Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 05:35 UTC

andrestobelem / pandi-extensions

PI Coding Dynamic Workflows

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

andrestobelem/pandi-extensions holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Security (27/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andrés TobelemPersonal account
4 followers38 public repossince May 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,594 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,594
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases2 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 11 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv0.3.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release11
mean_days_between_releases3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55/80Monthly downloads13,406 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@pandi-coding-agent/pandi-bg, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-ask, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-btw, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-docs, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-exit, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-goal, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-loop, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-plan
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads13,406
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
20/30PR acceptance2/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues85
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
5/25Owner reach4 followers of andrestobelem
23.6/25Track record38 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginandrestobelem
public_repos38
account_age_days4,822
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history12 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@pandi-coding-agent/pandi-bg, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-ask, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-btw, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-docs, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-exit, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-goal, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-loop, @pandi-coding-agent/pandi-plan
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude/skills/dynamic-workflows/reference/primitives/agent.md, .claude/skills/dynamic-workflows/reference/primitives/agents.md, .claude/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, .claude/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md, .pi/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, .pi/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/primitives/agent.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/primitives/agents.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.claude/skills/dynamic-workflows/reference/primitives/agent.md, .claude/skills/dynamic-workflows/reference/primitives/agents.md, .claude/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, .claude/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md, .pi/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, .pi/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/primitives/agent.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/primitives/agents.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agent.md, extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/skills/ultracode/reference/primitives/agents.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,802
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/931 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes643,779
source_files_sampled931
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
1,594commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@pandi-coding-agent/pandi-bg@0.1.9; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 2 ★ / 0 ⇿
2Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-072026-072026-07
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 05:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmpi-codex-web-search0.1.9package.json
npmpi-cursor-sdk0.1.57package.json
npmpi-mcp-adapter2.11.0package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1extensions/pandi-docs/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.5extensions/pandi-docs/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.5extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/package.json
npmsanitize-html^2.17.5extensions/pandi-dynamic-workflows/package.json
npm@pandi-coding-agent/pandi-docs0.1.10extensions/pandi-plan/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.