Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 15:10 UTC

agentic-research / mache

IDE-style navigation for structured data — code, JSON, YAML. Jump to definitions, find callers, follow references. Available as an MCP server or a mounted folder.

C · GoApache-2.0★ 41 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#agentic-research#capnproto#cobra#code-intelligence#fuse-filesystem#go#knowledge-graph#mcp#model-context-protocol#tree-sitter#art-ecosystem

agentic-research/mache holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (57/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Agentic ResearchOrganization
2 followers12 public repossince Aug 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/agentic-research/machev0.17.0-344 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 612 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year612
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk
How it's scored
26/60Stars — 41 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars41
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.894

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
30/42Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
29.3/30PR acceptance — 510/522 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs510
open_issues2
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.714
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of agentic-research
10/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginagentic-research
public_repos12
account_age_days348
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/agentic-research/mache
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/agentic-research/mache
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagentic-research, capnproto, cobra, code-intelligence, fuse-filesystem, go, knowledge-graph, mcp, model-context-protocol, tree-sitter, art-ecosystem
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pkg.go.dev/github.com/agentic-research/mache
docs_sitehttps://pkg.go.dev/github.com/agentic-research/mache
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

70Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate7

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

91Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,809
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

96Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 8/536 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC
largest_source_bytes12,847,341
source_files_sampled536
oversized_source_files8

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — cmd/testdata/preset_fixtures/protobuf/catalog.proto
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filescmd/testdata/preset_fixtures/protobuf/catalog.proto
interfaces_expected_of—

Key facts

41GitHub stars
3contributors
612commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10
7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 15:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocapnproto.org/go/capnp/v3v3.1.0-alpha.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/RoaringBitmap/roaringv1.9.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/agentic-research/ley-line-open/clients/go/leyline-schemav0.7.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-task/task/v3v3.52.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.56.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ohler55/ojgv1.28.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/smacker/go-tree-sitterv0.0.0-20240827094217-dd81d9e9be82go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/willscott/go-nfsv0.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/zeebo/blake3v0.2.4go.mod
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0go.mod
Gomvdan.cc/gofumptv0.10.0go.mod
Gomvdan.cc/sh/v3v3.13.2-0.20260613075524-2255122b577bgo.mod
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocapnproto.org/go/capnp/v3v3.1.0-alpha.2direct
Gogithub.com/agentic-research/ley-line-open/clients/go/leyline-schemav0.7.1direct
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-task/task/v3v3.52.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0direct
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.56.0direct
Gogithub.com/ohler55/ojgv1.28.2direct
Gogithub.com/roaringbitmap/roaringv1.9.4direct
Gogithub.com/smacker/go-tree-sitterv0.0.0-20240827094217-dd81d9e9be82direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/willscott/go-nfsv0.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/zeebo/blake3v0.2.4direct
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.42.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.49.1direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0direct
Gomvdan.cc/gofumptv0.10.0direct
Gomvdan.cc/sh/v3v3.13.2-0.20260613075524-2255122b577bdirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bits-and-blooms/bitsetv1.24.4indirect
Gogithub.com/colega/zeropoolv0.0.0-20230505084239-6fb4a4f75381indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/dominikbraun/graphv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/elliotchance/orderedmap/v3v3.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mschoch/smatv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/rasky/go-xdrv0.0.0-20170124162913-1a41d1a06c93indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/willscott/go-nfs-clientv0.0.0-20240104095149-b44639837b00indirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.16.3indirect
Gogithub.com/zeebo/assertv1.3.0indirect
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.4.3indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.72.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.73.4indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with agentic-research/mache. Read them side by side →

95trpc-group/trpc-agent-goA Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, evaluation, and observability.Exceptional99stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional99modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkThe official Go SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients. Maintained in collaboration with Google.Exceptional99stackloklabs/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional98google/adk-goAn open-source, code-first Go toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional96rclone/rclone"rsync for cloud storage" - Google Drive, S3, Dropbox, Backblaze B2, One Drive, Swift, Hubic, Wasabi, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob, Azure Files, Yandex FilesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.