Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 18:45 UTC

Sylius / SyliusGridBundle

Generic data grids for Symfony applications, support Doctrine and custom drivers, sorting, filtering, actions and field types.

PHPMIT★ 134 stars⑂ 60 forkssince Apr 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

Sylius/SyliusGridBundle holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sylius eCommerceOrganization · verified domain
205 followers168 public repossince Apr 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistsylius/grid-bundlev1.16.1261,395143100 days agoadminapidoctrinecrudgridsyliusresource

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 219 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year219
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 47 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 100 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count47
latest_release_tagv1.16.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release100
mean_days_between_releases18.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.5/60Stars — 134 stars
14.8/25Forks — 60 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks60
stars134
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.2/80Monthly downloads — 261,395 downloads/month across packagist
11.8/20Registry dependents — 57 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagessylius/grid-bundle
dependents57
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads9,625,484
monthly_downloads261,395
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 50 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled50
top_contributor_share0.283
How it's scored
19.2/42Issue resolution — 46% of issues closed
21.4/30PR acceptance — 305/428 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs305
open_issues38
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.457
closed_unmerged_prs123
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.6/25Owner reach — 205 followers of Sylius
25/25Track record — 168 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers205
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginSylius
public_repos168
account_age_days5,674

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 100 days ago
20/20Version history — 143 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessylius/grid-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish100

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sylius.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://sylius.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 32 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.1/40Legible commit history — 62 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.62
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/368 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes34,170
source_files_sampled368
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

134GitHub stars
50contributors
219commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
47releases
2bus factor
38open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 60 ⇿
0Stars
60Forks
47Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050606022016-092021-092026-10
Major 0Minor 10Patch 16

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 18:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 32 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsylius/registry^1.5composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^2.2 || ^3.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/form^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/validator^6.4 || ^7.2 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistwebmozart/assert^1.9 || ^2.3composer.json
All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistsylius/registry—direct
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—direct
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher—direct
Packagistsymfony/form—direct
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—direct
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver—direct
Packagistsymfony/property-access—direct
Packagistsymfony/validator—direct
Packagistwebmozart/assert—direct
Packagistbabdev/pagerfanta-bundle—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/dbal—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/orm—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistence—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/phpcr-odm—indirect
Packagistjackalope/jackalope-doctrine-dbal—indirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-config-test—indirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-test—indirect
Packagistpagerfanta/pagerfanta—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphparkitect/phparkitect—indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfony—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-webmozart-assert—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistrector/rector—indirect
Packagistsylius-labs/coding-standard—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console—indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dotenv—indirect
Packagistsymfony/maker-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-csrf—indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymplify/easy-coding-standard—indirect
Packagisttwig/twig—indirect
Packagistzenstruck/foundry—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.