Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 02:32 UTC

annetutil / gnetcli

The ultimate solution for CLI automation in Golang

GoMIT★ 73 stars⑂ 31 forkssince Oct 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

annetutil/gnetcli holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (10/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

annetutilOrganization
33 followers6 public repossince Oct 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/annetutil/gnetcliv1.3.14-1504 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 120 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year120
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.3.14
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.1/60Stars — 73 stars
12.3/25Forks — 31 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks31
stars73
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.676
How it's scored
7.6/42Issue resolution — 18% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 320/331 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs320
open_issues9
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d16
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio0.182
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11/25Owner reach — 33 followers of annetutil
11.9/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginannetutil
public_repos6
account_age_days1,057

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 150 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/annetutil/gnetcli
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://annetutil.github.io/gnetcli/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgo, golang
has_wikino
homepagehttps://annetutil.github.io/gnetcli/
docs_sitehttps://annetutil.github.io/gnetcli/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

10Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum
manifestsbenchmarks/go.mod, go.mod
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier1
security_posture_before_jurisdiction1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.
How it's scored
7.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.58.2 (critical 9.1), google.golang.org/protobuf v1.31.0 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/crypto v0.52.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
28.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,052 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories26
affected_packages6
assessed_packages42
unassessed_packages6
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1, moderate 2, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 42 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

91Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,708
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, grpc_sdk/python/Makefile, proto_builder/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, grpc_sdk/python/Makefile, proto_builder/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsbenchmarks/go.mod, examples/netsshsetup/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/145 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes159,622
source_files_sampled145
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — pkg/server/proto/google/api/annotations.proto, pkg/server/proto/google/api/http.proto, pkg/server/proto/google/protobuf/empty.proto, pkg/server/proto/server.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespkg/server/proto/google/api/annotations.proto, pkg/server/proto/google/api/http.proto, pkg/server/proto/google/protobuf/empty.proto, pkg/server/proto/server.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

73GitHub stars
27contributors
120commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
9open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 31 ⇿
0Stars
31Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383122023-112025-042026-09
Major 0Minor 3Patch 97

Each point covers 3 days.

Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middlewarev1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/heetch/confitav0.0.0-20181011080120-653cbec9ecffgo.mod
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.4go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.26.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230725093048-515e97ebf090go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20231002182017-d307bd883b97go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20231002182017-d307bd883b97go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.58.2go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.31.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middlewarev1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.15.0direct
Gogithub.com/heetch/confitav0.0.0-20181011080120-653cbec9ecffdirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.8.1direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.6direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.4direct
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.26.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230725093048-515e97ebf090direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.4.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20231002182017-d307bd883b97direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20231002182017-d307bd883b97direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.58.2direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.31.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/annetutil/gnetcliv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/annetutil/gnetcliv1.0.38indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.21indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/fsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/scrapli/scrapligov1.2.1-0.20231123130842-0c1a2e3ac0d4indirect
Gogithub.com/sirikothe/gotextfsmv1.0.1-0.20200816110946-6aa2cfd355e4indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20231002182017-d307bd883b97indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.2.8indirect
PyPIcryptography—indirect
PyPIflake87.0.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos—indirect
PyPIgrpcio—indirect
PyPIprotobuf—indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPItox—indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 42 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.58.2directcritical91.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
google.golang.org/protobufv1.31.0directhigh21.33.0
golang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirectmoderate81.27.0-rc.3
pytest8.4.1indirectmoderate29.0.3
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0directunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.