Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 12:27 UTC

adham90 / ruby_llm-agents

A Rails agent framework for RubyLLM — define AI agents with prompts, schemas, caching, logging, cost tracking, and a built-in dashboard for monitoring LLM usage in production.

RubyMIT★ 139 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined
#dashboard#gem#llm#monitoring#rails

adham90/ruby_llm-agents holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Adham EL-DeebPersonal account
29 followers114 public repossince Jun 2013@ScieNFT

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsruby_llm-agents3.16.0-5510 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 10 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 599 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year599
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 46 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~23.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tagv3.16.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases23.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak
How it's scored
34.7/60Stars — 139 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars139
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.6/80Total downloads — 30,210 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesruby_llm-agents
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads30,210
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.992

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
38/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 17/18 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues2
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.905
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach — 29 followers of adham90
25/25Track record — 114 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginadham90
public_repos114
account_age_days4,866
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history — 55 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesruby_llm-agents
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_llm-agents
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdashboard, gem, llm, monitoring, rails
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_llm-agents
docs_sitehttps://rubygems.org/gems/ruby_llm-agents
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 71 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories71
affected_packages19
assessed_packages117
unassessed_packages18
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 9, moderate 4, low 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 117 resolved dependencies against OSV. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.77
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,188

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 71 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.71
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 2/482 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes86,357
source_files_sampled482
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

139GitHub stars
3contributors
599commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
46releases
1bus factor
2open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012025-122026-052026-10
Major 2Minor 22Patch 18
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 12:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7CI-Tests7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities71 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsirb—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake~> 13.0Gemfile
RubyGemsstandard~> 1.3Gemfile
All dependencies 135

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsirb1.16.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.3.1direct
RubyGemsstandard1.53.0direct
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.16indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.8indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.0.1indirect
RubyGemsbrakeman—indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit—indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.6indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemscsv—indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.5indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-active_record2.2.2indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner-core2.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdocile1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.1indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsevent_stream_parser1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.5.6indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails6.5.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.2indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.3.0indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.8indirect
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.19.3indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.5indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.0indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.1indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.0indirect
RubyGemsostruct—indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.27.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.10.1indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.8.0indirect
RubyGemspropshaft—indirect
RubyGemspsych5.3.1indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.2indirect
RubyGemspuma—indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrails—indirect
RubyGemsrails8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrails-controller-testing1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc7.1.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.11.3indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec-rails7.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.82.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.49.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails-omakase—indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_llm—indirect
RubyGemsruby_llm1.16.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_llm-agents—indirect
RubyGemsruby_llm-schema0.3.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov0.22.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-html0.13.2indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_json_formatter0.1.4indirect
RubyGemssolid_cable—indirect
RubyGemssolid_cache—indirect
RubyGemssolid_queue—indirect
RubyGemssqlite3—indirect
RubyGemssqlite32.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.0indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsturbo-rails—indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemsvcr6.4.0indirect
RubyGemsweb-console—indirect
RubyGemswebmock3.26.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.0indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.7.5indirect
Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 117 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activestorage8.1.2indirectcritical68.1.3.1
rack-session2.1.1indirectcritical12.1.2
activesupport8.1.2indirecthigh38.1.2.1
addressable2.8.8indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.3.6indirecthigh31.3.7
erb6.0.1indirecthigh16.0.4
faraday2.14.1indirecthigh22.14.3
nokogiri1.19.0indirecthigh111.19.4
rack3.2.4indirecthigh153.2.6
sqlite32.9.0indirecthigh32.9.6
websocket-driver0.8.0indirecthigh40.8.2
action_text-trix2.1.16indirectmoderate32.1.18
loofah2.25.0indirectmoderate52.25.2
mail2.9.0indirectmoderate12.9.1
net-imap0.6.2indirectmoderate80.6.4.1
actionpack8.1.2indirectlow18.1.2.1
actionview8.1.2indirectlow18.1.2.1
json2.19.3indirectlow12.19.9
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirectlow11.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with adham90/ruby_llm-agents. Read them side by side →

98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional97primer/octiconsA scalable set of icons handcrafted with ❤️ by GitHubExceptional96grafana/grafanaThe open and composable observability and data visualization platform. Visualize metrics, logs, and traces from multiple sources like Prometheus, Loki, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, Postgres and many more. Exceptional96Canner/WrenAIGenBI (Generative BI) for AI agents, an open-source, governed text-to-SQL through an open context layer that turns natural-language questions into trusted dashboards, charts, and SQL across 20+ data sources, such as BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Amazon Redshift, Databricks and more.Exceptional96perses/persesThe CNCF sandbox for observability visualisation. Already supports Prometheus, Tempo, Loki and Pyroscope - more data sources to come!Exceptional96langfuse/langfuse🪢 Open source agent evals & observability: Trace, evaluate, and improve LLM applications with one open platform.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.