Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-07 20:08 UTC

akeneo / api-php-client

PHP client of Akeneo PIM API

PHPCustom license★ 96 stars⑂ 64 forkssince Apr 2017View on GitHub ↗

#php-client #akeneo #pim #rest #api #api-client #php

akeneo/api-php-client holds a health index of 32 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 638 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AkeneoOrganization

193 followers51 public repossince Oct 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	akeneo/api-php-client	V11.4.0	48,637	27	682 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 638 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredissues left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 638 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	638
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

60Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 25 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 682 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~94.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	25
latest_release_tag	V11.4.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	682
mean_days_between_releases	94.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate

How it's scored

32.1/60	Stars — 96 stars
15/25	Forks — 64 forks
8.4/15	Watchers — 34 watchers

Inputs used

forks	64
stars	96
watchers	34
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

64Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	circleci.com, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good

How it's scored

62.5/80	Monthly downloads — 48,637 downloads/month across packagist
8.7/20	Registry dependents — 19 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	akeneo/api-php-client
dependents	19
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	3,596,197
monthly_downloads	48,637

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

72Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	35
top_contributor_share	0.283

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

30.4/42	Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
23.1/30	PR acceptance — 175/227 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	175
open_issues	18
closed_issues	47
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.723
closed_unmerged_prs	52
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.4/25	Owner reach — 193 followers of akeneo
24.5/25	Track record — 51 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	193
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	akeneo
public_repos	51
account_age_days	5,051

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 682 days ago
20/20	Version history — 27 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	akeneo/api-php-client
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	682

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://packagist.org/packages/akeneo/api-php-client
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	php-client, akeneo, pim, rest, api, api-client, php
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://packagist.org/packages/akeneo/api-php-client
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	3.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, dangerous_workflow, packaging, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	19
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	78
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 78 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

31At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.6/40	Legible commit history — 55 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.573
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/249 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	18,756
source_files_sampled	249
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

96GitHub stars

35contributors

0commits, last 12 months

638days since last push

25releases

3bus factor

18open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 64 ⇿

0Stars

64Forks

25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 10Minor 4Patch 8

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10

3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-07 20:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 5

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-client	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-message-implementation	`^1.0\|^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`^5.4\|^6.0\|^7.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 78

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	direct
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`6.4.8`	direct
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.3`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/annotations	`1.14.4`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/lexer	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	donatj/mock-webserver	`2.7.2`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.9.5`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.9.2`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	http-interop/http-factory-guzzle	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.12.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-cs-fixer/diff	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/discovery	`1.19.4`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/guzzle7-adapter	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/httplug	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/multipart-stream-builder	`1.4.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/promise	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`5.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`1.8.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/php-diff	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/phpspec	`7.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpspec/prophecy	`1.19.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`1.12.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`7.0.17`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`2.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`2.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-token-stream	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`8.5.40`	indirect
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	rector/rector	`0.14.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`4.2.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`3.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`1.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.12`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`6.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`6.4.12`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`6.4.11`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.31.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`6.4.12`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`6.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`4.4.45`	indirect
Packagist	symplify/easy-coding-standard	`11.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.11.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 78 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.9.2`	indirect	high	9	`8.0.1`
phpunit/phpunit	`8.5.40`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`
symfony/process	`6.4.12`	indirect	high	2	`8.0.5`
guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.7.0`	indirect	moderate	4	`2.12.3`
symfony/yaml	`4.4.45`	indirect	moderate	3	`8.0.12`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records