Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 11:44 UTC

T-Labs / exchange-sdk

C#No license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗

T-Labs/exchange-sdk holds a health index of 18 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (8/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

18
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

18
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Teregulov LabsOrganization
1 follower28 public repossince Feb 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetTLabs.ExchangeSdk1.0.908-8690 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 544 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year544
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

18Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

1Critical
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

69Good
How it's scored
55.4/80Total downloads — 215,736 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesTLabs.ExchangeSdk
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads215,736
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

59Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 37% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.369

Issue & PR responsiveness

93Exceptional
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29/30PR acceptance — 329/340 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 7/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs329
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d9
prs_merged_30d31
prs_decided_30d34
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d7
first_time_prs_decided_30d7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of T-Labs
22.6/25Track record — 28 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginT-Labs
public_repos28
account_age_days3,854

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 869 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesTLabs.ExchangeSdk
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

8Critical · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

6Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

22At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier22
security_posture_before_jurisdiction43
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 13 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

19Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.7/40Legible commit history — 35 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.35
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj, TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifestsTLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj, TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/389 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes29,151
source_files_sampled389
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
12contributors
544commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 11:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 8/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory5.0.1TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options5.0.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.15.2TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.12.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.16.1TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.5.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.Tests.csproj
NuGetAudit.NET32.2.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2024.3.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions7.0.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions7.0.1TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetRabbitMQ.Client5.1.0TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
NuGetTLabs.DotnetHelpers1.0.70TLabs.ExchangeSdk/TLabs.ExchangeSdk.csproj
All dependencies 13

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAudit.NET32.2.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2024.3.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory5.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions7.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions7.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options5.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.5.0direct
NuGetMoq4.15.2direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetNUnit3.12.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter3.16.1direct
NuGetRabbitMQ.Client5.1.0direct
NuGetTLabs.DotnetHelpers1.0.70direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 13 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with T-Labs/exchange-sdk. Read them side by side →

100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnetThe OpenTelemetry .NET ClientExceptional99App-vNext/PollyPolly is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner. From version 6.0.1, Polly targets .NET Standard 1.1 and 2.0+.Exceptional99microsoft/onnxruntime-genaiGenerative AI extensions for onnxruntimeExceptional99AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdkThe official C# SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients. Maintained in collaboration with Microsoft.Exceptional98dotnet/msbuildThe Microsoft Build Engine (MSBuild) is the build platform for .NET and Visual Studio.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.