Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 15:29 UTC

alloy-rs / core

High-performance, well-tested & documented core libraries for Ethereum, in Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 965 stars⑂ 274 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗

alloy-rs/core holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (72/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AlloyOrganization
880 followers21 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioalloy-core1.7.21,204,464736 days agoabiencodingethereumevmsolidityno-std
crates.ioalloy-dyn-abi1.7.21,475,961776 days agoabiencodingethereumevmsolidityno-std
crates.ioalloy-json-abi1.7.21,731,671776 days agoabiethereumjsonserdeserializationencoding
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro1.7.21,798,350776 days agoabiencodingethereumevmsolidity
crates.ioalloy-sol-types1.7.21,802,812776 days agoabiencodingethereumevmsolidityno-std
crates.ioalloy-primitives1.7.22,253,517796 days agoethereumethersprimitivesrethrevmno-stddata-structures
crates.iosyn-solidity1.7.21,796,901776 days agoastethereumevmsoliditysyndata-structures
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro-input1.7.21,767,459606 days agoabiencodingethereumevmsolidity

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 131 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year131
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 77 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~24.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count77
latest_release_tagv1.7.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases24.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.4/60Stars — 965 stars
20.3/25Forks — 274 forks
7.4/15Watchers — 22 watchers
Inputs used
forks274
stars965
watchers22
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 13,831,135 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesalloy-core, alloy-dyn-abi, alloy-json-abi, alloy-sol-macro, alloy-sol-types, alloy-primitives, syn-solidity, alloy-sol-macro-input
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads172,328,570
monthly_downloads13,831,135
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.59
How it's scored
38.6/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 771/870 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 22/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs771
open_issues24
closed_issues274
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio0.919
closed_unmerged_prs99
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.2/25Owner reach — 880 followers of alloy-rs
16.7/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers880
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginalloy-rs
public_repos21
account_age_days1,272

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 79 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesalloy-core, alloy-dyn-abi, alloy-json-abi, alloy-sol-macro, alloy-sol-types, alloy-primitives, syn-solidity, alloy-sol-macro-input
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/primitives/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-type-parser/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://alloy.rs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsethereum, rust, blockchain, evm, solidity
has_wikino
homepagehttps://alloy.rs
docs_sitehttps://alloy.rs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

83Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 22/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate8.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://alloy.rs/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://alloy.rs/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml, crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/primitives/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-type-parser/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml, crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml, crates/json-abi/Cargo.toml, crates/primitives/Cargo.toml, crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml, crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml, crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml, crates/sol-type-parser/Cargo.toml, crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml, crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml, tests/core-sol/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 3/254 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes63,945
source_files_sampled254
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

965GitHub stars
99contributors
131commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
77releases
1bus factor
24open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 274 ⇿
0Stars
274Forks
77Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

050100150200250300272162023-062025-012026-09
Major 1Minor 14Patch 61

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10
8.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 15:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests24 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 22/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 91
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioalloy-primitives—crates/core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-dyn-abi—crates/core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-json-abi—crates/core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-types—crates/core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-rlp—crates/core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-json-abi—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-types—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-primitives—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-type-parser—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitoa—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.iowinnow—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest—crates/dyn-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-primitives—crates/json-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-type-parser—crates/json-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/json-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/json-abi/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitoa—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioruint—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iokeccak-asm—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha3—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iotiny-keccak—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iofixed-cache—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioborsh—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-rlp—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iorkyv—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iogetrandom—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iok256—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iosecp256k1—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iofoldhash—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iorapidhash—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-hash—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarbitrary—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproptest-derive—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioallocative—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostgres-types—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iodiesel—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iosqlx-core—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.iosqlx-postgres—crates/primitives/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro-input—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn-solidity—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap2crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro-error3—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha3—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-json-abi—crates/sol-macro-expander/Cargo.toml
crates.iodunce1.0.4crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5.0crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.iomacro-string0.2crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn-solidity—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-json-abi—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/sol-macro-input/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro-input—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro-expander—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro-error3—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—crates/sol-macro/Cargo.toml
crates.iowinnow—crates/sol-type-parser/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/sol-type-parser/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-primitives—crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-sol-macro—crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloy-json-abi—crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/sol-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—crates/syn-solidity/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 8

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioderive_more—direct
crates.iodunce—direct
crates.ioheck—direct
crates.ioindexmap—direct
crates.iomacro-string—direct
crates.ioethabi—indirect
crates.iorustversion—indirect
crates.iotrybuild—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.