Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-07 05:02 UTC

aerospike / aerospike-client-rust

Rust client for the Aerospike database

RustCustom license★ 100 stars⑂ 41 forkssince Jul 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#aerospike#rust#nosql#database-driver

aerospike/aerospike-client-rust holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AerospikeOrganization · verified domain
258 followers119 public repossince Aug 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioaerospike2.2.013,266282 days agoaerospikedatabasedistributednosql
crates.ioaerospike-rt2.2.010,237162 days agoaerospikedatabasedistributednosql
crates.ioaerospike-core2.2.09,288162 days agoaerospikedatabasedistributednosql
crates.ioaerospike-sync2.2.0148162 days agoaerospikedatabasedistributednosql
crates.ioaerospike-macro2.2.010,186162 days agoaerospikedatabasedistributednosql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 205 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year205
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 27 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~25.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases25.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

55Moderate
How it's scored
32.4/60Stars — 100 stars
13.4/25Forks — 41 forks
9.4/15Watchers — 50 watchers
Inputs used
forks41
stars100
watchers50
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

59Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

77Good
How it's scored
61.8/80Monthly downloads — 43,125 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaerospike, aerospike-rt, aerospike-core, aerospike-sync, aerospike-macro
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads817,053
monthly_downloads43,125
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.413

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate
How it's scored
28/42Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
24.6/30PR acceptance — 124/151 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs124
open_issues28
closed_issues56
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d17
prs_decided_30d20
issue_closed_ratio0.667
closed_unmerged_prs27
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
17.4/25Owner reach — 258 followers of aerospike
25/25Track record — 119 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers258
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginaerospike
public_repos119
account_age_days5,126

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 28 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaerospike, aerospike-rt, aerospike-core, aerospike-sync, aerospike-macro
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.aerospike.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaerospike, rust, nosql, database-driver
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.aerospike.com/
docs_sitehttps://www.aerospike.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

22At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
22.4/40Legible commit history — 42 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.42
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, aerospike-core/Cargo.toml, aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, aerospike-core/Cargo.toml, aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml, aerospike-rt/Cargo.toml, aerospike-sync/Cargo.toml, tools/benchmark/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 2/171 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes94,167
source_files_sampled171
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

100GitHub stars
21contributors
205commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
27releases
2bus factor
28open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 41 ⇿
0Stars
41Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030403922017-052022-012026-08
Major 2Minor 9Patch 1

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-07 05:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioaerospike-core2.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-sync2.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-macro2.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobyteorder1.5aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioripemd0.2aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iolazy_static1.5aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0.18aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iopwhash1.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-rt2.2.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.32aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.89aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorhexdump0.2.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26.4aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.23.40aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-channel2.5.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.6aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohazarc0.2.0aerospike-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0.117aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.45aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-rt2.2.0aerospike-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.52.1aerospike-rt/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-std1.13.2aerospike-rt/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-lock3.4.2aerospike-rt/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-core2.2.0aerospike-sync/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.32aerospike-sync/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaerospike-rt2.2.0aerospike-sync/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaerospike-core—direct
crates.ioaerospike-macro—direct
crates.ioaerospike-rt—direct
crates.ioaerospike-sync—direct
crates.ioasync-channel—direct
crates.ioasync-lock—direct
crates.ioasync-std—direct
crates.ioasync-trait—direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobyteorder—direct
crates.iofutures—direct
crates.iohazarc—direct
crates.iolazy_static—direct
crates.iolog—direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.iopwhash—direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.iorhexdump—direct
crates.ioripemd—direct
crates.iorustls—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.iosocket2—direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotokio-rustls—direct
crates.iobencher—indirect
crates.iochrono—indirect
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.ioenv_logger—indirect
crates.iohex—indirect
crates.ioproptest—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with aerospike/aerospike-client-rust. Read them side by side →

98valkey-io/valkey-glideAn open source Valkey client library that supports Valkey, and Redis open source 6.2, 7.0 and 7.2. Valkey GLIDE is designed for reliability, optimized performance, and high-availability, for Valkey and Redis OSS based applications. GLIDE is a multi language client library, written in Rust with programming language bindings, such as Java and PythonExceptional96surrealdb/surrealdbA scalable, distributed, collaborative, document-graph database, for the realtime webExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional99ai-dynamo/dynamoA Datacenter Scale Distributed Inference Serving FrameworkExceptional98Eventual-Inc/DaftHigh-performance data engine for AI and multimodal workloads. Process images, audio, video, and structured data at any scaleExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.