Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 19:57 UTC

ToucanToco / fastexcel

A fast excel reader for Rust and Python

Rust · PythonMIT★ 254 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

ToucanToco/fastexcel holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ToucanTocoOrganization · verified domain

25 followers62 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
crates.io	fastexcel	0.21.0	663	10	61 days ago
PyPI	fastexcel	0.21.0	2,968,336	37	61 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 14 days ago
20.1/36	Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
17/18	Commit volume — 78 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	78
human_commit_share	0.56
days_since_last_push	14
active_weeks_last_year	29

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 61 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~39 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	38
latest_release_tag	v0.21.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	61
mean_days_between_releases	39

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

55Moderate

How it's scored

39/60	Stars — 254 stars
11/25	Forks — 22 forks
5/15	Watchers — 9 watchers

Inputs used

forks	22
stars	254
watchers	9
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 2,968,999 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	fastexcel, fastexcel
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates, pypi
total_downloads	4,496
monthly_downloads	2,968,999
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	16
top_contributor_share	0.769

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

34.8/42	Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
27.4/30	PR acceptance — 364/399 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	364
open_issues	19
closed_issues	92
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.829
closed_unmerged_prs	35
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
10.2/25	Owner reach — 25 followers of ToucanToco
25/25	Track record — 62 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	25
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	ToucanToco
public_repos	62
account_age_days	4,435

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 61 days ago
20/20	Version history — 37 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	fastexcel, fastexcel
ecosystems	crates, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	61

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .clippy.toml, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://fastexcel.toucantoco.dev/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	arrow, pandas, polars, python, rust
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://fastexcel.toucantoco.dev/
docs_site	http://fastexcel.toucantoco.dev/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	13
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	245
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 1, low 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 245 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 56 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .clippy.toml, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — python/fastexcel/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 44 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	python/fastexcel/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.44

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/53 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	40,069
source_files_sampled	53
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

254GitHub stars

16contributors

78commits, last 12 months

14days since last push

38releases

1bus factor

19open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿

0Stars

22Forks

30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 15Patch 15

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 19:56 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1	Vulnerabilities	9 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 11

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	arrow-array	`^59`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	arrow-pyarrow	`^59`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	arrow-schema	`^59`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	calamine	`^0.36.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	chrono	`^0.4.40`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`^0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	polars-core	`>=0.53`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`^0.29`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3-arrow	`^0.19`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3-log	`^0.13.3`	Cargo.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`>=4.0.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 245

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 234 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	arrow-array	`59.3.0`	direct
crates.io	arrow-pyarrow	`59.3.0`	direct
crates.io	arrow-schema	`59.3.0`	direct
crates.io	calamine	`0.36.1`	direct
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.41`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.34`	direct
crates.io	polars-core	`0.53.0`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.29.2`	direct
crates.io	pyo3-arrow	`0.19.0`	direct
crates.io	pyo3-log	`0.13.4`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.12`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	allocator-api2	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	android-tzdata	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	arc-swap	`1.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	argminmax	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-buffer	`59.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-cast	`59.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-data	`59.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-ord	`59.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-select	`59.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	atoi	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	atoi_simd	`0.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	atoi_simd	`0.18.1`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	boxcar	`0.2.14`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.19.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytemuck	`1.23.2`	indirect
crates.io	bytemuck_derive	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	castaway	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.34`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	chrono-tz	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	codepage	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	comfy-table	`7.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	compact_str	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	const-random	`0.1.18`	indirect
crates.io	const-random-macro	`0.1.16`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	debug_unsafe	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	diff	`0.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	dyn-clone	`1.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	encoding_rs	`0.8.35`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	ethnum	`1.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	fast-float2	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.63`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.77`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-core	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-parse-float	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-parse-integer	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-util	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-write-float	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-write-integer	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.175`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	libz-rs-sys	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.13`	indirect
crates.io	matrixmultiply	`0.3.10`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	ndarray	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	num-complex	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-derive	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	numpy	`0.29.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.3`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.4`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.11`	indirect
crates.io	phf	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	phf_shared	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	polars-arrow	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-buffer	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-compute	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-dtype	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-error	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-row	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-schema	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	polars-utils	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	pretty_assertions	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.101`	indirect
crates.io	psm	`0.1.26`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.29.2`	indirect
crates.io	quick-xml	`0.41.0`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.40`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	raw-cpuid	`11.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	rawpointer	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	rayon	`1.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.5.17`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.10`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	relative-path	`1.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	rstest	`0.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	rstest_macros	`0.27.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.26`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	simdutf8	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	siphasher	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	slotmap	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	stacker	`0.1.21`	indirect
crates.io	static_assertions	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	streaming-iterator	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	strength_reduce	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	strum_macros	`0.27.2`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	tiny-keccak	`2.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	typed-path	`0.12.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	uuid	`1.18.0`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.14.2+wasi-0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rt	`0.39.0`	indirect
crates.io	xxhash-rust	`0.8.15`	indirect
crates.io	yansi	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.26`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.26`	indirect
crates.io	zip	`8.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	zopfli	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	et-xmlfile	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.20.3`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.16`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown2	`2.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`1.11.5`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.2.6`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	openpyxl	`3.1.5`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`2.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pdoc	`16.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	polars	`1.38.1`	indirect
PyPI	polars-runtime-32	`1.38.1`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	py-cpuinfo	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyarrow	`24.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-benchmark	`5.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	ty	`0.0.35`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2025.3`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`20.36.1`	indirect
PyPI	xlrd	`2.0.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 245 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
zip	`8.6.0`	indirect	critical	3	`9.0.0`
virtualenv	`20.36.1`	indirect	high	8	`21.7.13`
xxhash-rust	`0.8.15`	indirect	low	1	`0.8.16`
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.18`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records