Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 17:42 UTC

XRPDomains / xrpl-wallet-kit

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

XRPDomains/xrpl-wallet-kit holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

XRPNameOrganization
14 followers9 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
16.1/18Commit volume61 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year61
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases11 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~7.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv0.1.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.2/80Monthly downloads2,056 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui, @xrpl-wallet-kit/auth, @xrpl-wallet-kit/core, @xrpl-wallet-kit/next, @xrpl-wallet-kit/react, @xrpl-wallet-kit/client, @xrpl-wallet-kit/browser
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,056
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance1/1 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.5/25Owner reach14 followers of XRPDomains
14.6/25Track record9 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginXRPDomains
public_repos9
account_age_days1,341

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable7 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui, @xrpl-wallet-kit/auth, @xrpl-wallet-kit/core, @xrpl-wallet-kit/next, @xrpl-wallet-kit/react, @xrpl-wallet-kit/client, @xrpl-wallet-kit/browser
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

36Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui@0.1.13 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
13.1/40Legible commit history15 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.246
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,391
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingdocs/adapters/templates/adapter-package/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/crossmark/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/dropfi/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/gemwallet/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/ledger/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/otsu/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/walletconnect/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/xaman/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/xrpl-snap/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/browser/tsconfig.json, packages/client/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/next/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, skills/xrpl-wallet-kit-adapter-developer/templates/adapter-package/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 61
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsdocs/adapters/templates/adapter-package/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/crossmark/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/dropfi/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/gemwallet/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/ledger/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/otsu/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/walletconnect/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/xaman/tsconfig.json, packages/adapters/xrpl-snap/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/browser/tsconfig.json, packages/client/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/next/tsconfig.json, packages/react/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, skills/xrpl-wallet-kit-adapter-developer/templates/adapter-package/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes3/84 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,766,610
source_files_sampled84
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
61commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.1 / 10
2.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 17:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/core0.1.13packages/auth/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/client0.1.13packages/browser/package.json
npmbuffer^6.0.3packages/browser/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/core0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-crossmark0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-dropfi0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-gemwallet0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-ledger0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-walletconnect0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-xaman0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/adapter-xrpl-snap0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui0.1.13packages/client/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/core0.1.13packages/next/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/react0.1.13packages/next/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/core0.1.13packages/react/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui0.1.13packages/react/package.json
npm@xrpl-wallet-kit/core0.1.13packages/ui/package.json
npmqr-code-styling^1.9.2packages/ui/package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4packages/ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@xrpl-wallet-kit/ui@0.1.13 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.