Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 19:38 UTC

anchore / scan-action

Anchore container analysis and scan provided as a GitHub Action

JavaScriptMIT★ 286 stars⑂ 95 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗

#vulnerabilities #workflow #actions #github-actions #policy-evaluation #anchore-engine

anchore/scan-action holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (56/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Anchore, Inc.Organization · verified domain

593 followers107 public repossince Dec 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/anchore/scan-action	v7.4.2+incompatible	-	71	16 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
29.1/36	Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 189 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	189
human_commit_share	0.16
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	42

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 70 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~34.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	70
latest_release_tag	v7.4.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	15
mean_days_between_releases	34.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate

How it's scored

39.8/60	Stars — 286 stars
16.4/25	Forks — 95 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	95
stars	286
watchers	11
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

70Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 23% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	37
top_contributor_share	0.232

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good

How it's scored

34.4/42	Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
22.9/30	PR acceptance — 478/627 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	478
open_issues	23
closed_issues	105
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.82
closed_unmerged_prs	149
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

95Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
19.9/25	Owner reach — 593 followers of anchore
25/25	Track record — 107 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	593
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	anchore
public_repos	107
account_age_days	3,932

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 16 days ago
20/20	Version history — 71 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/anchore/scan-action
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	16

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	vulnerabilities, workflow, actions, github-actions, policy-evaluation, anchore-engine
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

82Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

77Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	17
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	192
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 3, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 192 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 84 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	.make/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.84

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/13 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	15,714
source_files_sampled	13
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

286GitHub stars

37contributors

189commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

70releases

3bus factor

23open issues

Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'anchore-scan-action' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 95 ⇿

0Stars

95Forks

68Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 6Minor 19Patch 43

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10

7.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 19:37 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
4	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	33 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/anchore/go-make	`v0.8.0`	.make/go.mod
npm	@actions/cache	`^6.0.0`	package.json
npm	@actions/core	`^3.0.1`	package.json
npm	@actions/exec	`^3.0.0`	package.json
npm	@actions/tool-cache	`^4.0.0`	package.json
npm	lodash	`^4.18.1`	package.json

All dependencies 192

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 186 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/anchore/go-make	`v0.8.0`	direct
npm	@actions/cache	`6.0.0`	direct
npm	@actions/core	`3.0.1`	direct
npm	@actions/exec	`3.0.0`	direct
npm	@actions/tool-cache	`4.0.0`	direct
npm	lodash	`4.18.1`	direct
Go	github.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4	`v4.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-yaml	`v1.19.2`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.37.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.46.0`	indirect
npm	@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	@actions/glob	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	@actions/http-client	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@actions/io	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/abort-controller	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-auth	`1.10.1`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-client	`1.10.1`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-http-compat	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-lro	`2.7.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-paging	`1.6.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-rest-pipeline	`1.22.2`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-tracing	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-util	`1.13.1`	indirect
npm	@azure/core-xml	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	@azure/logger	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@azure/storage-blob	`12.31.0`	indirect
npm	@azure/storage-common	`12.3.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.8.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/fs-minipass	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@nodable/entities	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	@protobuf-ts/runtime	`2.11.1`	indirect
npm	@protobuf-ts/runtime-rpc	`2.11.1`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@typespec/ts-http-runtime	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	astral-regex	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	better-npm-audit	`3.11.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chownr	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	dayjs	`1.11.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.9.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	events	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.7`	indirect
npm	fast-xml-builder	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	fast-xml-parser	`5.7.3`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.12.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	husky	`9.1.7`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lint-staged	`17.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.get	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.truncate	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	minizlib	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-expression-matcher	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.9.6`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.6.3`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	string-argv	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	strnum	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	table	`6.8.1`	indirect
npm	tar	`7.5.22`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	tunnel	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	undici	`6.24.1`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	xml-naming	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 192 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
undici	`6.24.1`	indirect	high	7	`8.9.0`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.37.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records