Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 11:31 UTC

anyproto / anytype-ts

Official Anytype client for MacOS, Linux, and Windows

TypeScriptCustom license★ 8,836 stars⑂ 580 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryWeb interfaceDesktop applicationhow this is determined

#e2ee #local-first #offline-first #p2p #privacy #anytype

anyproto/anytype-ts holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Any AssociationOrganization

6,294 followers91 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	anytypepoints to another repo — not scored	1.1.0	29	12	2625 days ago	xml validation xsd

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36	Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 5,846 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	5,846
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	51

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~5.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.56.10-beta
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	5.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

89Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

92Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 8,836 stars
23/25	Forks — 580 forks
8.8/15	Watchers — 40 watchers

Inputs used

forks	580
stars	8,836
watchers	40
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

86Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 81 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	81
top_contributor_share	0.86

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate

How it's scored

24.9/42	Issue resolution — 59% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 1,540/1,719 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,540
open_issues	198
closed_issues	290
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	5
prs_merged_30d	21
prs_decided_30d	22
issue_closed_ratio	0.594
closed_unmerged_prs	179
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 6,294 followers of anyproto
20/25	Track record — 91 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	6,294
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	anyproto
public_repos	91
account_age_days	1,282

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json, eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://anytype.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	e2ee, local-first, offline-first, p2p, privacy, anytype
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://anytype.io
docs_site	https://anytype.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

20At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 top contributor profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 92 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	50
security_posture_after_multiplier	20
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	40

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	14
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:anytype@1.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://doc.anytype.io/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 89 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://doc.anytype.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.89
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	21,136

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json, eslint.config.js
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 10/2,062 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	357,731
source_files_sampled	2,062
oversized_source_files	10

Key facts

8,836GitHub stars

81contributors

5,846commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

198open issues

Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'anytype' points at a different repository (https://github.com/sergeiterehov/anytype); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 580 ⇿

0Stars

580Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 10Patch 39

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 11:31 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	92 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 82

