Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 11:41 UTC

akshettrj / watgbridge

A forwarder from WhatsApp to Telegram written in GoLang

GoMIT★ 296 stars⑂ 70 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

akshettrj/watgbridge holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (49/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Akshett Rai JindalPersonal account
59 followers31 public repossince Jul 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 10 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume — 88 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year88
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year24
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 40 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count40
latest_release_tagv1.13.11
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases19.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.1/60Stars — 296 stars
15.3/25Forks — 70 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks70
stars296
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.784
How it's scored
30.4/42Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
16.5/30PR acceptance — 22/40 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs22
open_issues13
closed_issues34
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.723
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.8/25Owner reach — 59 followers of akshettrj
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers59
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginakshettrj
public_repos31
account_age_days2,252
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbridge, go, golang, telegram-bot, whatsapp-bot, whatsapp-web, telegram, whatsapp, bot, whatsmeow, hacktoberfest, hacktoberfest-accepted
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages1
assessed_packages52
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 52 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 83 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.874
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes63,207
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

296GitHub stars
12contributors
88commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
40releases
1bus factor
13open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 70 ⇿
0Stars
70Forks
40Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756922022-112024-102026-09
Major 0Minor 11Patch 29

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 11:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
7CI-Tests3 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/PaulSonOfLars/gotgbot/v2v2.0.0-rc.35go.mod
Gogithub.com/emersion/go-vcardv0.0.0-20260618161152-d854b7e0e2d3go.mod
Gogithub.com/forPelevin/gomojiv1.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-co-op/gocronv1.37.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lithammer/fuzzysearchv1.1.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.48go.mod
Gogithub.com/mdp/qrterminal/v3v3.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686ego.mod
Gogithub.com/watgbridge/tgsconverterv0.0.0-20240710075117-d1c05581b842go.mod
Gogithub.com/watgbridge/webpv0.0.0-20240709143015-99fb5316f772go.mod
Gogo.mau.fi/whatsmeowv0.0.0-20260713112832-d8960d9575d2go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260709172345-9ea1abe57597go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/mysqlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/postgresv1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
All dependencies 52

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/emersion/go-vcardv0.0.0-20260618161152-d854b7e0e2d3direct
Gogithub.com/forpelevin/gomojiv1.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-co-op/gocronv1.37.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/lithammer/fuzzysearchv1.1.8direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.48direct
Gogithub.com/mdp/qrterminal/v3v3.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/paulsonoflars/gotgbot/v2v2.0.0-rc.35direct
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686edirect
Gogithub.com/watgbridge/tgsconverterv0.0.0-20240710075117-d1c05581b842direct
Gogithub.com/watgbridge/webpv0.0.0-20240709143015-99fb5316f772direct
Gogo.mau.fi/whatsmeowv0.0.0-20260713112832-d8960d9575d2direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260709172345-9ea1abe57597direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogorm.io/driver/mysqlv1.6.0direct
Gogorm.io/driver/postgresv1.6.0direct
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0direct
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2direct
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/av-elier/go-decimal-to-rationalv0.0.0-20250603203441-f39a07f43ff3indirect
Gogithub.com/beeper/argo-gov1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/benau/go_rlottiev0.0.0-20210807002906-98c1b2421989indirect
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.15indirect
Gogithub.com/elliotchance/orderedmap/v3v3.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/inflectionv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/nowv1.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/kettek/apngv0.0.0-20250827064933-2bb5f5fcf253indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/petermattis/goidv0.0.0-20260713124913-97594f28f5caindirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2v2.5.36indirect
Gogo.mau.fi/libsignalv0.2.2indirect
Gogo.mau.fi/utilv0.9.10indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gorsc.io/qrv0.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 52 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown40.56.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.