Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 02:47 UTC

alphagov / carbon-relay-ng

Fast carbon relay+aggregator with admin interfaces for making changes online - production ready. Fork managed by the GOV.UK Pay team.

Go · JavaScriptCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2016archivedforkView on GitHub ↗

alphagov/carbon-relay-ng holds a health index of 14 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (64/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (9/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

14
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

14
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

1,566 followers1,528 public repossince Feb 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/grafana/carbon-relay-ngpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.5.17-3838 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,029 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1,029
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases17 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,873 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~153.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv0.14.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,873
mean_days_between_releases153.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

9Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth53 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled53
top_contributor_share0.626
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
24.2/30PR acceptance29/36 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
23/25Owner reach1,566 followers of alphagov
25/25Track record1,528 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,566
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginalphagov
public_repos1,528
account_age_days5,644
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgovuk-pay
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes4/111 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes714,360
source_files_sampled111
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
53contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,029days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/grafana/carbon-relay-ng' points at a different repository (https://github.com/grafana/carbon-relay-ng); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 02:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.18.1-0.20180119164648-b1067c1d21b5go.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/Dieterbe/artisanalhistogramv0.0.0-20170619072513-f61b7225d304go.mod
Gogithub.com/Dieterbe/go-metricsv0.0.0-20181015090856-87383909479dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/Dieterbe/topicv0.0.0-20141209014555-1850ffda9965go.mod
Gogithub.com/Shopify/saramav1.23.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.130go.mod
Gogithub.com/bmizerany/assertv0.0.0-20120716205630-e17e99893cb6go.mod
Gogithub.com/dgryski/go-linlogv0.0.0-20180207191225-edcf2dfd90ffgo.mod
Gogithub.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfsv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv0.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.5.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/handlersv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/muxv0.0.0-20140624184626-14cafe285133go.mod
Gogithub.com/grafana/configparserv0.0.0-20210707122942-2593eb86a3eego.mod
Gogithub.com/grafana/metrictankv1.0.1-0.20221128152741-61182cf5f40ego.mod
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoffv0.0.0-20160414055204-0496a6c14df0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kisielk/og-rekv0.0.0-20170405223746-ec792bc6e6aago.mod
Gogithub.com/metrics20/go-metrics20v0.0.0-20180821133656-717ed3a27bf9go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/streadway/amqpv0.0.0-20170521212453-dfe15e360485go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/taylorchu/tokiv0.0.0-20141019163204-20e86122596cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/xdg/scramv0.0.0-20180814205039-7eeb5667e42cgo.mod
All dependencies 66

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 41 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go0.18.1-0.20180119164648-b1067c1d21b5direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go1.44.130direct
Gogithub.com/bmizerany/assert0.0.0-20120716205630-e17e99893cb6direct
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/toml0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000direct
Gogithub.com/dgryski/go-linlog0.0.0-20180207191225-edcf2dfd90ffdirect
Gogithub.com/dieterbe/artisanalhistogram0.0.0-20170619072513-f61b7225d304direct
Gogithub.com/dieterbe/go-metrics0.0.0-20181015090856-87383909479ddirect
Gogithub.com/dieterbe/topic0.0.0-20141209014555-1850ffda9965direct
Gogithub.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfs1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/golang/snappy0.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/handlers1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/mux0.0.0-20140624184626-14cafe285133direct
Gogithub.com/grafana/configparser0.0.0-20210707122942-2593eb86a3eedirect
Gogithub.com/grafana/metrictank1.0.1-0.20221128152741-61182cf5f40edirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoff0.0.0-20160414055204-0496a6c14df0direct
Gogithub.com/kisielk/og-rek0.0.0-20170405223746-ec792bc6e6aadirect
Gogithub.com/metrics20/go-metrics200.0.0-20180821133656-717ed3a27bf9direct
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/shopify/sarama1.23.0direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/streadway/amqp0.0.0-20170521212453-dfe15e360485direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.4direct
Gogithub.com/taylorchu/toki0.0.0-20141019163204-20e86122596cdirect
Gogithub.com/xdg/scram0.0.0-20180814205039-7eeb5667e42cdirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000indirect
Gogithub.com/datadog/zstd1.3.6-0.20190409195224-796139022798indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dgryski/go-jump0.0.0-20170409065014-e1f439676b57indirect
Gogithub.com/eapache/go-resiliency1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/eapache/go-xerial-snappy0.0.0-20180814174437-776d5712da21indirect
Gogithub.com/eapache/queue1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/glog0.0.0-20210429001901-424d2337a529indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf0.0.0-20171113180720-1e59b77b52bfindirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go2.0.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/context0.0.0-20141217160251-215affda49adindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuid1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jcmturner/gofork0.0.0-20190328161633-dc7c13fece03indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespath0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/pretty0.0.0-20160325215624-add1dbc86dafindirect
Gogithub.com/kr/text0.0.0-20150905224508-bb797dc4fb83indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml1.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwd0.0.0-20151120024002-92647f2bd94aindirect
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz40.0.0-20190327172049-315a67e90e41indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metrics0.0.0-20181016184325-3113b8401b8aindirect
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconvey1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgp1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg/stringprep1.0.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.1.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.7.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20180118004544-b28fcf2b08a1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.0.0-20181221193216-37e7f081c4d4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.8.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.7.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/api0.0.0-20180122000316-bc96e9251952indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.0.1-0.20170921170648-24e4144ec923indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20171212231943-a8101f21cf98indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.2.1-0.20180119173759-b71aced4a2a1indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/aescts.v11.0.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/dnsutils.v11.0.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/goidentity.v33.0.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/gokrb5.v77.2.3indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/rpc.v11.1.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.