Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 02:21 UTC

acorncom / ember-google-maps

A lightweight, declarative, composable API for building ambitious map UIs in your Ember apps.

JavaScript · TypeScriptCustom license★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince May 2018forkView on GitHub ↗

acorncom/ember-google-maps holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (63/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 39 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

David BakerPersonal account
94 followers211 public repossince May 2011Acorn Web Consultants

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmember-google-maps8.1.09,3578339 days agoember-addongoogle-mapsg-mapgooglemapmaps

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 39 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
17.1/18Commit volume — 79 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year79
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push39
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv8.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.9/80Monthly downloads — 9,357 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesember-google-maps
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,357
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.894
How it's scored
15.1/42Issue resolution — 36% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance — 22/25 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs22
open_issues16
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.36
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.2/25Owner reach — 94 followers of acorncom
25/25Track record — 211 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers94
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginacorncom
public_repos211
account_age_days5,628
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history — 83 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesember-google-maps
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://acorncom.github.io/ember-google-maps
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://acorncom.github.io/ember-google-maps
docs_sitehttps://acorncom.github.io/ember-google-maps
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 115 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
14.4/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: sprintf-js 1.1.3 (moderate 5.3)
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages329
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:ember-google-maps@8.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 329 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.879
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — ember-google-maps/tsconfig.json, test-app-basic/tsconfig.json, verify-published-types/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 37 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsember-google-maps/tsconfig.json, test-app-basic/tsconfig.json, verify-published-types/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.37
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (ember-google-maps/tsconfig.json, test-app-basic/tsconfig.json, verify-published-types/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes14,893
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
12contributors
79commits, last 12 months
39days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
16open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 02:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 1/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities115 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@glimmer/component^2.1.1docs-app/package.json
npm@glimmer/tracking^1.1.2docs-app/package.json
npmember-google-mapsworkspace:*docs-app/package.json
npmember-google-maps-directionsworkspace:*docs-app/package.json
npmember-provide-consume-context0.10.0docs-app/package.json
npmember-source~6.12.0docs-app/package.json
npm@embroider/addon-shim^1.8.9ember-google-maps-directions/package.json
npm@embroider/macros^1.20.5ember-google-maps-directions/package.json
npmdecorator-transforms^2.2.2ember-google-maps-directions/package.json
npmember-concurrency^5.0.0ember-google-maps-directions/package.json
npm@ember/string^4.0.0ember-google-maps/package.json
npm@ember/test-waiters^4.0.0ember-google-maps/package.json
npm@embroider/addon-shim^1.8.9ember-google-maps/package.json
npm@embroider/macros^1.20.5ember-google-maps/package.json
npmdecorator-transforms^2.2.2ember-google-maps/package.json
npmember-modifier^4.3.0ember-google-maps/package.json
npmrsvp^4.8.5ember-google-maps/package.json
npm@embroider/addon-shim^1.8.9test-addon-clusterer/package.json
npm@embroider/macros^1.20.5test-addon-clusterer/package.json
npm@googlemaps/markerclusterer^2.6.2test-addon-clusterer/package.json
npmdecorator-transforms^2.2.2test-addon-clusterer/package.json
npmember-google-mapsworkspace:*test-addon-clusterer/package.json
npmember-google-mapsworkspace:*test-app-basic/package.json
npmember-google-maps-directionsworkspace:*test-app-basic/package.json
npmember-provide-consume-context^0.10.0test-app-basic/package.json
npmtest-addon-clustererworkspace:*test-app-basic/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 1

Installing npm:ember-google-maps@8.1.0 pulls in 329 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sprintf-js1.1.3indirectmoderate1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.