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@bufbuild/protobuf	`^2.11.0`	package.json
npm	@dnd-kit/core	`^6.3.1`	package.json
npm	@dnd-kit/modifiers	`^9.0.0`	package.json
npm	@dnd-kit/sortable	`^10.0.0`	package.json
npm	@dnd-kit/utilities	`^3.2.2`	package.json
npm	@electron/remote	`^2.1.3`	package.json
npm	@excalidraw/excalidraw	`^0.17.6`	package.json
npm	@lexical/link	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/list	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/markdown	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/react	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/rich-text	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/selection	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/utils	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	@mermaid-js/layout-elk	`^0.2.0`	package.json
npm	@number-flow/react	`^0.5.11`	package.json
npm	@sentry/browser	`^7.39.0`	package.json
npm	@sentry/cli	`^2.18.1`	package.json
npm	@sindresorhus/slugify	`^3.0.0`	package.json
npm	@types/d3	`^7.4.3`	package.json
npm	@viz-js/viz	`^3.2.4`	package.json
npm	amplitude-js	`^8.21.9`	package.json
npm	blueimp-load-image	`^5.16.0`	package.json
npm	check-disk-space	`^3.4.0`	package.json
npm	d3	`^7.9.0`	package.json
npm	d3-force	`^3.0.0`	package.json
npm	d3-force-cluster	`^0.1.2`	package.json
npm	date-fns	`^4.1.0`	package.json
npm	diff	`^5.2.0`	package.json
npm	dompurify	`^3.3.0`	package.json
npm	electron-dl	`^3.5.2`	package.json
npm	electron-json-storage	`^4.6.0`	package.json
npm	electron-log	`^5.4.3`	package.json
npm	electron-updater	`^6.8.3`	package.json
npm	electron-util	`^0.12.3`	package.json
npm	electron-window-state	`^5.0.3`	package.json
npm	elkjs	`^0.11.0`	package.json
npm	file-type	`^21.3.0`	package.json
npm	findandreplacedomtext	`^0.4.6`	package.json
npm	google-protobuf	`^3.21.4`	package.json
npm	grpc-web	`^1.5.0`	package.json
npm	history	`^4.10.1`	package.json
npm	inputmask	`^5.0.5`	package.json
npm	katex	`^0.16.22`	package.json
npm	keytar	`7.9.0`	package.json
npm	lazy-val	`^1.0.4`	package.json
npm	lexical	`^0.40.0`	package.json
npm	libphonenumber-js	`^1.12.31`	package.json
npm	linux-distro	`^4.0.1`	package.json
npm	lodash	`^4.17.20`	package.json
npm	lodash.isequal	`^4.5.0`	package.json
npm	mermaid	`^11.15.0`	package.json
npm	mime-types	`^3.0.1`	package.json
npm	mobx	`^6.15.0`	package.json
npm	mobx-logger	`^0.7.1`	package.json
npm	mobx-react-lite	`^4.1.0`	package.json
npm	motion	`^12.23.24`	package.json
npm	node-gyp	`^12.1.0`	package.json
npm	p-finally	`^2.0.1`	package.json
npm	pako	`^2.1.0`	package.json
npm	pdfjs-dist	`^5.4.296`	package.json
npm	pixi.js	`^8.16.0`	package.json
npm	prismjs	`^1.21.0`	package.json
npm	qrcode.react	`^4.1.0`	package.json
npm	raf	`^3.4.1`	package.json
npm	react	`^18.3.1`	package.json
npm	react-canvas-confetti	`^2.0.7`	package.json
npm	react-dom	`^18.3.1`	package.json
npm	react-minimal-pie-chart	`^9.1.2`	package.json
npm	react-pdf	`^10.2.0`	package.json
npm	react-router-dom	`^5.3.4`	package.json
npm	react-virtualized	`^9.22.5`	package.json
npm	read-chunk	`^5.0.0`	package.json
npm	regedit	`^5.1.3`	package.json
npm	sanitize-filename	`^1.6.3`	package.json
npm	scheduler	`^0.23.2`	package.json
npm	selection-ranges	`^4.0.3`	package.json
npm	sha1	`^1.1.1`	package.json
npm	swiper	`^12.0.3`	package.json
npm	usehooks-ts	`^3.1.1`	package.json
npm	util	`^0.12.5`	package.json
npm	with-open-file	`^0.1.7`	package.json

