Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 16:12 UTC

TuwaIO / nova-uikit

✨ Nova: A cosmic component library for building stellar Web3 experiences with React.

MDX · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗

TuwaIO/nova-uikit holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (45/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TUWAOrganization · verified domain
1 follower11 public repossince May 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 148 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year148
human_commit_share0.56
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagnova-transactions-v0.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.7/80Monthly downloads — 4,455 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@tuwaio/nova-core, @tuwaio/nova-connect, @tuwaio/nova-transactions
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,455
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.99
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 107/107 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs107
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of TuwaIO
10.6/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginTuwaIO
public_repos11
account_age_days497

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 235 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@tuwaio/nova-core, @tuwaio/nova-connect, @tuwaio/nova-transactions
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://stories.tuwa.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscomponents, hooks, react, uikit, web3
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://stories.tuwa.io
docs_sitehttps://stories.tuwa.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages25
unassessed_packages58
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 25 resolved dependencies against OSV. 58 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 56 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,034
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — MDX with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/189 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageMDX
largest_source_bytes60,660
source_files_sampled189
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
148commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 16:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 83

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@emotion/is-prop-valid^1.4.0indirect
npm@heroicons/react^2.2.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.3.4indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.3.4indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.23indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.3.7indirect
npm@safe-global/safe-apps-provider^0.18.6indirect
npm@safe-global/safe-apps-sdk^9.1.0indirect
npm@solana/kit^8.2.0indirect
npm@solana/react^8.2.0indirect
npm@solana/webcrypto-ed25519-polyfill^8.2.0indirect
npm@storybook/addon-docs10.6.0indirect
npm@storybook/addon-onboarding10.6.0indirect
npm@storybook/addon-themes^10.6.0indirect
npm@storybook/react10.6.0indirect
npm@storybook/react-vite10.6.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.3indirect
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.102.8indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-core1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.d411095indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-core^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-evm1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.d411095indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-evm^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-solana1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.d411095indirect
npm@tuwaio/orbit-solana^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/pulsar-core1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.3.51498c2indirect
npm@tuwaio/pulsar-core^0.7.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/pulsar-evm^0.6.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/pulsar-react^0.5.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/pulsar-solana^0.7.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-core1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.a24a5bcindirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-core^0.5.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-evm1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.a24a5bcindirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-evm^0.5.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-react1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.a24a5bcindirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-react^0.5.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-solana1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.4.a24a5bcindirect
npm@tuwaio/satellite-solana^0.5.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/siwx-core^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/siwx-evm^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/siwx-react1.0.0-feat-update-alpha.3.f77d0e0indirect
npm@tuwaio/siwx-react^0.3.0indirect
npm@tuwaio/siwx-solana^0.3.0indirect
npm@types/node^26.4.1indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.18indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.7indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^6.1.1indirect
npm@wagmi/connectors^8.2.0indirect
npm@wagmi/core^3.6.5indirect
npm@wallet-standard/react^1.0.3indirect
npm@walletconnect/ethereum-provider^2.24.0indirect
npm@web3icons/common^0.11.50indirect
npm@web3icons/react^4.1.21indirect
npmautoprefixer^10.5.5indirect
npmclsx^2.1.1indirect
npmdayjs^1.11.23indirect
npmethereum-blockies-base64^1.0.2indirect
npmframer-motion^13.2.0indirect
npmimmer^11.1.18indirect
npmnext16.3.4indirect
npmpnpm12.3.4indirect
npmpostcss^8.5.28indirect
npmpostcss-cli^12.0.0indirect
npmreact^19.2.8indirect
npmreact-dom^19.2.8indirect
npmreact-toastify^11.1.0indirect
npmstorybook10.6.0indirect
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0indirect
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3indirect
npmtsup^8.5.1indirect
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmviem^2.56.3indirect
npmvite^8.2.2indirect
npmvitest^5.0.0indirect
npmwagmi^3.7.7indirect
npmzustand^5.0.15indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 25 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 58 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.