Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 12:35 UTC

amidesfahani / filament-tinyeditor

a TineMce editor for Laravel Filament Forms

PHP · JavaScript · BladeMIT★ 108 stars⑂ 46 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗

amidesfahani/filament-tinyeditor holds a health index of 9 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (21/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

9
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

9
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

AmidPersonal account
13 followers43 public repossince Mar 2020Amid

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistamidesfahani/filament-tinyeditorv5.0.146,6723772 days agotinymcelaravelfilamenttinyeditor

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
9.4/18Commit volume10 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year10
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases37 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~39.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tagv5.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases39.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.9/60Stars108 stars
13.8/25Forks46 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks46
stars108
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.3/80Monthly downloads46,672 downloads/month across packagist
6/20Registry dependents7 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesamidesfahani/filament-tinyeditor
dependents7
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads549,674
monthly_downloads46,672
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 79% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.792
How it's scored
26.8/42Issue resolution64% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance39/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 12/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues29
closed_issues51
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.637
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.2/25Owner reach13 followers of amidesfahani
24/25Track record43 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginamidesfahani
public_repos43
account_age_days2,388
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 72 days ago
20/20Version history37 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesamidesfahani/filament-tinyeditor
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish72

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

23At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 12/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.2
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier4
security_posture_before_jurisdiction22
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories21
affected_packages7
assessed_packages148
unassessed_packages5
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 6
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 148 resolved dependencies against OSV. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.2/40Legible commit history34 of 72 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.472
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 72
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/8 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes24,042
source_files_sampled8
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

108GitHub stars
13contributors
10commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
29open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 46 ⇿
0Stars
46Forks
32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504422023-112025-032026-06
Major 4Minor 2Patch 25

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 12:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 12/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.92.7composer.json
Packagisttinymce/tinymce^8.0composer.json
Packagistfilament/filament^5.0composer.json
All dependencies 153

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfilament/filamentdirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-toolsdirect
Packagisttinymce/tinymcedirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.9indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.1.5indirect
npm@vue/shared3.1.5indirect
npmalpinejs3.13.3indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmarray-buffer-byte-length1.0.0indirect
npmarraybuffer.prototype.slice1.0.2indirect
npmautoprefixer10.4.16indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.5indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrowserslist4.22.2indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.5indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001566indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn6.0.5indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.1indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.4.602indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmes-abstract1.22.3indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.0.2indirect
npmes-to-primitive1.2.1indirect
npmesbuild0.25.9indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmfor-each0.3.3indirect
npmfraction.js4.3.7indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmfunction.prototype.name1.1.6indirect
npmfunctions-have-names1.2.3indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.2.2indirect
npmget-symbol-description1.0.0indirect
npmglobalthis1.0.3indirect
npmgopd1.0.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-bigints1.0.2indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.1indirect
npmhas-proto1.0.1indirect
npmhas-symbols1.0.3indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.0indirect
npmhosted-git-info2.8.9indirect
npminternal-slot1.0.6indirect
npmis-array-buffer3.0.2indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-bigint1.0.4indirect
npmis-boolean-object1.1.2indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-core-module2.13.1indirect
npmis-date-object1.0.5indirect
npmis-negative-zero2.0.2indirect
npmis-number-object1.0.7indirect
npmis-regex1.1.4indirect
npmis-shared-array-buffer1.0.2indirect
npmis-string1.0.7indirect
npmis-symbol1.0.4indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.12indirect
npmis-weakref1.0.2indirect
npmisarray2.0.5indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-parse-better-errors1.0.2indirect
npmload-json-file4.0.0indirect
npmmemorystream0.3.1indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmnice-try1.0.5indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.14indirect
npmnormalize-package-data2.5.0indirect
npmnormalize-range0.1.2indirect
npmnpm-run-all4.1.5indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.1indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.5indirect
npmparse-json4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key2.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-type3.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpidtree0.3.1indirect
npmpify3.0.0indirect
npmpostcss8.4.32indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprettier2.8.8indirect
npmprettier-plugin-blade1.6.16indirect
npmread-pkg3.0.0indirect
npmregexp.prototype.flags1.5.1indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmsafe-array-concat1.0.1indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.0.0indirect
npmsemver5.7.2indirect
npmset-function-length1.1.1indirect
npmset-function-name2.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-regex1.0.0indirect
npmshell-quote1.8.1indirect
npmside-channel1.0.4indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmspdx-correct3.2.0indirect
npmspdx-exceptions2.3.0indirect
npmspdx-expression-parse3.0.1indirect
npmspdx-license-ids3.0.16indirect
npmstring.prototype.padend3.1.5indirect
npmstring.prototype.trim1.2.8indirect
npmstring.prototype.trimend1.0.7indirect
npmstring.prototype.trimstart1.0.7indirect
npmstrip-bom3.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtyped-array-buffer1.0.0indirect
npmtyped-array-byte-length1.0.0indirect
npmtyped-array-byte-offset1.0.0indirect
npmtyped-array-length1.0.4indirect
npmunbox-primitive1.0.2indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.0.13indirect
npmvalidate-npm-package-license3.0.4indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwhich-boxed-primitive1.0.2indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.13indirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 148 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 5 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
shell-quote1.8.1indirectcritical21.9.0
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
browserslist4.22.2indirecthigh24.28.7
cross-spawn6.0.5indirecthigh17.0.5
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
nanoid3.3.7indirecthigh45.1.16
postcss8.4.32indirecthigh48.5.23

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.