Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-31 07:08 UTC

abhinav / git-spice

Manage stacked Git branches

GoGPL-3.0★ 737 stars⑂ 70 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

abhinav/git-spice holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (63/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Abhinav GuptaPersonal account

485 followers73 public repossince Dec 2008

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	go.abhg.dev/gs	v0.31.2	-	65	9 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
35.3/36	Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 465 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	465
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	51

Release discipline

91Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 63 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.3 days
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	63
latest_release_tag	v0.31.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	9
mean_days_between_releases	10.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good

How it's scored

46.5/60	Stars — 737 stars
15.3/25	Forks — 70 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	70
stars	737
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 34 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	34
top_contributor_share	0.936

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

35.2/42	Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
28.7/30	PR acceptance — 978/1,021 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	978
open_issues	48
closed_issues	248
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.838
closed_unmerged_prs	43
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.3/25	Owner reach — 485 followers of abhinav
25/25	Track record — 73 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	485
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	abhinav
public_repos	73
account_age_days	6,432

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20	Version history — 65 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	go.abhg.dev/gs
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://abhinav.github.io/git-spice/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	developer-tools, git
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://abhinav.github.io/git-spice/
docs_site	https://abhinav.github.io/git-spice/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0.8/7.5	Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	150
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

90Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, internal/forge/shamhub/AGENTS.md, internal/handler/AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 92 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.948
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, internal/forge/shamhub/AGENTS.md, internal/handler/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,124

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

89Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — doc/mise.toml, mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	doc/mise.toml, mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	doc/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/745 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	283,209
source_files_sampled	745
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

737GitHub stars

34contributors

465commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

63releases

1bus factor

48open issues

Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 70 ⇿

0Stars

70Forks

50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 31Patch 19

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-31 07:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
1	Signed-Releases	1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 30

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	charm.land/bubbles/v2	`v2.1.0`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/bubbletea/v2	`v2.0.6`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/lipgloss/v2	`v2.0.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/alecthomas/kong	`v1.15.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/buildkite/shellwords	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.4.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cli/browser	`v1.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/creack/pty	`v1.1.24`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hexops/autogold/v2	`v2.3.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.22`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.14.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sahilm/fuzzy	`v0.1.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/vito/midterm	`v0.2.5-0.20260406170451-de5b3b202c56`	go.mod
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.8`	go.mod
Go	go.abhg.dev/container/ring	`v0.3.0`	go.mod
Go	go.abhg.dev/io/ioutil	`v0.1.0`	go.mod
Go	go.abhg.dev/komplete	`v0.1.0`	go.mod
Go	go.abhg.dev/log/silog	`v0.3.0`	go.mod
Go	go.abhg.dev/testing/stub	`v0.2.0`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/mock	`v0.6.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.36.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/dnaeon/go-vcr.v4	`v4.0.6`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	pgregory.net/rapid	`v1.3.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 115 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	charm.land/bubbles/v2	`v2.1.0`	direct
Go	charm.land/bubbletea/v2	`v2.0.6`	direct
Go	charm.land/lipgloss/v2	`v2.0.3`	direct
Go	github.com/alecthomas/kong	`v1.9.0`	direct
Go	github.com/buildkite/shellwords	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dc`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.4.3`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.7`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.8.0`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.1`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/cli/browser	`v1.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/creack/pty	`v1.1.24`	direct
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/hexops/autogold/v2	`v2.3.1`	direct
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	direct
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.22`	direct
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.14.1`	direct
Go	github.com/sahilm/fuzzy	`v0.1.2`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/vito/midterm	`v0.2.5-0.20260406170451-de5b3b202c56`	direct
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.8`	direct
Go	go.abhg.dev/container/ring	`v0.3.0`	direct
Go	go.abhg.dev/io/ioutil	`v0.1.0`	direct
Go	go.abhg.dev/komplete	`v0.1.0`	direct
Go	go.abhg.dev/log/silog	`v0.3.0`	direct
Go	go.abhg.dev/testing/stub	`v0.2.0`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/mock	`v0.6.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.36.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.36.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.8.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/dnaeon/go-vcr.v4	`v4.0.6`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	pgregory.net/rapid	`v1.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/adrg/xdg	`v0.5.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2	`v2.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/beevik/etree	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/caarlos0/go-shellwords	`v1.0.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/catppuccin/go	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles	`v0.20.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea	`v1.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/freeze	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/huh	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/log	`v0.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/ultraviolet	`v0.0.0-20260416155717-489999b90468`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf	`v0.0.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/conpty	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/errors	`v0.0.0-20240906161213-162f3037fef5`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/strings	`v0.0.0-20240906161213-162f3037fef5`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/termios	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/windows	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/xpty	`v0.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2	`v2.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/danielgatis/go-ansicode	`v1.0.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/danielgatis/go-iterator	`v0.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/danielgatis/go-utf8	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/danielgatis/go-vte	`v1.0.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/danieljoos/wincred	`v1.2.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2	`v1.11.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/erikgeiser/coninput	`v0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0f`	indirect
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logfmt/logfmt	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/go-cmp	`v0.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/hexops/gotextdiff	`v1.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/hexops/valast	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kanrichan/resvg-go	`v0.0.2-0.20231001163256-63db194ca9f5`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-localereader	`v0.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.16`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.23`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/hashstructure/v2	`v2.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/ansi	`v0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/cancelreader	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/termenv	`v0.16.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/nightlyone/lockfile	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/tetratelabs/wazero	`v1.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v4	`v4.0.0-rc.3`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20240904232852-e7e105dedf7e`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20250813145105-42675adae3e6`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.31.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.43.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.18.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.44.0`	indirect
Go	mvdan.cc/gofumpt	`v0.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`6.2`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	cairocffi	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	cairosvg	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.2.25`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	cssselect2	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	git-spice-docs	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-exec	`1.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdownify	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat	`0.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat-tables	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-document-dates	`3.7.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-llmstxt	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-materialx	`10.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-redirects	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.1`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.6`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments-ansi-color	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
click	`8.3.2`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.31.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.43.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.18.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records