Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 16:40 UTC

agledger-ai / sdk

AGLedger™ SDK — Accountability and audit infrastructure for agentic systems. Patent Pending.

TypeScriptCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

agledger-ai/sdk holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AGLedgerOrganization
1 follower7 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
12.9/18Commit volume26 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year26
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases12 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tagv1.3.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44/80Monthly downloads2,001 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@agledger/sdk
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,001
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance0/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of agledger-ai
7.3/25Track record7 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginagledger-ai
public_repos7
account_age_days126
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history47 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@agledger/sdk
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://agledger.ai
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://agledger.ai
docs_sitehttps://agledger.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes1/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes105,721
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
26commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 16:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@agledger/verify-core^1.0.0package.json
npmhttp-message-signatures^1.0.5package.json
All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 143 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@agledger/verify-core1.0.0direct
npmhttp-message-signatures1.0.6direct
npm@andrewbranch/untar.js1.0.3indirect
npm@arethetypeswrong/cli0.18.4indirect
npm@arethetypeswrong/core0.18.4indirect
npm@braidai/lang1.1.2indirect
npm@colors/colors1.5.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@loaderkit/resolve1.0.6indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@publint/pack0.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is4.6.0indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node24.13.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmansi-escapes7.3.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmcborg5.1.1indirect
npmcborg5.1.3indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchar-regex1.0.2indirect
npmcjs-module-lexer1.4.3indirect
npmcli-highlight2.1.11indirect
npmcli-table30.6.5indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander10.0.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemojilib2.4.0indirect
npmenvironment1.1.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfflate0.8.3indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhighlight.js10.7.3indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmarked9.1.6indirect
npmmarked-terminal7.3.0indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmnode-emoji2.2.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector1.6.0indirect
npmparse55.1.1indirect
npmparse56.0.1indirect
npmparse5-htmlparser2-tree-adapter6.0.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmprettier3.8.4indirect
npmpublint0.3.21indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmskin-tone2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstructured-headers2.0.2indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-hyperlinks3.2.0indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript5.6.1-rcindirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmunicode-emoji-modifier-base1.0.0indirect
npmvalidate-npm-package-name5.0.1indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.2indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.