Public recordWeak
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 15:37 UTC
ZenHive / onchain-stack
ZenHive/onchain-stack holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (18/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
38
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
ZenHiveOrganization
5 followers49 public repossince Feb 2025
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hex | onchain | 0.14.0 | 2,386 | 18 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | cartouche | 0.9.0 | 2,688 | 17 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | hieroglyph | 1.8.0 | 759 | 11 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | onchain_js | 0.4.0 | 548 | 4 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | onchain_evm | 0.7.0 | 94 | 7 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | onchain_aave | 0.4.0 | 110 | 7 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | onchain_tempo | 0.10.0 | 2,131 | 13 | 2 days ago |
| Hex | onchain_aerodrome | 0.1.0 | 10 | 1 | 2 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
71
Development activity
68Good
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 2 days ago |
| 13.8/36 | Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 997 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 997 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 2 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 20 |
Release discipline
76Good
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 1 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 2 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release) |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 1 |
| latest_release_tag | onchain_evm-v0.7.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 2 |
| mean_days_between_releases | — |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
29
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 0 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 0 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
35Weak
How it's scored
| 0/22.5 | README |
| 0/22.5 | License — no license file detected |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | no |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
How it's scored
| 52.5/80 | Monthly downloads — 8,726 downloads/month across hex |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | onchain, cartouche, hieroglyph, onchain_js, onchain_evm, onchain_aave, onchain_tempo, onchain_aerodrome |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | hex |
| total_downloads | 38,763 |
| monthly_downloads | 8,726 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
43
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
32At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 2.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits |
| 10.8/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 8 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 8 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.908 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 0/30 | PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 0 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 0 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
51Moderate
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 5.6/25 | Owner reach — 5 followers of ZenHive |
| 15.5/25 | Track record — 49 public repos, account ~1 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 5 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | ZenHive |
| public_repos | 49 |
| account_age_days | 574 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on hex |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 18 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | onchain, cartouche, hieroglyph, onchain_js, onchain_evm, onchain_aave, onchain_tempo, onchain_aerodrome |
| ecosystems | hex |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 2 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
18
Engineering practices
30At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 0/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | no |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | no |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
42
Security posture
42Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 5/5 | Fuzzing — project is fuzzed |
| 0/2.5 | License — license file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 3.8/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 13 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 5 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
59
Agent context & guidance
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/cartouche/AGENTS.md, packages/cartouche/CLAUDE.md, packages/hieroglyph/AGENTS.md, packages/hieroglyph/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_aave/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_aave/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_aerodrome/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_aerodrome/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_evm/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_evm/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_js/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_js/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_tempo/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_tempo/CLAUDE.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.95 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, packages/cartouche/AGENTS.md, packages/cartouche/CLAUDE.md, packages/hieroglyph/AGENTS.md, packages/hieroglyph/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_aave/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_aave/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_aerodrome/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_aerodrome/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_evm/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_evm/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_js/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_js/CLAUDE.md, packages/onchain_tempo/AGENTS.md, packages/onchain_tempo/CLAUDE.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 94,082 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
52Moderate
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — mix.exs, packages/cartouche/mix.exs, packages/hieroglyph/mix.exs (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 2/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, mix.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0.01 |
| toolchain_manifests | mix.exs, packages/cartouche/mix.exs, packages/hieroglyph/mix.exs, packages/onchain/mix.exs, packages/onchain_aave/mix.exs, packages/onchain_aerodrome/mix.exs, packages/onchain_evm/mix.exs, packages/onchain_evm/native/onchain_evm/Cargo.toml, packages/onchain_evm/native/onchain_solidity/Cargo.toml, packages/onchain_js/mix.exs, packages/onchain_tempo/mix.exs |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — Elixir without a type-check config |
| 54.4/55 | Manageable file sizes — 6/521 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Elixir |
| largest_source_bytes | 1,465,538 |
| source_files_sampled | 521 |
| oversized_source_files | 6 |
Machine-readable interfaces
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 0/40 | Runnable examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | — |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
0GitHub stars
8contributors
997commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Hexpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Could not fetch hex package 'onchain_stack' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 7 contributing companies or organizations |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 10 | Fuzzing | project is fuzzed |
| 0 | License | license file not detected |
| 0 | Maintained | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| n/a | Pinned-Dependencies | no dependencies found |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 5 | Vulnerabilities | 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 32
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hex | jason | ~> 1.4.5 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | decimal | ~> 3.1 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | req | ~> 0.6.2 or ~> 0.7 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | ex_sha3 | ~> 0.1.5 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | curvy | ~> 0.3.1 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | goth | ~> 1.4.5 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | ex_rlp | ~> 0.6.0 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | abi | ../abi | packages/cartouche/mix.exs |
| Hex | jason | ~> 1.4 | packages/hieroglyph/mix.exs |
| Hex | ex_sha3 | ~> 0.1.4 | packages/hieroglyph/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/hieroglyph/mix.exs |
| Hex | decimal | ~> 3.1.1 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | jason | ~> 1.4 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | nimble_options | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | req | ~> 0.6 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | telemetry | ~> 1.4 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | zen_websocket | ~> 0.9.0 | packages/onchain/mix.exs |
| Hex | decimal | ~> 3.1 | packages/onchain_aave/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain_aave/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain_aerodrome/mix.exs |
| Hex | decimal | ~> 3.1 | packages/onchain_aerodrome/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain_evm/mix.exs |
| Hex | rustler_precompiled | ~> 0.9.0 | packages/onchain_evm/mix.exs |
| Hex | rustler | ~> 0.38 | packages/onchain_evm/mix.exs |
| Hex | quickbeam | ~> 0.11.0 | packages/onchain_js/mix.exs |
| Hex | npm | ~> 0.7 | packages/onchain_js/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain_js/mix.exs |
| Hex | req | ~> 0.6 or ~> 0.7 | packages/onchain_tempo/mix.exs |
| Hex | jason | ~> 1.4 | packages/onchain_tempo/mix.exs |
| Hex | descripex | ~> 1.0 | packages/onchain_tempo/mix.exs |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.