Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 14:00 UTC

achiya-automation / safari-mcp

Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 97 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs silently in background. Drop-in alternative to Chrome DevTools MCP with 40-60% less CPU/heat on Apple Silicon.

JavaScriptMIT★ 183 stars⑂ 26 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

achiya-automation/safari-mcp holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

אחיה אוטומציהPersonal account

5 followers38 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	safari-mcp	2.21.0	7,160	94	0 days ago	safari mcp mcp-server model-context-protocol browser-automation macos apple webkit claude cursor ai-agent applescript apple-silicon web-automation anthropic windsurf continue-dev devtools testing scraping screenshot ai-automation

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

82Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18/36	Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 441 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	441
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	26

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 97 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	97
latest_release_tag	v2.21.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	2.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak

How it's scored

36.7/60	Stars — 183 stars
11.7/25	Forks — 26 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	26
stars	183
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	9
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate

How it's scored

51.4/80	Monthly downloads — 7,160 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	safari-mcp
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	7,160
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
9.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	7
top_contributor_share	0.973

Issue & PR responsiveness

49Weak

How it's scored

26.1/42	Issue resolution — 62% of issues closed
22.7/30	PR acceptance — 47/62 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	47
open_issues	11
closed_issues	18
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	0.621
closed_unmerged_prs	15
first_time_authors_30d	3
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	4

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
5.6/25	Owner reach — 5 followers of achiya-automation
17/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	5
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	achiya-automation
public_repos	38
account_age_days	988

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 94 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	safari-mcp
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://achiya-automation.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	applescript, browser-automation, claude, cursor, macos, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, safari, webkit, apple-silicon, ai-agents, web-automation, windsurf, ai-tools, automation, devtools, llm-tools, claude-code, mcp, safari-mcp
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://achiya-automation.com
docs_site	https://achiya-automation.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good

How it's scored

6.8/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	224
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 224 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://achiya-automation.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 91 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://achiya-automation.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11	Static type checking — jsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	jsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.09

Code legibility for models

80Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (jsconfig.json)
52.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 3/67 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	304,446
source_files_sampled	67
oversized_source_files	3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

183GitHub stars

7contributors

441commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

97releases

1bus factor

11open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index npm:safari-mcp@2.21.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 26 ⇿

0Stars

26Forks

88Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 16Patch 72

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10

6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 14:00 UTC

9	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`^1.30.0`	package.json
npm	ws	`^8.19.0`	package.json

All dependencies 224

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 222 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@modelcontextprotocol/sdk	`1.30.0`	direct
npm	ws	`8.21.3`	direct
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`5.1.11`	indirect
npm	@asamuzakjp/dom-selector	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	@asamuzakjp/generational-cache	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@asamuzakjp/nwsapi	`2.3.9`	indirect
npm	@bramus/specificity	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/memory	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	@cacheable/utils	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree	`1.1.9`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.10.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	@exodus/bytes	`1.15.1`	indirect
npm	@hono/node-server	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@keyv/bigmap	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@keyv/serialize	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.4.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	accepts	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	ajv-formats	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	bidi-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	cacheable	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	content-type	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.6`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.10.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	eventsource	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	eventsource-parser	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	express	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	express-rate-limit	`8.6.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`11.1.5`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`6.1.23`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.4`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.12.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hashery	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	hono	`4.13.5`	indirect
npm	hookified	`1.15.1`	indirect
npm	hookified	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jose	`6.2.10`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`29.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-schema-typed	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`5.6.0`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.5.2`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.27.1`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parse5	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	pkce-challenge	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	qified	`0.10.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.16.0`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	router	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tldts	`7.4.11`	indirect
npm	tldts-core	`7.4.11`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	tr46	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-is	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	undici	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`16.0.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	zod-to-json-schema	`3.25.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 224 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records