Elasticsearch.csproj
NuGetNESTsrc/Elasticsearch/Elasticsearch.csproj
NuGetFluentFTPsrc/FtpServer/FtpServer.csproj
NuGetMySqlConnectorsrc/MariaDB/MariaDB.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driversrc/Mongo/Mongo.csproj
NuGetMySqlConnectorsrc/MySql/MySql.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http.Jsonsrc/Nats/Nats.csproj
NuGetNeo4j.Driversrc/Neo4j/Neo4j.csproj
NuGetNpgsqlsrc/PostgreSql/PostgreSql.csproj
NuGetRabbitMQ.Clientsrc/RabbitMQ/RabbitMQ.csproj
NuGetRavenDB.Clientsrc/RavenDB/RavenDB.csproj
NuGetStackExchange.Redissrc/Redis/Redis.csproj
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobsdirect
NuGetAzure.Storage.Queuesdirect
NuGetElasticsearch.Netdirect
NuGetFluentFTPdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.EventHubsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.EventHubdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.KeyVaultdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Management.ServiceBusdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.ServiceBusdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binderdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariablesdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Jsondirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectorydirect
NuGetMongoDB.Driverdirect
NuGetMySqlConnectordirect
NuGetNeo4j.Driverdirect
NuGetNESTdirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsondirect
NuGetNpgsqldirect
NuGetRabbitMQ.Clientdirect
NuGetRavenDB.Clientdirect
NuGetStackExchange.Redisdirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutabledirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http.Jsondirect
NuGetTestcontainersdirect
NuGetAlterNats.Hostingindirect
NuGetAutoFixtureindirect
NuGetAWSSDK.S3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecretsindirect
NuGetServiceStack.Textindirect
NuGetSSH.NETindirect
NuGetTypesenseindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.