Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 13:19 UTC

a-scie / jump

A Self Contained Interpreted Executable Launcher

RustApache-2.0★ 77 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

a-scie/jump holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (50/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ScienceOrganization

13 followers9 public repossince Oct 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
crates.io	jump	0.1.0	5	1	3720 days ago
crates.io	package	0.0.0	31	1	3084 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
26.3/36	Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
17.4/18	Commit volume — 85 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	85
human_commit_share	0.43
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	38

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 56 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 28 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~27.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	56
latest_release_tag	v1.13.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	28
mean_days_between_releases	27.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

41Weak

How it's scored

30.5/60	Stars — 77 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	77
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.991

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good

How it's scored

38.2/42	Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
29.1/30	PR acceptance — 321/331 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	321
open_issues	4
closed_issues	40
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.909
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
8.2/25	Owner reach — 13 followers of a-scie
14.9/25	Track record — 9 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	13
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	a-scie
public_repos	9
account_age_days	1,396

Package maintenance

53Moderate

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 3,084 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	jump, package
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	3,084

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

58Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/jump
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	rust, executable, cli, packaging-tool
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.rs/jump
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	1
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:jump@0.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 42 of 43 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.977
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, jump/Cargo.toml, package/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 57 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, jump/Cargo.toml, package/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.57

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	54,676
source_files_sampled	24
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

77GitHub stars

3contributors

85commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

56releases

1bus factor

4open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'scie-jump' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 14Patch 11

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 13:18 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9	CI-Tests	29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 41

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	env_logger	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	jump	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	logging_timer	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	nix	`0.31`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	proc-exit	`2.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	semver	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	zip	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	byteorder	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	bzip2	`0.6`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dirs	`6.0`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fd-lock	`4.0`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`1.0`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	hex	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`2.8`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	itertools	`0.15`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	logging_timer	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	os_str_bytes	`7.1`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1.11`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	semver	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha2	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	structure	`0.1`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tar	`0.4`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	xz2	`0.1`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	zip	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	zstd	`0.13`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	walkdir	`2.3`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dotenvs	`—`	jump/Cargo.toml
crates.io	byteorder	`—`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cargo_toml	`1.0`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`4.6`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	hex	`—`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	jump	`—`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	proc-exit	`2.0`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha2	`—`	package/Cargo.toml
crates.io	which	`8.0.2`	package/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 195

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 49 direct and 146 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	byteorder	`1.5.0`	direct
crates.io	bzip2	`—`	direct
crates.io	bzip2	`0.6.1`	direct
crates.io	cargo_toml	`—`	direct
crates.io	cargo_toml	`1.0.0`	direct
crates.io	clap	`—`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.6.6`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`—`	direct
crates.io	dirs	`6.0.0`	direct
crates.io	dotenvs	`0.1.0`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.11`	direct
crates.io	fd-lock	`—`	direct
crates.io	fd-lock	`4.0.4`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`—`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	direct
crates.io	hex	`0.4.3`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`—`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`2.13.0`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`—`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`0.15.0`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.33`	direct
crates.io	logging_timer	`1.1.1`	direct
crates.io	nix	`0.31.3`	direct
crates.io	os_str_bytes	`—`	direct
crates.io	os_str_bytes	`7.1.1`	direct
crates.io	proc-exit	`—`	direct
crates.io	proc-exit	`2.0.2`	direct
crates.io	regex	`—`	direct
crates.io	regex	`1.12.3`	direct
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.149`	direct
crates.io	sha2	`0.11.0`	direct
crates.io	structure	`—`	direct
crates.io	structure	`0.1.2`	direct
crates.io	tar	`—`	direct
crates.io	tar	`0.4.46`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`3.27.0`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`—`	direct
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	direct
crates.io	which	`—`	direct
crates.io	which	`8.0.5`	direct
crates.io	xz2	`—`	direct
crates.io	xz2	`0.1.7`	direct
crates.io	zip	`8.6.0`	direct
crates.io	zstd	`—`	direct
crates.io	zstd	`0.13.3`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.2`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.58`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	cfg_aliases	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	ctor	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ctor	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	ctor-proc-macro	`0.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	dirs-sys	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	dtor	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	dtor-proc-macro	`0.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	embed-resource	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	env_filter	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.27`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.16.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hybrid-array	`0.4.10`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.34`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libbz2-rs-sys	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libredox	`0.1.15`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	logging_timer_proc_macros	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	lzma-sys	`0.1.20`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	option-ext	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	plain	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro-hack	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro-hack-impl	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`0.3.15`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	redox_users	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.10`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	structure-macro-impl	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`1.0.109`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`1.1.2+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`1.1.1+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_parser	`1.1.2+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_writer	`1.1.1+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	typed-path	`0.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.19.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	vswhom	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	vswhom-sys	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.2+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-collections	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.62.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-future	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-numerics	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows-threading	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	winreg	`0.55.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	xattr	`1.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	zopfli	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-safe	`7.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-sys	`2.0.16+zstd.1.5.7`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:jump@0.1.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records