Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-17 17:41 UTC

alibaba / schedulerx-worker-go

schedulerx-worker-go is the Golang SDK of SchedulerX

GoApache-2.0★ 45 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗

alibaba/schedulerx-worker-go holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (69/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated 45 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AlibabaOrganization

21,454 followers544 public repossince Jul 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/alibaba/schedulerx-worker-go	v1.0.13	-	19	52 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

39Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 45 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18	Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	32
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	45
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~95.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	15
latest_release_tag	v1.0.13
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	45
mean_days_between_releases	95.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

41Weak

How it's scored

26.7/60	Stars — 45 stars
9/25	Forks — 13 forks
5/15	Watchers — 9 watchers

Inputs used

forks	13
stars	45
watchers	9
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.521

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good

How it's scored

25.2/42	Issue resolution — 60% of issues closed
28.3/30	PR acceptance — 51/54 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

merged_prs	51
open_issues	2
closed_issues	3
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.6
closed_unmerged_prs	3
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 21,454 followers of alibaba
25/25	Track record — 544 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	21,454
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	alibaba
public_repos	544
account_age_days	5,210

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 52 days ago
20/20	Version history — 19 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/alibaba/schedulerx-worker-go
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.aliyun.com/aliware/schedulerx
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	aliyun, cronjob, golang, scheduler
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.aliyun.com/aliware/schedulerx
docs_site	https://www.aliyun.com/aliware/schedulerx
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5	Code-Review — Found 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	4.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

56Moderate

How it's scored

9.5/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.64.1 (critical 9.1)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.6/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 212 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	40
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	55
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 55 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.97
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/134 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	148,382
source_files_sampled	134
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — internal/proto/ArteryControlFormats.proto, internal/proto/ContainerFormats.proto, internal/proto/SystemMessageFormats.proto, internal/proto/WireFormats.proto, internal/proto/common.proto, internal/proto/server.proto, internal/proto/worker.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	internal/proto/ArteryControlFormats.proto, internal/proto/ContainerFormats.proto, internal/proto/SystemMessageFormats.proto, internal/proto/WireFormats.proto, internal/proto/common.proto, internal/proto/server.proto, internal/proto/worker.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

45GitHub stars

5contributors

32commits, last 12 months

45days since last push

15releases

1bus factor

2open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿

0Stars

13Forks

15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 0Patch 14

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10

4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-17 17:41 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8	Code-Review	Found 13/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	29 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 13

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/asynkron/protoactor-go	`v0.0.0-20230916135836-b14bb1f51af6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3	`v1.14.44`	go.mod
Go	github.com/natefinch/lumberjack	`v2.0.0+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/panjf2000/ants/v2	`v2.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4	`v4.25.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tidwall/gjson	`v1.18.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.16.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.16.0`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.11.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.64.1`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.33.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/asynkron/protoactor-go	`v0.0.0-20230916135836-b14bb1f51af6`	direct
Go	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3	`v1.14.44`	direct
Go	github.com/natefinch/lumberjack	`v2.0.0+incompatible`	direct
Go	github.com/panjf2000/ants/v2	`v2.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4	`v4.25.2`	direct
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/tidwall/gjson	`v1.18.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.16.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.16.0`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.11.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.64.1`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.33.0`	direct
Go	github.com/asynkron/gofun	`v0.0.0-20220329210725-34fed760f4c2`	indirect
Go	github.com/beorn7/perks	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/burntsushi/toml	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ebitengine/purego	`v0.8.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/emirpasic/gods	`v1.18.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-ole/go-ole	`v1.2.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/gogo/protobuf	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`v1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lithammer/shortuuid/v4	`v4.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lufia/plan9stats	`v0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0`	indirect
Go	github.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions	`v1.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/orcaman/concurrent-map	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/power-devops/perfstat	`v0.0.0-20210106213030-5aafc221ea8c`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.16.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_model	`v0.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/common	`v0.42.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.10.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/match	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/pretty	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tklauser/go-sysconf	`v0.3.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/tklauser/numcpus	`v0.6.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/twmb/murmur3	`v1.1.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/workiva/go-datastructures	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi	`v1.2.4`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/prometheus	`v0.39.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`v1.16.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.16.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metric	`v0.39.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20220518171630-0b5c67f07fdf`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.26.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.8.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.16.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20240318140521-94a12d6c2237`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2	`v2.2.1`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 55 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.64.1`	direct	critical	10	`1.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e`
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.16.0`	indirect	high	6	`1.45.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.26.0`	indirect	moderate	21	`1.27.2`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.16.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`0.41.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records