Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 15:39 UTC

agentflocks / flocks

Flocks is an agentic SecOps platform.

Python · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 419 stars⑂ 79 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined
#agent#flocks#secops

agentflocks/flocks holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Security (40/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AgentFlocksOrganization
12 followers2 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,566 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,566
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv2026.7.15
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases5.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate
How it's scored
42.5/60Stars — 419 stars
15.8/25Forks — 79 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks79
stars419
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

51Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.445

Issue & PR responsiveness

92Excellent
How it's scored
40.1/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 510/541 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs510
open_issues1
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.955
closed_unmerged_prs31
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of AgentFlocks
4.1/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginAgentFlocks
public_repos2
account_age_days123
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, flocks, secops
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 179 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,909
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — tui/tsconfig.json, webui/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstui/tsconfig.json, webui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (tui/tsconfig.json, webui/tsconfig.json)
54/55Manageable file sizes — 47/2,694 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes205,270
source_files_sampled2,694
oversized_source_files47

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

419GitHub stars
15contributors
1,566commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
38releases
2bus factor
1open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package '@flocks-ai/flocks' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'flocks' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 15:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests2 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 12/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities179 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 145
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIfastapi>=0.109.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.9pyproject.toml
PyPIsse-starlette>=1.8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.13.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.5pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.7pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.9.0,<0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlitellm==1.83.7pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.86.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-genai>=0.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles>=23.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter>=0.21.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchdog>=4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython>=3.1.41pyproject.toml
PyPIpygls>=1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlsprotocol>=2023.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.25pyproject.toml
PyPIulid-py>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema>=4.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIstriprtf>=0.0.26pyproject.toml
PyPIclaude>=0.4.11pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcroniter>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlangfuse—pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncssh>=2.22.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwecom-aibot-sdk>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlark-oapi>=1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdingtalk-stream>=0.20pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-socks>=2.8.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz>=2026.1.post1pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdf>=6.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPImarkitdown>=0.1.5pyproject.toml
PyPIpymupdf>=1.27.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIolefile>=0.47pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml>=0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown>=3.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIcdp-use>=1.4.5pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=12.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdatasketch>=1.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiokafka>=0.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIddddocr>=1.6.1pyproject.toml
npm@opentui/core0.1.74tui/package.json
npm@opentui/solid0.1.74tui/package.json
npmopentui-spinner0.0.6tui/package.json
npmsolid-js1.9.10tui/package.json
npm@solid-primitives/event-bus1.1.2tui/package.json
npm@solid-primitives/scheduled1.5.2tui/package.json
npmclipboardy4.0.0tui/package.json
npmyargs18.0.0tui/package.json
npmfuzzysort3.1.0tui/package.json
npmopen10.1.2tui/package.json
npmulid3.0.1tui/package.json
npmzod4.1.8tui/package.json
npmremeda2.26.0tui/package.json
npmdiff8.0.2tui/package.json
npmignore7.0.5tui/package.json
npmchokidar4.0.3tui/package.json
npmminimatch10.0.3tui/package.json
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.1tui/package.json
npmweb-tree-sitter0.25.10tui/package.json
npmtree-sitter-bash0.25.0tui/package.json
npmstrip-ansi7.1.2tui/package.json
npmgray-matter4.0.3tui/package.json
npmpartial-json0.1.7tui/package.json
npmturndown7.2.0tui/package.json
npmjsonc-parser3.3.1tui/package.json
npm@pierre/diffs1.0.2tui/package.json
npmhono4.10.7tui/package.json
npmhono-openapi1.1.2tui/package.json
npm@hono/zod-validator0.4.2tui/package.json
npm@hono/standard-validator0.1.5tui/package.json
npmbonjour-service1.3.0tui/package.json
npmvscode-jsonrpc8.2.1tui/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.25.2tui/package.json
npm@zip.js/zip.js2.7.62tui/package.json
npmdecimal.js10.5.0tui/package.json
npmai5.0.119tui/package.json
npmbun-pty0.4.4tui/package.json
npm@clack/prompts1.0.0-alpha.1tui/package.json
npm@standard-schema/spec1.0.0tui/package.json
npmzod-to-json-schema3.24.5tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/amazon-bedrock3.0.73tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/anthropic2.0.57tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/azure2.0.91tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/cerebras1.0.34tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/cohere2.0.22tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/deepinfra1.0.31tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/gateway2.0.25tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/google2.0.52tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/google-vertex3.0.97tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/groq2.0.34tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/mistral2.0.27tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/openai2.0.89tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/openai-compatible1.0.30tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/perplexity2.0.23tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/provider2.0.1tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/provider-utils3.0.20tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/togetherai1.0.31tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/vercel1.0.31tui/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/xai2.0.51tui/package.json
npm@openrouter/ai-sdk-provider1.5.2tui/package.json
npm@gitlab/gitlab-ai-provider3.1.2tui/package.json
npm@agentclientprotocol/sdk0.5.1tui/package.json
npm@actions/core1.11.1tui/package.json
npm@actions/github6.0.1tui/package.json
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.2tui/package.json
npm@octokit/rest22.0.0tui/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-types3.17.5tui/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/typography^0.5.19webui/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.10.0webui/package.json
npmaxios^1.6.7webui/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.0webui/package.json
npmdate-fns^3.3.1webui/package.json
npmi18next^25.8.14webui/package.json
npmi18next-browser-languagedetector^8.2.1webui/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.562.0webui/package.json
npmpdfjs-dist^6.1.200webui/package.json
npmqrcode.react^4.2.0webui/package.json
npmreact^19.2.0webui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0webui/package.json
npmreact-i18next^16.5.6webui/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0webui/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.12.0webui/package.json
npmrecharts^2.15.0webui/package.json
npmrehype-highlight^7.0.2webui/package.json
npmrehype-raw^7.0.0webui/package.json
npmrehype-sanitize^6.0.0webui/package.json
npmremark-breaks^4.0.0webui/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1webui/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.2.1webui/package.json
npmzustand^4.5.0webui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with agentflocks/flocks. Read them side by side →

98github/copilot-sdkMulti-platform SDK for integrating GitHub Copilot Agent into apps and servicesExceptional98awslabs/generative-ai-cdk-constructsAWS Generative AI CDK Constructs are sample implementations of AWS CDK for common generative AI patterns.Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.