Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 05:19 UTC

akkadotnet / Akka.MultiNodeTestRunner

Infrastructure for facilitating multi-node testing in Akka.NET

C#Custom license★ 6 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗

akkadotnet/Akka.MultiNodeTestRunner holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (51/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (24/100). It was last updated 147 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akka.NETOrganization
198 followers41 public repossince Mar 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 147 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18Commit volume8 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year8
human_commit_share0.38
days_since_last_push147
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases20 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 218 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~107.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tag1.5.60
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release218
mean_days_between_releases107.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars6
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.593
How it's scored
27.3/42Issue resolution65% of issues closed
13/30PR acceptance143/329 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs143
open_issues7
closed_issues13
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.65
closed_unmerged_prs186
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.5/25Owner reach198 followers of akkadotnet
23.8/25Track record41 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers198
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginakkadotnet
public_repos41
account_age_days4,564

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

24At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history35 of 38 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.921
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost.csproj, src/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.csproj, src/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance62 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost/Akka.MultiNode.RemoteHost.csproj, src/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.csproj, src/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj, src/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.62
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes26,058
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
3contributors
8commits, last 12 months
147days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
7open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
18Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

2334455522020-012022-122025-10
Major 1Minor 2Patch 10

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 05:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests11 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAkka.Cluster.TestKitsrc/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdksrc/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests/Akka.MultiNode.SampleMultiNodeTests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collectorsrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdksrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertionssrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudiosrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.Tests.csproj
NuGetAkka.Cluster.TestKitsrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
NuGetTeamCity.ServiceMessagessrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
NuGetSystem.CodeDomsrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Loadersrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.utilitysrc/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter/Akka.MultiNode.TestAdapter.csproj
All dependencies 9

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAkka.Cluster.TestKitdirect
NuGetcoverlet.collectordirect
NuGetFluentAssertionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkdirect
NuGetSystem.CodeDomdirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Loaderdirect
NuGetTeamCity.ServiceMessagesdirect
NuGetxunit.runner.utilitydirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudiodirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.