Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 13:33 UTC

algolia / docsearch

:blue_book: The easiest way to add search to your documentation.

TypeScript · MDXMIT★ 4,371 stars⑂ 438 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

algolia/docsearch holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AlgoliaOrganization · verified domain
853 followers544 public repossince Jul 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@docsearch/js5.0.44,007,379882 days ago—
npm@docsearch/cli0.0.244248 days agoalgoliaclidocumentationdocsearchmcp
npm@docsearch/css5.0.410,124,448882 days ago—
npm@docsearch/core5.0.44,232,630252 days ago—
npm@docsearch/modal5.0.42,847252 days ago—
npm@docsearch/react5.0.49,486,257962 days ago—
npm@docsearch/sidepanel5.0.42,472242 days ago—
npm@docsearch/sidepanel-js5.0.4472,516242 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 153 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year153
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag@docsearch/sidepanel@5.0.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

92Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
59.1/60Stars — 4,371 stars
22/25Forks — 438 forks
10.9/15Watchers — 94 watchers
Inputs used
forks438
stars4,371
watchers94
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 28,328,593 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@docsearch/js, @docsearch/cli, @docsearch/css, @docsearch/core, @docsearch/modal, @docsearch/react, @docsearch/sidepanel, @docsearch/sidepanel-js
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads28,328,593
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

90Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.198
How it's scored
36.5/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance — 1,877/2,533 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs1,877
open_issues57
closed_issues376
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d29
prs_decided_30d34
issue_closed_ratio0.868
closed_unmerged_prs656
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21.1/25Owner reach — 853 followers of algolia
25/25Track record — 544 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers853
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginalgolia
public_repos544
account_age_days5,146

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 96 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@docsearch/js, @docsearch/cli, @docsearch/css, @docsearch/core, @docsearch/modal, @docsearch/react, @docsearch/sidepanel, @docsearch/sidepanel-js
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docsearch.algolia.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsalgolia, search, docsearch, documentation, javascript, react, typescript
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docsearch.algolia.com
docs_sitehttps://docsearch.algolia.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 38 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: postcss 8.5.6 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 124 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages41
unassessed_packages51
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 41 resolved dependencies against OSV. 51 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/use-algolia-docsearch.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/use-algolia-docsearch.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,810
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/tsconfig.json, examples/demo-js/tsconfig.json, examples/demo-react/tsconfig.json, packages/docsearch-cli/tsconfig.json, packages/website/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsadapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/tsconfig.json, examples/demo-js/tsconfig.json, examples/demo-react/tsconfig.json, packages/docsearch-cli/tsconfig.json, packages/website/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/340 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes26,067
source_files_sampled340
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4,371GitHub stars
98contributors
153commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
57open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 438 ⇿
0Stars
438Forks
68Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050043182015-122021-042026-08
Major 1Minor 14Patch 24

