Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 15:22 UTC

ai-dynamo / frontend-crates

Rust · PythonApache-2.0★ 16 stars⑂ 18 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

ai-dynamo/frontend-crates holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (82/100) and lowest on Vitality (45/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DynamoOrganization
770 followers15 public repossince Mar 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodynamo-renderer5.1.086,283245 days agochat-templateinferencejinjallmprompt
crates.iodynamo-protocols5.3.186,0221914 days agoanthropicgenaiinferencellmopenai
crates.iodynamo-tokenizers1.8.099,4901617 days agohuggingfaceinferencellmtiktokentokenizer

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 207 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year207
human_commit_share0.62
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

29At Risk
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
10.3/25Forks — 18 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars16
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

91Excellent
How it's scored
72.5/80Monthly downloads — 271,795 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdynamo-renderer, dynamo-protocols, dynamo-tokenizers
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads815,385
monthly_downloads271,795
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.451

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance — 143/162 decided PRs merged
10.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs143
open_issues4
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d41
prs_decided_30d47
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d6

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.8/25Owner reach — 770 followers of ai-dynamo
11.7/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers770
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginai-dynamo
public_repos15
account_age_days536

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 24 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdynamo-renderer, dynamo-protocols, dynamo-tokenizers
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/dynamo-renderer
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/dynamo-renderer
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — protocols/AGENTS.md, protocols/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 62 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesprotocols/AGENTS.md, protocols/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,693

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — examples/dynamo-demo-server/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesexamples/dynamo-demo-server/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, conformance/Cargo.toml, examples/dynamo-demo-server/Cargo.toml, parsers/v1/Cargo.toml, parsers/v2-py/Cargo.toml, parsers/v2/Cargo.toml, protocols/Cargo.toml, renderer/Cargo.toml, tokenizers/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.6/55Manageable file sizes — 14/227 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes187,396
source_files_sampled227
oversized_source_files14

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
21contributors
207commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
4open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 16 authors (cap 12)
  • Could not fetch crates package 'dynamo-conformance-fixtures-v2' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201822026-052026-072026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 15:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioasync-openai—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_builder—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—protocols/Cargo.toml
crates.iodynamo-protocols—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.iodynamo-tokenizers—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeither—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.iominijinja—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.iominijinja-contrib—renderer/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaho-corasick—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iobasetenkenizer—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake3—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iomoka—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastokens—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iostrum—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase64—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-hash—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iotiktoken-rs—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokenizers—tokenizers/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ai-dynamo/frontend-crates. Read them side by side →

96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional97redis/redis-vl-pythonRedis Vector Library (RedisVL) -- the AI-native Python client for Redis.Exceptional97langchain4j/langchain4jLangChain4j is an idiomatic, open-source Java library for building LLM-powered applications on the JVM. It offers a unified API over popular LLM providers and vector stores, and makes implementing tool calling (including MCP support), agents and RAG easy. It integrates seamlessly with enterprise Java frameworks like Quarkus and Spring Boot.Exceptional96JetBrains/koogKoog is a JVM (Java and Kotlin) framework for building predictable, fault-tolerant and enterprise-ready AI agents across all platforms – from backend services to Android and iOS, JVM, and even in-browser environments. Koog is based on our AI products expertise and provides proven solutions for complex LLM and AI problemsExceptional96strands-agents/toolsA set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.Exceptional96yamadashy/repomix📦 Repomix is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI-friendly file. Perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Gemini, Gemma, Llama, Grok, and more.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.