Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 01:39 UTC
Wei-Shaw / sub2api
Sub2API 一站式开源中转服务，让 Claude、Openai 、Gemini、Grok订阅统一接入，支持拼车共享，更高效分摊成本，原生工具无缝使用。
Wei-Shaw/sub2api holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Security (40/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
86
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Wesley LiddickPersonal account
783 followers56 public repossince Mar 2017
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2api | v0.1.171 | - | 164 | 0 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
88
Development activity
87Excellent
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 22.8/36 | Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 5,517 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 5,517 |
| human_commit_share | 0.97 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 33 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 32 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 0 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~1.9 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 32 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.1.171 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 0 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 1.9 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
74
Popularity & adoption
95Exceptional
How it's scored
| 60/60 | Stars — 35,848 stars |
| 25/25 | Forks — 7,371 forks |
| 10.2/15 | Watchers — 69 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 7,371 |
| stars | 35,848 |
| watchers | 69 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (LGPL-3.0) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 5 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
68
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 13.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 99 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 99 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.418 |
How it's scored
| 13.1/42 | Issue resolution — 31% of issues closed |
| 21.2/30 | PR acceptance — 1,320/1,869 decided PRs merged |
| 5.8/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/9 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 9/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 1,320 |
| open_issues | 1,887 |
| closed_issues | 859 |
| prs_merged_7d | 46 |
| prs_decided_7d | 60 |
| prs_merged_30d | 46 |
| prs_decided_30d | 60 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.313 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 549 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 8 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 4 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 9 |
Ownership & stewardship
70Good
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 20.8/25 | Owner reach — 783 followers of Wei-Shaw |
| 24.8/25 | Track record — 56 public repos, account ~9 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 783 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | Wei-Shaw |
| public_repos | 56 |
| account_age_days | 3,443 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 164 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | github.com/Wei-Shaw/sub2api |
| ecosystems | go |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 0 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
84
Engineering practices
84Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 4 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .eslintrc.cjs, .golangci.yml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 9 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | 2api, antigravity2api, claude, claude-code, codex, crs, gemini, cc2api, crs2 |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
40
Security posture
40Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 4.5/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 11/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 64 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 18 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 0 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4 |
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
65
Agent context & guidance
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 91 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.938 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile, backend/Makefile, deploy/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .eslintrc.cjs, .golangci.yml |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | go.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile, backend/Makefile, deploy/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | frontend/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | backend/go.mod |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 53.3/55 | Manageable file sizes — 81/2,647 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 1,808,388 |
| source_files_sampled | 2,647 |
| oversized_source_files | 81 |
Key facts
35,848GitHub stars
99contributors
5,517commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
32releases
2bus factor
1,887open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 34 authors (cap 12)
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7,371 ⇿
0Stars
7,371Forks
18Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Major 0Minor 0Patch 18
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 6 | Code-Review | Found 11/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 10 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 64 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 73
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | entgo.io/ent | v0.14.5 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock | v1.5.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/alibabacloud-go/captcha-20230305 | v1.1.3 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/alibabacloud-go/darabonba-openapi/v2 | v2.1.13 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/alibabacloud-go/tea | v1.3.13 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/alicebob/miniredis/v2 | v2.38.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/alitto/pond/v2 | v2.6.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/andybalholm/brotli | v1.2.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2 | v1.41.5 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config | v1.32.10 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials | v1.19.10 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3 | v1.97.3 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2 | v2.3.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/coder/websocket | v1.8.14 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto | v0.2.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gin-gonic/gin | v1.9.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn | v0.17.4 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5 | v5.3.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/google/uuid | v1.6.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/google/wire | v0.7.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/gorilla/websocket | v1.5.3 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/imroc/req/v3 | v3.59.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/klauspost/compress | v1.18.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/lib/pq | v1.10.9 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/patrickmn/go-cache | v2.1.0+incompatible | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pquerna/otp | v1.5.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/redis/go-redis/v9 | v9.17.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/refraction-networking/utls | v1.8.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/robfig/cron/v3 | v3.0.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4 | v4.25.6 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/shopspring/decimal | v1.4.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/smartwalle/alipay/v3 | v3.2.29 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/viper | v1.18.2 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/stretchr/testify | v1.11.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/stripe/stripe-go/v85 | v85.0.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tencentcloud/tencentcloud-sdk-go/tencentcloud/captcha | v1.3.52 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tencentcloud/tencentcloud-sdk-go/tencentcloud/common | v1.3.52 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/postgres | v0.40.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go/modules/redis | v0.40.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tidwall/gjson | v1.18.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tidwall/sjson | v1.2.5 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/tiktoken-go/tokenizer | v0.8.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/wechatpay-apiv3/wechatpay-go | v0.2.21 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | github.com/zeromicro/go-zero | v1.9.4 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | go.uber.org/zap | v1.24.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/crypto | v0.53.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/image | v0.41.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/mod | v0.37.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/net | v0.56.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/sync | v0.21.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.44.0 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2 | v2.2.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | backend/go.mod |
| Go | modernc.org/sqlite | v1.44.3 | backend/go.mod |
| npm | @airwallex/components-sdk | ^1.30.2 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | @lobehub/icons | ^4.0.2 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | @stripe/stripe-js | ^9.0.1 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | @tanstack/vue-virtual | ^3.13.23 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | @vueuse/core | ^10.7.0 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | axios | ^1.18.0 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | chart.js | ^4.4.1 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | dompurify | ^3.3.1 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | driver.js | ^1.4.0 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | file-saver | ^2.0.5 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | marked | ^17.0.1 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | pinia | ^2.1.7 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | qrcode | ^1.5.4 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | vue | ^3.4.0 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | vue-chartjs | ^5.3.0 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | vue-draggable-plus | ^0.6.1 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | vue-i18n | ^9.14.5 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | vue-router | ^4.2.5 | frontend/package.json |
| npm | xlsx | ^0.18.5 | frontend/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.