All dependencies 120

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 82 direct and 38 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@bufbuild/protobuf	`^2.11.0`	direct
npm	@dnd-kit/core	`^6.3.1`	direct
npm	@dnd-kit/modifiers	`^9.0.0`	direct
npm	@dnd-kit/sortable	`^10.0.0`	direct
npm	@dnd-kit/utilities	`^3.2.2`	direct
npm	@electron/remote	`^2.1.3`	direct
npm	@excalidraw/excalidraw	`^0.17.6`	direct
npm	@lexical/link	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/list	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/markdown	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/react	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/rich-text	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/selection	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/utils	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	@mermaid-js/layout-elk	`^0.2.0`	direct
npm	@number-flow/react	`^0.5.11`	direct
npm	@sentry/browser	`^7.39.0`	direct
npm	@sentry/cli	`^2.18.1`	direct
npm	@sindresorhus/slugify	`^3.0.0`	direct
npm	@types/d3	`^7.4.3`	direct
npm	@viz-js/viz	`^3.2.4`	direct
npm	amplitude-js	`^8.21.9`	direct
npm	blueimp-load-image	`^5.16.0`	direct
npm	check-disk-space	`^3.4.0`	direct
npm	d3	`^7.9.0`	direct
npm	d3-force	`^3.0.0`	direct
npm	d3-force-cluster	`^0.1.2`	direct
npm	date-fns	`^4.1.0`	direct
npm	diff	`^5.2.0`	direct
npm	dompurify	`^3.3.0`	direct
npm	electron-dl	`^3.5.2`	direct
npm	electron-json-storage	`^4.6.0`	direct
npm	electron-log	`^5.4.3`	direct
npm	electron-updater	`^6.8.3`	direct
npm	electron-util	`^0.12.3`	direct
npm	electron-window-state	`^5.0.3`	direct
npm	elkjs	`^0.11.0`	direct
npm	file-type	`^21.3.0`	direct
npm	findandreplacedomtext	`^0.4.6`	direct
npm	google-protobuf	`^3.21.4`	direct
npm	grpc-web	`^1.5.0`	direct
npm	history	`^4.10.1`	direct
npm	inputmask	`^5.0.5`	direct
npm	katex	`^0.16.22`	direct
npm	keytar	`7.9.0`	direct
npm	lazy-val	`^1.0.4`	direct
npm	lexical	`^0.40.0`	direct
npm	libphonenumber-js	`^1.12.31`	direct
npm	linux-distro	`^4.0.1`	direct
npm	lodash	`^4.17.20`	direct
npm	lodash.isequal	`^4.5.0`	direct
npm	mermaid	`^11.15.0`	direct
npm	mime-types	`^3.0.1`	direct
npm	mobx	`^6.15.0`	direct
npm	mobx-logger	`^0.7.1`	direct
npm	mobx-react-lite	`^4.1.0`	direct
npm	motion	`^12.23.24`	direct
npm	node-gyp	`^12.1.0`	direct
npm	p-finally	`^2.0.1`	direct
npm	pako	`^2.1.0`	direct
npm	pdfjs-dist	`^5.4.296`	direct
npm	pixi.js	`^8.16.0`	direct
npm	prismjs	`^1.21.0`	direct
npm	qrcode.react	`^4.1.0`	direct
npm	raf	`^3.4.1`	direct
npm	react	`^18.3.1`	direct
npm	react-canvas-confetti	`^2.0.7`	direct
npm	react-dom	`^18.3.1`	direct
npm	react-minimal-pie-chart	`^9.1.2`	direct
npm	react-pdf	`^10.2.0`	direct
npm	react-router-dom	`^5.3.4`	direct
npm	react-virtualized	`^9.22.5`	direct
npm	read-chunk	`^5.0.0`	direct
npm	regedit	`^5.1.3`	direct
npm	sanitize-filename	`^1.6.3`	direct
npm	scheduler	`^0.23.2`	direct
npm	selection-ranges	`^4.0.3`	direct
npm	sha1	`^1.1.1`	direct
npm	swiper	`^12.0.3`	direct
npm	usehooks-ts	`^3.1.1`	direct
npm	util	`^0.12.5`	direct
npm	with-open-file	`^0.1.7`	direct
npm	@biomejs/biome	`^2.4.8`	indirect
npm	@electron/notarize	`^3.1.1`	indirect
npm	@storybook/addon-essentials	`^8`	indirect
npm	@storybook/react	`^8`	indirect
npm	@storybook/react-vite	`^8`	indirect
npm	@tomjs/electron-devtools-installer	`^4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@types/history	`^4.7.8`	indirect
npm	@types/katex	`^0.16.7`	indirect
npm	@types/lodash	`^4.14.165`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^24.9.1`	indirect
npm	@types/prismjs	`^1.16.1`	indirect
npm	@types/raf	`^3.4.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^18.3.26`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`^18.3.7`	indirect
npm	@types/react-router-dom	`^5.3.3`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react-swc	`^4.2.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`^7.2.4`	indirect
npm	cross-env	`^10.1.0`	indirect
npm	electron	`^41.10.6`	indirect
npm	electron-builder	`^26.8.1`	indirect
npm	eslint	`^9.26.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-react	`^7.37.5`	indirect
npm	globals	`^16.0.0`	indirect
npm	husky	`^8.0.3`	indirect
npm	license-checker	`^25.0.1`	indirect
npm	lint-staged	`^13.0.3`	indirect
npm	npm-run-all	`^4.1.5`	indirect
npm	patch-package	`^6.4.7`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.77.6`	indirect
npm	storybook	`^8`	indirect
npm	terser	`^5.36.0`	indirect
npm	ts-proto	`^2.11.5`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.3.3`	indirect
npm	typescript-eslint	`^8.54.0`	indirect
npm	unplugin-auto-import	`^21.0.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`^6.3.0`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-static-copy	`^2.3.0`	indirect
npm	vitest	`^4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:anytype@1.1.0 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records