Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 11:58 UTC

UitbreidenOS / UitKit

Claude Code Skills, Agents & Plugins — UitKit

JavaScript · TypeScriptCustom license★ 14 stars⑂ 5 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

UitbreidenOS/UitKit holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (78/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (38/100). It was last updated 75 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ClaudientOrganization
3 followers3 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 75 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 370 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year370
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push75
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 7 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 83 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv1.1.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release83
mean_days_between_releases6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
18.1/60Stars — 14 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars14
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges15
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
13.3/80Monthly downloads — 9 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesuitkit
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9
unverified_packages_excludedsite
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.92
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of UitbreidenOS
9.8/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginUitbreidenOS
public_repos3
account_age_days994

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 80 days ago
20/20Version history — 237 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesuitkit, site
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish80

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://uitkit-os.vercel.app/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 16 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, anthropic, claude, claude-code, cursor, developer-tools, mcp, skills, agents, ai-tools, developer-productivity, knowledge-base, prompts, workflows, design, prompt-engineering
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://uitkit-os.vercel.app/
docs_sitehttps://uitkit-os.vercel.app/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no data
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, SAST, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, community/template/stack-template/CLAUDE.md, compatibility/gemini.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/nl/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/agentic_ai_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_compliance_risk_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_ethics_governance_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_product_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_sdr_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/analytics_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/api_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/b2b_consultant_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/bio_research_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/blockchain_web3_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/brand_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/cloud_architect_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/community_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/content_marketing_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/customer_success_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/data_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/database_admin_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/devops_platform_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/distributed_systems_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ecommerce_operator_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/embedded_iot_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/finance_cfo_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/founder_ceo_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/frontend_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/fullstack_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/game_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/growth_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/gtm_engineer_stack/claude.md, professional-stacks/healthcare_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/hr_people_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/infrastructure_as_code_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/investor_vc_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/legal_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/mlai_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/mobile_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/newsletter_writer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/operations_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/platform_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/podcast_producer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/product_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/product_operations_stack/claude.md, professional-stacks/qa_testing_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/recruiter_ta_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/sales_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/security_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/solutions_architect_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/sre_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/technical_writer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/user_research_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/youtube_creator_stack/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, community/template/stack-template/CLAUDE.md, compatibility/gemini.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/dbt-pipeline/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/fastapi-ai-app/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/go-cli-tool/nl/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/de/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/es/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/fr/CLAUDE.md, examples/nextjs-saas/nl/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/agentic_ai_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_compliance_risk_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_ethics_governance_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_product_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ai_sdr_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/analytics_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/api_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/b2b_consultant_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/bio_research_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/blockchain_web3_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/brand_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/cloud_architect_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/community_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/content_marketing_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/customer_success_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/data_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/database_admin_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/devops_platform_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/distributed_systems_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/ecommerce_operator_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/embedded_iot_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/finance_cfo_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/founder_ceo_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/frontend_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/fullstack_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/game_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/growth_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/gtm_engineer_stack/claude.md, professional-stacks/healthcare_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/hr_people_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/infrastructure_as_code_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/investor_vc_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/legal_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/mlai_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/mobile_developer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/newsletter_writer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/operations_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/platform_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/podcast_producer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/product_manager_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/product_operations_stack/claude.md, professional-stacks/qa_testing_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/recruiter_ta_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/sales_operations_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/security_engineer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/solutions_architect_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/sre_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/technical_writer_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/user_research_stack/CLAUDE.md, professional-stacks/youtube_creator_stack/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,597
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docker/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, site/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocker/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configssdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, site/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, site/tsconfig.json)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/301 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes97,329
source_files_sampled301
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

14GitHub stars
2contributors
370commits, last 12 months
75days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512026-052026-062026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 11:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :43:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackaginginternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :43:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
n/aPinned-Dependenciesinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :43:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
n/aSASTinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :43:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-Permissionsinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :43:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@astrojs/react^5.0.7site/package.json
npm@astrojs/sitemap^3.7.3site/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.1site/package.json
npm@types/react^19.2.17site/package.json
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.3site/package.json
npmastro^6.4.6site/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1site/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7site/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7site/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0site/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.1site/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.