Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-31 14:11 UTC

achttienvijftien / missed-schedule-fixer

Ever had problems with scheduled posts not being published? This plugin fixes that problem.

PHPGPL-3.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined

achttienvijftien/missed-schedule-fixer holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (42/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

1815Organization
3 followers32 public repossince Mar 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistachttienvijftien/missed-schedule-fixer1.0.06,6761676 days agopluginwordpressschedulepostmissed

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 676 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tag1.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release676
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51/80Monthly downloads6,676 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesachttienvijftien/missed-schedule-fixer
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads111,540
monthly_downloads6,676
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

33At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
4.3/25Owner reach3 followers of achttienvijftien
21.9/25Track record32 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginachttienvijftien
public_repos32
account_age_days1,976
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 676 days ago
4/20Version history1 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesachttienvijftien/missed-schedule-fixer
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish676

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswordpress, wordpress-plugin
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories20
affected_packages8
assessed_packages169
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 7
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 169 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/5 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes2,343
source_files_sampled5
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-31 14:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 170 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@kwsites/file-exists1.1.1indirect
npm@kwsites/promise-deferred1.1.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is4.6.0indirect
npm@szmarczak/http-timer4.0.6indirect
npm@types/cacheable-request6.0.3indirect
npm@types/http-cache-semantics4.0.4indirect
npm@types/keyv3.1.4indirect
npm@types/node22.3.0indirect
npm@types/responselike1.0.3indirect
npm@wordpress/env5.16.0indirect
npmansi-escapes4.3.2indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbuffer-crc320.2.13indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcacheable-lookup5.0.4indirect
npmcacheable-request7.0.4indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmchalk3.0.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchardet0.7.0indirect
npmcli-cursor3.1.0indirect
npmcli-spinners2.9.2indirect
npmcli-width3.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmclone1.0.4indirect
npmclone-response1.0.3indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconcat-stream1.6.2indirect
npmcopy-dir1.3.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmdebug2.6.9indirect
npmdebug4.3.6indirect
npmdecompress-response6.0.0indirect
npmdefaults1.0.4indirect
npmdefer-to-connect2.0.1indirect
npmdocker-compose0.22.2indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmescalade3.1.2indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmexternal-editor3.1.0indirect
npmextract-zip1.7.0indirect
npmfd-slicer1.1.0indirect
npmfigures3.2.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmgot11.8.6indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-cache-semantics4.1.1indirect
npmhttp2-wrapper1.0.3indirect
npmiconv-lite0.4.24indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npminquirer7.3.3indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-interactive1.0.0indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlog-symbols3.0.0indirect
npmlowercase-keys2.0.0indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmmimic-response1.0.1indirect
npmmimic-response3.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.6indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmmute-stream0.0.8indirect
npmnormalize-url6.1.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmora4.1.1indirect
npmos-tmpdir1.0.2indirect
npmp-cancelable2.1.1indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmpump3.0.0indirect
npmquick-lru5.1.1indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.8indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-alpn1.2.1indirect
npmresponselike2.0.1indirect
npmrestore-cursor3.1.0indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-async2.4.1indirect
npmrxjs6.6.7indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmsimple-git3.25.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-hyperlinks2.3.0indirect
npmterminal-link2.1.1indirect
npmthrough2.3.8indirect
npmtmp0.0.33indirect
npmtslib1.14.1indirect
npmtype-fest0.21.3indirect
npmtypedarray0.0.6indirect
npmundici-types6.18.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwcwidth1.0.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyauzl2.10.0indirect
Packagistachttienvijftien/building-techniquesindirect
Packagistcomposer/installers1.12.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer0.7.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.12.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.2.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility9.3.5indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/phpcompatibility-paragonie1.3.3indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/phpcompatibility-wp2.1.5indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsextra1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpcsstandards/phpcsutils1.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.32indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.21indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.10.3indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.3indirect
Packagistwp-coding-standards/wpcs3.1.0indirect
Packagistwp-phpunit/wp-phpunit6.6.2indirect
Packagistyoast/phpunit-polyfills1.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 169 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
simple-git3.25.0indirectcritical33.36.0
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh45.0.8
js-yaml3.14.1indirecthigh34.3.0
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
phpunit/phpunit9.6.21indirecthigh112.5.8
tmp0.0.33indirecthigh20.2.6
wp-coding-standards/wpcs3.1.0indirecthigh13.4.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.