Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 15:55 UTC

aljo242 / web_serve

my personal site

Go · HTML · TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

aljo242/web_serve holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Alex | Cosmos LabsPersonal account
87 followers98 public repossince Mar 2019Cosmos Labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/aljo242/shmeeload.xyzpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.19.0-343 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18Commit volume81 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year81
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases34 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count34
latest_release_tagv1.19.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases0.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 94% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.939
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance67/71 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs67
open_issues0
closed_issues40
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14/25Owner reach87 followers of aljo242
25/25Track record98 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers87
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginaljo242
public_repos98
account_age_days2,691
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://shmeeload.xyz
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgorilla, websockets
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://shmeeload.xyz
docs_sitehttps://shmeeload.xyz
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingweb_res/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsweb_res/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/53 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes23,892
source_files_sampled53
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
3contributors
81commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
34releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/aljo242/shmeeload.xyz' points at a different repository (https://github.com/aljo242/shmeeload.xyz); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch npm package 'web_res' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 15:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests13 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/HugoSmits86/nativewebpv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/caddyserver/certmagicv0.25.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/gen2brain/avifv0.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.60.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/tdewolff/minify/v2v2.24.13go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0go.mod
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 139 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2direct
Gogithub.com/caddyserver/certmagicv0.25.4direct
Gogithub.com/gen2brain/avifv0.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/hugosmits86/nativewebpv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.60.0direct
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1direct
Gogithub.com/tdewolff/minify/v2v2.24.13direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0direct
Gogithub.com/caddyserver/zerosslv0.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/libdns/libdnsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mholt/acmez/v3v3.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.72indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpackv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/tdewolff/parse/v2v2.8.12indirect
Gogithub.com/tetratelabs/wazerov1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zeebo/blake3v0.2.4indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap/expv0.3.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.73.4indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.21.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.4.2indirect
npm@eslint/core0.17.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.5indirect
npm@eslint/js9.39.4indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.7indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.4.1indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.62.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.62.0indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.15indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.39.4indirect
npmeslint-scope8.4.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmglobals15.15.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.2.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.62.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.