Public recordModerate
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 00:26 UTC
anywhere-labs / Agents-Anywhere
Control any coding agent on any device — from your phone.
anywhere-labs/Agents-Anywhere holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Security (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
54
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
anywhere-labsOrganization
5 followers1 public reposince May 2026
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | anywhere-cli | 0.1.7.1 | - | 8 | 27 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
72
Development activity
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 6.2/36 | Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 591 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 591 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 9 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 4 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 26 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~3.6 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 4 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.1.7 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 26 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 3.6 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
50
Popularity & adoption
71Good
How it's scored
| 45.4/60 | Stars — 626 stars |
| 16.1/25 | Forks — 87 forks |
| 9.5/15 | Watchers — 53 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 87 |
| stars | 626 |
| watchers | 53 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 0/22.5 | License — no license file detected |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | no |
| readme_badges | 14 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
50
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
20At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 4.6/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits |
| 6.8/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 5 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 5 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.797 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed |
| 30/30 | PR acceptance — 17/17 decided PRs merged |
| 13/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 7/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 7.5/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 17 |
| open_issues | 3 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 2 |
| prs_decided_7d | 2 |
| prs_merged_30d | 13 |
| prs_decided_30d | 13 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 0 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 3 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 7 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 7 |
Ownership & stewardship
48Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 5.6/25 | Owner reach — 5 followers of anywhere-labs |
| 2.6/25 | Track record — 1 public repos, account ~0 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 5 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | anywhere-labs |
| public_repos | 1 |
| account_age_days | 73 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 27 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 8 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | anywhere-cli |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 27 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
52
Engineering practices
30At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 10 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | agents, claudecode, codex, llm, opencode, codex-app, remote, remote-control, acp, agentclientprotocol |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
38
Security posture
22At Risk
How it's scored
| 6.8/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 3.8/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0/2.5 | Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 0/2.5 | License — license file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 2.2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 38 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:anywhere-cli@0.1.7.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 38 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
51
Agent context & guidance
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 25.1/40 | Legible commit history — 47 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.47 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
56Moderate
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — android/app/build.gradle.kts, android/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — _deprecated/desktop/tsconfig.json, _deprecated/web/tsconfig.json, desktop-next/tsconfig.json, web-next/_reference/demo-shadcn/tsconfig.json, web-next/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | _deprecated/desktop/tsconfig.json, _deprecated/web/tsconfig.json, desktop-next/tsconfig.json, web-next/_reference/demo-shadcn/tsconfig.json, web-next/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | android/app/build.gradle.kts, android/build.gradle.kts |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed) |
| 54.3/55 | Manageable file sizes — 8/660 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | TypeScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 224,435 |
| source_files_sampled | 660 |
| oversized_source_files | 8 |
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) |
| 0/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | network-service |
Key facts
626GitHub stars
5contributors
591commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch pypi package 'agent-server' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 87 ⇿
0Stars
87Forks
4Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 1Patch 3
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 9 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 0 | Branch-Protection | branch protection not enabled on development/release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 5 | Code-Review | Found 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0 | Contributors | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 0 | License | license file not detected |
| 0 | Maintained | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 87
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | claude-agent-sdk | — | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx | >=0.28.1 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | loguru | >=0.7.3 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pexpect | >=4.9.0 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | ptyprocess | >=0.7.0 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pydantic | >=2.0.0 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyte | >=0.8.2 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-socks | >=2.8.1 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pywinpty | >=2.0.13 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | websockets | >=16.0 | connector/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | aiosqlite | >=0.20.0 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | asyncpg | >=0.30.0 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | claude-agent-sdk | — | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | fastapi | >=0.136.1 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx | >=0.28.1 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx-s3-client | — | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | loguru | >=0.7.3 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-multipart | >=0.0.20 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | sqlalchemy | >=2.0.36 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | uvicorn | >=0.47.0 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | websockets | >=16.0 | server/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | wsproto | >=1.3.2 | server/pyproject.toml |
| npm | @base-ui/react | ^1.6.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/commands | ^6.10.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-cpp | ^6.0.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-css | ^6.3.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-html | ^6.4.11 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-java | ^6.0.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-javascript | ^6.2.5 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-json | ^6.0.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-markdown | ^6.5.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-php | ^6.0.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-python | ^6.2.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-sql | ^6.10.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-xml | ^6.1.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-yaml | ^6.1.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/language | ^6.12.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/legacy-modes | ^6.5.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/search | ^6.7.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/state | ^6.6.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/view | ^6.43.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @lezer/highlight | ^1.2.3 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-avatar | ^1.2.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-checkbox | ^1.3.5 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-dialog | ^1.1.17 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu | ^2.1.18 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-label | ^2.1.10 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-popover | ^1.1.17 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-select | ^2.3.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-separator | ^1.1.10 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-slot | ^1.3.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-switch | ^1.3.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tabs | ^1.1.15 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tooltip | ^1.2.10 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @remixicon/react | ^4.9.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @tailwindcss/postcss | ^4.3.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @xterm/addon-fit | ^0.11.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @xterm/addon-web-links | ^0.12.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | @xterm/xterm | ^6.0.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | class-variance-authority | ^0.7.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | clsx | ^2.1.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | cmdk | ^1.1.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | embla-carousel-react | ^8.6.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | highlight.js | ^11.11.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | input-otp | ^1.4.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | lucide-react | ^1.21.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | monaco-editor | ^0.55.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | next | ^16.2.9 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | next-intl | ^4.13.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | next-themes | ^0.4.6 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | qrcode | ^1.5.4 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | radix-ui | ^1.6.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react | ^19.2.7 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-day-picker | ^10.0.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^19.2.7 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-easy-crop | ^6.0.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-is | ^19.2.7 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-markdown | ^10.1.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | react-resizable-panels | ^4.11.2 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | recharts | ^3.8.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | remark-gfm | ^4.0.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | shadcn | ^4.11.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | sonner | ^2.0.7 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | tailwind-merge | ^3.6.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | tailwindcss | ^4.3.1 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | tw-animate-css | ^1.4.0 | web-next/package.json |
| npm | vaul | ^1.1.2 | web-next/package.json |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Dependency advisories 0
Installing pypi:anywhere-cli@0.1.7.1 pulls in 38 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.