Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:34 UTC

abyo-software / s4

GPU-accelerated transparent compression S3-compatible storage gateway. Drop-in replacement for AWS S3 endpoints; cuts your S3 bill 50-80% with no app changes (Rust, nvCOMP, zstd).

RustApache-2.0★ 158 stars⑂ 9 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolPluginhow this is determined
#apache-2#aws-s3#compression#cost-optimization#cuda#data-lake#gpu#minio#nvcomp#observability#opentelemetry#parquet#prometheus#rust#s3#s3-compatible#storage-gateway#transparent-compression#zstd

abyo-software/s4 holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 70 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

abyo software LLCOrganization
2 followers15 public repossince Apr 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ios3spoints to another repo — not scored0.16.1104,964442 days agos3web-programming
crates.ios3s-awspoints to another repo — not scored0.16.14,749422 days agos3web-programming
crates.ios4-codec1.5.2983970 days agocompressiongpunvcomps3zstdnetwork-programmingweb-programming
PyPIs4fs1.5.156871 days agos3fsspeccompressionzstdpandaspyarrow
crates.ios4-config1.5.2883970 days agocompressiongpunvcomps3zstdnetwork-programmingweb-programming
crates.ios4-server1.4.0503590 days agocompressiongpunvcomps3zstdnetwork-programmingweb-programming
crates.ios4-codec-py1.4.0231690 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

51Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 70 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 292 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year292
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push70
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 70 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count39
latest_release_tagv1.5.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release70
mean_days_between_releases3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak
How it's scored
35.6/60Stars — 158 stars
7.5/25Forks — 9 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars158
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
33.3/80Monthly downloads — 315 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagess4-codec, s4fs, s4-config, s4-server, s4-codec-py
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads2,772
monthly_downloads315
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 8/9 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues0
closed_issues142
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

43Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of abyo-software
9.6/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginabyo-software
public_repos15
account_age_days143

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 70 days ago
20/20Version history — 39 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagess4-codec, s4fs, s4-config, s4-server, s4-codec-py
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish70

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s3s/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-config/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/abyo-software/s4
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapache-2, aws-s3, compression, cost-optimization, cuda, data-lake, gpu, minio, nvcomp, observability, opentelemetry, parquet, prometheus, rust, s3, s3-compatible, storage-gateway, transparent-compression, zstd
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/abyo-software/s4
docs_sitehttps://github.com/abyo-software/s4
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml, crates/s3s/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s3s/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-config/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 89 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.89
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml, crates/s3s/Cargo.toml, crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml, crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml, crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml, crates/s4-config/Cargo.toml, crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

93Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
47.7/55Manageable file sizes — 32/240 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes1,515,661
source_files_sampled240
oversized_source_files32

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

158GitHub stars
1contributors
292commits, last 12 months
70days since last push
39releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 's3s' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Nugine/s3s); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 's3s-aws' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Nugine/s3s); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 's4-codec-wasm' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810942026-062026-062026-06
Major 1Minor 7Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 148
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.89crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-s31.124.0crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-smithy-runtime-api1.11.5crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-smithy-types1.4.5crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-smithy-types-convert0.60.13crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1.8.1crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ios3s0.13.0-s4.1crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.iostd-next0.1.9crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync_wrapper1.0.2crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.44crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.iotransform-stream0.3.1crates/s3s-aws/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1.8.2crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.6crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.89crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioatoi2.0.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64-simd0.8.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1.11.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytestring1.5.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.44crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc-fast1.9.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.32crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex-simd0.8.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac=0.13.0-rc.5crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1.4.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body1.0.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1.3crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttparse1.10.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper1.8.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitoa1.0.17crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-5=0.11.0-rc.5crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2.8.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iomime0.3.17crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ionom8.0.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ionumeric_cast0.3.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquick-xml0.41.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha1=0.11.0-rc.5crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2=0.11.0-rc.5crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iostd-next0.1.9crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubtle2.6.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iosync_wrapper1.0.2crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.18crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iotime0.3.47crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.49.0crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower0.5.3crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.44crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iotransform-stream0.3.1crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.8crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iourlencoding2.1.3crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1.8.2crates/s3s/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml
crates.ios4-codec-rs1crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32c—crates/s4-codec-py/Cargo.toml
crates.ios4-codec1crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32c—crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys0.3crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioweb-sys0.3crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole_error_panic_hook0.1crates/s4-codec-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32c—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iocudarc0.13crates/s4-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/s4-config/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—crates/s4-config/Cargo.toml
crates.ios3s—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ios3s-aws—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-config—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-s3—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-credential-types—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyper-util—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-compression—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32c—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-lite—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iometrics—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iometrics-exporter-prometheus—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetry—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetry_sdk—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetry-otlp—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-opentelemetry—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile2crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarc-swap1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-acme0.15crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iogovernor0.10crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-gcm0.10crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-50.10crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iop2560.13crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioecdsa0.16crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-kms1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-sns1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-sqs1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparquet—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarrow—crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotempfile3crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-sdk-marketplacemetering1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ios4-codec1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.ios4-config1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iosqlparser0.51crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32fast1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha10.10crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iototp-rs5crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase320.5crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8crates/s4-server/Cargo.toml
PyPIfsspec>=2023.1.0python/s4fs/pyproject.toml
PyPIs4-codec>=1.2.0,<2python/s4fs/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with abyo-software/s4. Read them side by side →

98GreptimeTeam/greptimedbThe open-source observability database. One columnar engine for metrics, logs, and traces, on object storage.Exceptional98svix/svix-webhooksThe open source and enterprise-ready webhooks service 🦀Exceptional99NVIDIA/cudfcuDF - GPU DataFrame Library Exceptional98SigNoz/signozSigNoz is an open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform for your team and their AI agents. Get logs, metrics, and traces in one tool with features like APM, distributed tracing, log management, infra monitoring, etc. Combined with SigNoz MCP and a native AI teammate (in SigNoz Cloud) it helps you build more resilient apps.Exceptional97openobserve/openobserveOpen source observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, RUM, Session replay, pipelines, SLO and LLM observability. A sophisticated, simple and highly performant alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch with 140x lower storage costs and single binary deployment.Exceptional99grafana/mimirGrafana Mimir provides horizontally scalable, highly available, multi-tenant, long-term storage for Prometheus.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.