Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 19:32 UTC

al8n / agnostic

Agnostic is a Rust ecosystem that provides runtime-agnostic abstractions for async operations. Write your async code once and run it seamlessly with tokio, smol, or even in WebAssembly - without code changes.

RustApache-2.0★ 27 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

al8n/agnostic holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on Vitality (27/100). It was last updated 42 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Al LiuPersonal account
261 followers179 public repossince Aug 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iofeature-extension-for-smol0.2.311,8545291 days ago
crates.iofeature-extension-for-wasm-bindgen-futures0.2.311,8575291 days ago
crates.ioagnostic0.11.05,3997442 days agoagnosticasyncruntimesanssansioasynchronous
crates.ioagnostic-io0.2.05,5904291 days agoagnosticasyncruntimesanssansio
crates.ioagnostic-dns0.6.05,260842 days agoagnosticdnsasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioagnostic-net0.4.05,759842 days agoagnosticasyncruntimesanssansioasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioagnostic-lite0.7.011,9493742 days agoagnosticasyncruntimesanssansioasynchronousno-std
crates.ioagnostic-process0.3.05,0905291 days agoagnosticasyncruntimesanssansioasynchronous

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

27At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 42 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume18 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push42
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23/60Stars27 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars27
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64/80Monthly downloads62,758 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfeature-extension-for-smol, feature-extension-for-wasm-bindgen-futures, agnostic, agnostic-io, agnostic-dns, agnostic-net, agnostic-lite, agnostic-process
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads590,703
monthly_downloads62,758
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.989
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution75% of issues closed
18.8/30PR acceptance27/43 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs27
open_issues3
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.4/25Owner reach261 followers of al8n
25/25Track record179 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers261
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginal8n
public_repos179
account_age_days2,931
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 42 days ago
20/20Version history74 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfeature-extension-for-smol, feature-extension-for-wasm-bindgen-futures, agnostic, agnostic-io, agnostic-dns, agnostic-net, agnostic-lite, agnostic-process
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish42

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configrustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/agnostic
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasync, runtime-agnostic, rust, sans, sans-io
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/agnostic
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.7/40Legible commit history20 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.22
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, agnostic-dns/Cargo.toml, agnostic-io/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configrustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, agnostic-dns/Cargo.toml, agnostic-io/Cargo.toml, agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml, agnostic-net/Cargo.toml, agnostic-process/Cargo.toml, agnostic/Cargo.toml, smol/Cargo.toml, wasm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/79 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes27,180
source_files_sampled79
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

27GitHub stars
3contributors
18commits, last 12 months
42days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
3open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612025-012025-102026-06

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 19:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained10 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 52
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioasync-trait0.1agnostic-dns/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-netagnostic-dns/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilagnostic-dns/Cargo.toml
crates.iohickory-resolver0.26agnostic-dns/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1agnostic-dns/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilagnostic-io/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioagnostic-io/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-utilagnostic-io/Cargo.toml
crates.ioatomic-timeagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-liteagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project1agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-ioagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmolagnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembassy-executor0.10agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembassy-time0.5agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembassy-futures0.1agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembassy-sync0.8agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channel0.3agnostic-lite/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-liteagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-ioagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iotriomphe0.1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-stream0.1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-ioagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-liteagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmolagnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1agnostic-net/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-ioagnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilagnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1agnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-process2agnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioagnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmolagnostic-process/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-liteagnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-dnsagnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-netagnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-processagnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioagnostic-ioagnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquinn0.11agnostic/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmol2smol/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-iosmol/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channelsmol/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-utilsmol/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-timer3wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futures0.4wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channelwasm/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioasync-processdirect
crates.ioasync-traitdirect
crates.ioembassy-executordirect
crates.ioembassy-futuresdirect
crates.ioembassy-syncdirect
crates.ioembassy-timedirect
crates.iofutures-channeldirect
crates.iofutures-timerdirect
crates.iohickory-resolverdirect
crates.iopastedirect
crates.iopin-projectdirect
crates.ioquinndirect
crates.iosmoldirect
crates.iotokiodirect
crates.iotokio-streamdirect
crates.iotracingdirect
crates.iotriomphedirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futuresdirect
crates.ioasync-channelindirect
crates.iocritical-sectionindirect
crates.iofuturesindirect
crates.iorustixindirect
crates.iosocket2indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-testindirect
crates.iowindows-sysindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.