Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-30 21:32 UTC

anza-xyz / cryptography

RustNo license detected★ 2 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

anza-xyz/cryptography holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

anza-xyzOrganization
917 followers60 public repossince Aug 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iosolana-ed255190.2.21,472520 days agocryptocryptographycurve25519ristrettoristretto255no-std
crates.iosolana-bls12-381-syscall0.1.1102,26631 day ago
crates.iosolana-curve25519-cudapoints to another repo — not scored0.0.02191 days ago
crates.ioed25519-pokospoints to another repo — not scored0.0.03191 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 64 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year64
human_commit_share0.797
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagsolana-bls12-381-syscall@v0.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases16.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
66.9/80Monthly downloads — 103,738 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessolana-ed25519, solana-bls12-381-syscall
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads311,219
monthly_downloads103,738
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 67% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.667
How it's scored
28/42Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
22/30PR acceptance — 63/86 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs63
open_issues1
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.667
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.3/25Owner reach — 917 followers of anza-xyz
18.9/25Track record — 60 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers917
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginanza-xyz
public_repos60
account_age_days1,076

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessolana-ed25519, solana-bls12-381-syscall
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 49 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.961
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — curve25519/solana-ed25519/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 64
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 64 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filescurve25519/solana-ed25519/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, curve25519/curve25519-cuda/Cargo.toml, curve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml, experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml, secp256r1/Cargo.toml, syscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml, syscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.203
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/116 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes257,740
source_files_sampled116
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

2GitHub stars
4contributors
64commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'solana-secp256r1' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'solana-bn254-syscall' from its registry
  • crates package 'solana-curve25519-cuda' points at a different repository (https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'ed25519-pokos' points at a different repository (https://github.com/anza-xyz/agave); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512026-032026-042026-06
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 21:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 43
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iosolana-ed25519curve25519/curve25519-cuda/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayoncurve25519/curve25519-cuda/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-ifcurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519curve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.ioffcurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iogroupcurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_corecurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10.2curve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iodigestcurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrowncurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iodercurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iopkcs8curve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2curve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubtlecurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdecurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroizecurve25519/solana-ed25519/Cargo.toml
crates.iobincodeexperimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iosolana-ed25519experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-air0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-challenger0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-commit0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-dft0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-field0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-fri0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-keccak0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-koala-bear0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-matrix0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-merkle-tree0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-symmetric0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iop3-uni-stark0.6.1experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.9experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2experimental/ed25519-pokos/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblstsyscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblstrssyscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemucksyscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck_derivesyscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.iopairingsyscall/bls12-381-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-bn254syscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-ecsyscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-ffsyscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.ioark-serializesyscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemucksyscall/bn254-syscall/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.