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 13:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities38 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 60
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.19.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docsearch/coreworkspace:*adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docsearch/modalworkspace:*adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docsearch/reactworkspace:*adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docsearch/sidepanelworkspace:*adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docusaurus/core^3.10.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs^3.10.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-common^3.10.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-translations^3.10.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmalgoliasearch^5.37.0adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmalgoliasearch-helper^3.26.0adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmclsx^2.0.0adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmeta^2.2.0adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmfs-extra^11.1.1adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmjoi^17.9.2adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmsearch-insights^2.17.3adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npmtslib^2.6.0adapters/docusaurus-theme-search-algolia/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0packages/docsearch-cli/package.json
npmjsonc-parser^3.3.1packages/docsearch-cli/package.json
npmpicocolors^1.1.1packages/docsearch-cli/package.json
npm@docsearch/core5.0.4packages/docsearch-modal/package.json
npm@docsearch/react5.0.4packages/docsearch-modal/package.json
npm@ai-sdk/react^2.0.30packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.19.2packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npm@base-ui/react^1.5.0packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npm@docsearch/core5.0.4packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npm@docsearch/css5.0.4packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npmai^5.0.30packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npmalgoliasearch^5.28.0packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npmmarked^16.3.0packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npmzod^4.1.8packages/docsearch-react/package.json
npm@docsearch/core5.0.4packages/docsearch-sidepanel/package.json
npm@docsearch/css5.0.4packages/docsearch-sidepanel/package.json
npm@docsearch/react5.0.4packages/docsearch-sidepanel/package.json
npm@docsearch/coreworkspace:*packages/website/package.json
npm@docsearch/cssworkspace:*packages/website/package.json
npm@docsearch/docusaurus-adapterworkspace:*packages/website/package.json
npm@docsearch/modalworkspace:*packages/website/package.json
npm@docsearch/reactworkspace:*packages/website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/core3.10.2packages/website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic3.10.2packages/website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-common3.10.2packages/website/package.json
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.0packages/website/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1packages/website/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1packages/website/package.json
npmcobe^0.6.4packages/website/package.json
npmfile-loader6.2.0packages/website/package.json
npmiconoir-react^7.11.1packages/website/package.json
npmmini-svg-data-uri^1.4.4packages/website/package.json
npmmotion^12.23.3packages/website/package.json
npmpostcss8.5.6packages/website/package.json
npmpostcss-import16.1.1packages/website/package.json
npmpostcss-preset-env10.2.4packages/website/package.json
npmprism-react-renderer2.4.1packages/website/package.json
npmradix-ui^1.4.2packages/website/package.json
npmreact^18.0.0packages/website/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.0.0packages/website/package.json
npmreact-google-recaptcha^3.1.0packages/website/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.3.1packages/website/package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.3.5packages/website/package.json
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 48 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@ai-sdk/react^2.0.30direct
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.19.2direct
npm@base-ui/react^1.5.0direct
npm@docsearch/core5.0.4direct
npm@docsearch/css5.0.4direct
npm@docsearch/react5.0.4direct
npm@docusaurus/core3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/core^3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs^3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/theme-common3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/theme-common^3.10.2direct
npm@docusaurus/theme-translations^3.10.2direct
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.0direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0direct
npmai^5.0.30direct
npmalgoliasearch^5.28.0direct
npmalgoliasearch^5.37.0direct
npmalgoliasearch-helper^3.26.0direct
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1direct
npmclsx^2.0.0direct
npmclsx^2.1.1direct
npmcobe^0.6.4direct
npmeta^2.2.0direct
npmfile-loader6.2.0direct
npmfs-extra^11.1.1direct
npmiconoir-react^7.11.1direct
npmjoi^17.9.2direct
npmjsonc-parser^3.3.1direct
npmmarked^16.3.0direct
npmmini-svg-data-uri^1.4.4direct
npmmotion^12.23.3direct
npmpicocolors^1.1.1direct
npmpostcss8.5.6direct
npmpostcss-import16.1.1direct
npmpostcss-preset-env10.2.4direct
npmprism-react-renderer2.4.1direct
npmradix-ui^1.4.2direct
npmreact^18.0.0direct
npmreact^19.0.0direct
npmreact-dom^18.0.0direct
npmreact-dom^19.0.0direct
npmreact-google-recaptcha^3.1.0direct
npmsearch-insights^2.17.3direct
npmtailwind-merge^3.3.1direct
npmtslib^2.6.0direct
npmtw-animate-css^1.3.5direct
npmzod^4.1.8direct
npm@axe-core/playwright^4.12.1indirect
npm@changesets/cli^2.29.7indirect
npm@docusaurus/module-type-aliases3.10.2indirect
npm@docusaurus/theme-classic3.10.2indirect
npm@docusaurus/tsconfig3.10.2indirect
npm@docusaurus/types3.10.2indirect
npm@docusaurus/types^3.10.2indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-plugin-eslint-comments4.4.1indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@playwright/test1.49.1indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin2.13.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss4.1.11indirect
npm@testing-library/dom10.4.0indirect
npm@testing-library/jest-dom6.6.3indirect
npm@testing-library/react16.2.0indirect
npm@types/bun1.3.10indirect
npm@types/fs-extra^11.0.4indirect
npm@types/node^26.1.1indirect
npm@types/react^19.0.0indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.0.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^4.3.4indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.2indirect
npmbundlesize20.0.32indirect
npmglob^13.0.6indirect
npmhtm3.1.1indirect
npmimage-webpack-loader^8.1.0indirect
npmjsdom26.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmnodemon^3.1.9indirect
npmoxfmt^0.59.0indirect
npmoxlint^1.74.0indirect
npmpreact11.0.0-beta.0indirect
npmstylelint17.14.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-sass-guidelines13.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard40.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-no-unsupported-browser-features8.1.1indirect
npmstylelint-order8.1.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.1.11indirect
npmtsdown0.22.7indirect
npmtypescript5.7.3indirect
npmtypescript^5.8.3indirect
npmvite^6.0.7indirect
npmvitest3.0.2indirect
npmwatch1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 41 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 51 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
vitest3.0.2indirectcritical24.1.0
postcss8.5.6directhigh48.5.23

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.