Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 06:51 UTC

Taritsyn / WebMarkupMin

The Web Markup Minifier (abbreviated WebMarkupMin) - a .NET library that contains a set of markup minifiers. The objective of this project is to improve the performance of web applications by reducing the size of HTML, XHTML and XML code.

C#Apache-2.0★ 496 stars⑂ 46 forkssince Jul 2015View on GitHub ↗
#html#xhtml#xml#minification#minify#markup#dotnet#aspnet

Taritsyn/WebMarkupMin holds a health index of 9 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Security (5/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

9
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

9
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Andrey TaritsynPersonal account
138 followers30 public repossince Apr 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
14.6/18Commit volume — 41 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year41
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~67.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.22.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases67.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good
How it's scored
43.7/60Stars — 496 stars
13.8/25Forks — 46 forks
8/15Watchers — 28 watchers
Inputs used
forks46
stars496
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.997

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
6.4/30PR acceptance — 3/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues5
closed_issues162
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.97
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.4/25Owner reach — 138 followers of Taritsyn
22.9/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers138
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginTaritsyn
public_repos30
account_age_days5,929
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

47Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

38Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshtml, xhtml, xml, minification, minify, markup, dotnet, aspnet
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

5Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

5Critical
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.6
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier5
security_posture_before_jurisdiction26
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 11/503 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes273,199
source_files_sampled503
oversized_source_files11

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

496GitHub stars
3contributors
41commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
5open issues
—package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 06:51 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmdel5.1.0indirect
npmgulp4.0.2indirect
npmgulp-autoprefixer7.0.1indirect
npmgulp-clean-css4.2.0indirect
npmgulp-concat2.6.1indirect
npmgulp-less4.0.1indirect
npmgulp-rename2.0.0indirect
npmgulp-sourcemaps2.6.5indirect
npmgulp-uglify3.0.2indirect
NuGetAdvancedStringBuilder0.2.0indirect
NuGetAjaxMin5.14.5506.26202indirect
NuGetAntlr3.5.0.2indirect
NuGetAutoMapper6.2.2indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetBrotliSharpLib0.3.3indirect
NuGetBundleTransformer.ConfigurationIntelliSense1.17.0indirect
NuGetBundleTransformer.Core1.14.1indirect
NuGetBundleTransformer.Less1.14.0indirect
NuGetBundleTransformer.NUglify1.17.3indirect
NuGetJavaScriptEngineSwitcher.Core3.31.0indirect
NuGetJavaScriptEngineSwitcher.Msie3.31.0indirect
NuGetjQuery1.10.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.FriendlyUrls1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.FriendlyUrls.Core1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc3.0.20105.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc4.0.40804.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor2.0.30506.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages2.0.30506.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics1.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.Abstractions1.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.Abstractions2.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http1.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http.Extensions1.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http.Extensions2.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http.Features1.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http.Features2.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Core1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Core2.1.38indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers2.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ViewFeatures1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ViewFeatures2.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Razor1.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.IISIntegration1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel1.0.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles1.0.5indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables2.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json2.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging2.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console2.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug2.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options2.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Http.Headers1.0.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Http.Headers2.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.13.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design2.1.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetModernizr2.8.3indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetMsieJavaScriptEngine3.3.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetNUglify1.22.0indirect
NuGetPolyfillsForOldDotNet.System.Buffers0.1.3indirect
NuGetPolyfillsForOldDotNet.System.Threading0.1.3indirect
NuGetResxToCs.MSBuild1.0.0-alpha7indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.4.0indirect
NuGetTwitter.Bootstrap.Less3.3.0indirect
NuGetWebGrease1.6.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2indirect
NuGetYUICompressor.NET3.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Taritsyn/WebMarkupMin. Read them side by side →

89webpack/minimizer-webpack-pluginMinimizer PluginExcellent98markedjs/markedA markdown parser and compiler. Built for speed.Exceptional97Unstructured-IO/unstructuredConvert documents to structured data effortlessly. Unstructured is open-source ETL solution for transforming complex documents into clean, structured formats for language models. Visit our website to learn more about our enterprise grade Platform product for production grade workflows, partitioning, enrichments, chunking and embedding.Exceptional96reactiveui/refitThe automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, Refit turns your REST API into a live interface.Exceptional95bitwarden/serverBitwarden infrastructure/backend (API, database, Docker, etc).Exceptional94NaturalIntelligence/fast-xml-parserValidate XML, Parse XML and Build XML rapidly without C/C++ based libraries and no callback.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.