Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 04:25 UTC

acusti / uikit

UI toolkit monorepo containing a React component library, UI utilities, a drag-and-drop library, and more

TypeScriptUnlicense★ 9 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

acusti/uikit holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andrew PattonPersonal account
50 followers143 public repossince Dec 2010@outlyne

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume358 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year358
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars9
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Unlicense)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges20
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.2/80Monthly downloads4,885 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@acusti/post, @acusti/parsing, @acusti/styling, @acusti/textual, @acusti/dropdown, @acusti/uniquify, @acusti/css-values, @acusti/input-text
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,885
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.983
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
15.2/30PR acceptance199/393 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs199
open_issues0
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d21
prs_decided_30d21
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs194
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach50 followers of acusti
25/25Track record143 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers50
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginacusti
public_repos143
account_age_days5,714
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history112 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@acusti/post, @acusti/parsing, @acusti/styling, @acusti/textual, @acusti/dropdown, @acusti/uniquify, @acusti/css-values, @acusti/input-text
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://uikit.acusti.ca/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsuikit, component-library, frontend
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://uikit.acusti.ca/
docs_sitehttps://uikit.acusti.ca/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history89 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.918
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,963
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingpackages/appsync-fetch/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-signature-v4/tsconfig.json, packages/css-value-input/tsconfig.json, packages/css-values/tsconfig.json, packages/date-picker/tsconfig.json, packages/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/dropdown/tsconfig.json, packages/input-text/tsconfig.json, packages/matchmaking/tsconfig.json, packages/parsing/tsconfig.json, packages/post/tsconfig.json, packages/styling/tsconfig.json, packages/textual/tsconfig.json, packages/uniquify/tsconfig.json, packages/use-bounding-client-rect/tsconfig.json, packages/use-is-out-of-bounds/tsconfig.json, packages/use-keyboard-events/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugin-svg-react/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice69 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/appsync-fetch/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-signature-v4/tsconfig.json, packages/css-value-input/tsconfig.json, packages/css-values/tsconfig.json, packages/date-picker/tsconfig.json, packages/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/dropdown/tsconfig.json, packages/input-text/tsconfig.json, packages/matchmaking/tsconfig.json, packages/parsing/tsconfig.json, packages/post/tsconfig.json, packages/styling/tsconfig.json, packages/textual/tsconfig.json, packages/uniquify/tsconfig.json, packages/use-bounding-client-rect/tsconfig.json, packages/use-is-out-of-bounds/tsconfig.json, packages/use-keyboard-events/tsconfig.json, packages/vite-plugin-svg-react/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.69
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes3/87 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes87,335
source_files_sampled87
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

9GitHub stars
2contributors
358commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 04:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@changesets/cli^2.29.8package.json
npm@acusti/aws-signature-v4^2.0.0packages/appsync-fetch/package.json
npm@acusti/post^1.2.0packages/appsync-fetch/package.json
npm@acusti/css-values^1.2.0packages/css-value-input/package.json
npm@acusti/input-text^2.4.3packages/css-value-input/package.json
npmclsx^2packages/css-value-input/package.json
npmclsx^2packages/date-picker/package.json
npm@acusti/matchmaking^0.10.0packages/dropdown/package.json
npm@acusti/use-keyboard-events^0.11.1packages/dropdown/package.json
npmclsx^2packages/dropdown/package.json
npm@acusti/use-bounding-client-rect^2.0.0packages/use-is-out-of-bounds/package.json
npm@svgr/core^8.1packages/vite-plugin-svg-react/package.json
npm@svgr/plugin-jsx^8.1packages/vite-plugin-svg-react/package.json
All dependencies 39

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@acusti/aws-signature-v4^2.0.0direct
npm@acusti/css-values^1.2.0direct
npm@acusti/input-text^2.4.3direct
npm@acusti/matchmaking^0.10.0direct
npm@acusti/post^1.2.0direct
npm@acusti/use-bounding-client-rect^2.0.0direct
npm@acusti/use-keyboard-events^0.11.1direct
npm@changesets/cli^2.29.8direct
npm@svgr/core^8.1direct
npm@svgr/plugin-jsx^8.1direct
npmclsx^2direct
npm@babel/core^7.29.7indirect
npm@rolldown/plugin-babel^0.2.3indirect
npm@storybook/addon-docs^10indirect
npm@storybook/react-vite^10indirect
npm@testing-library/dom^10.4.1indirect
npm@testing-library/react^16.3.2indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event^14.6.1indirect
npm@types/babel__core^7.20.5indirect
npm@types/node^26.1.0indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.17indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^6.0.1indirect
npmbabel-plugin-react-compiler^1indirect
npmcore-js^3.48.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-perfectionist^5.9.1indirect
npmhappy-dom^20.10.6indirect
npmhappy-dom^20.4.0indirect
npmoxfmt^0.57.0indirect
npmoxlint^1.72.0indirect
npmoxlint-tsgolint^0.24.0indirect
npmreact^19indirect
npmreact^19.2.7indirect
npmreact-dom^19indirect
npmreact-dom^19.2.7indirect
npmstorybook^10indirect
npmtypescript^7indirect
npmvite^8indirect
npmvite^8.0.0-0indirect
npmvitest^4indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.