Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 15:33 UTC

arcforgelabs / dictate

Local-only desktop dictation for Linux and Windows: hold a key, speak, and the text lands in the focused app. On-device Parakeet speech-to-text on the CPU, no accounts, no cloud.

Python · JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationCommand-line toolLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

arcforgelabs/dictate holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Arc ForgeOrganization
1 follower11 public repossince May 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@arcforgelabs/dictate2026.10.21,6106414 days ago
PyPIdictate0.2.02433476 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 700 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year700
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year22
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv2026.10.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
42.8/80Monthly downloads — 1,610 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@arcforgelabs/dictate
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,610
unverified_packages_excludeddictate
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.996
How it's scored
20.5/42Issue resolution — 49% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 105/126 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues20
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d53
prs_decided_30d58
issue_closed_ratio0.487
closed_unmerged_prs21
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of arcforgelabs
8.7/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginarcforgelabs
public_repos11
account_age_days162

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@arcforgelabs/dictate, dictate
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 16 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://arcforge.au/download/dictate
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdesktop-app, dictation, linux, push-to-talk, python, speech-to-text, transcription, whisper, windows, local-first, offline, onnxruntime, parakeet
has_wikino
homepagehttps://arcforge.au/download/dictate
docs_sitehttps://arcforge.au/download/dictate
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.3

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages4
assessed_packages221
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severityhigh 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 221 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://arcforge.au/llms.txt)
37.3/40Legible commit history — 70 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://arcforge.au/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.7
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,118
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — ui-shell/src-tauri/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 54 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.54
toolchain_manifestsui-shell/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.6/55Manageable file sizes — 4/152 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes96,617
source_files_sampled152
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
700commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
20open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 15:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsounddevice>=0.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebrtc-noise-gain>=1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnx-asr>=0.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime>=1.30,<1.31pyproject.toml
PyPIhuggingface-hub>=0.36pyproject.toml
npmreact^18.3.1ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.3.1ui/package.json
All dependencies 228

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 219 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmreact18.3.1direct
npmreact-dom18.3.1direct
PyPIhuggingface-hub0.36.2direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPIonnx-asr0.12.0direct
PyPIonnxruntime1.30.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIsounddevice0.5.5direct
PyPIwebrtc-noise-gain1.3.0direct
crates.ioserde—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.iotauri—indirect
crates.iotauri-build—indirect
crates.iotauri-plugin-dialog—indirect
crates.iotauri-plugin-os—indirect
crates.iotauri-plugin-single-instance—indirect
npm@adobe/css-tools4.5.0indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color3.2.0indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers5.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc2.1.4indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser3.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms3.0.5indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer3.0.4indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-darwin-arm642.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-darwin-x642.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-arm-gnueabihf2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-arm64-gnu2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-riscv64-gnu2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-x64-gnu2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-linux-x64-musl2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-win32-arm64-msvc2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-win32-ia32-msvc2.11.3indirect
npm@tauri-apps/cli-win32-x64-msvc2.11.3indirect
npm@testing-library/dom10.4.2indirect
npm@testing-library/jest-dom6.9.1indirect
npm@testing-library/react16.3.2indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/aria-query5.0.4indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles5.2.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcss.escape1.5.1indirect
npmcssstyle4.6.0indirect
npmdata-urls5.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdom-accessibility-api0.5.16indirect
npmdom-accessibility-api0.6.3indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmentities6.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmiconv-lite0.6.3indirect
npmindent-string4.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsdom25.0.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlz-string1.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmin-indent1.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.19indirect
npmnwsapi2.2.23indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmparse57.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmpretty-format27.5.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmreact-is17.0.2indirect
npmredent3.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmrrweb-cssom0.7.1indirect
npmrrweb-cssom0.8.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmscheduler0.23.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstrip-indent3.0.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtldts6.1.86indirect
npmtldts-core6.1.86indirect
npmtough-cookie5.1.2indirect
npmtr465.1.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions7.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-encoding3.1.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype4.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url14.2.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.7.1indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcssselect20.9.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdictate2026.10.2indirect
PyPIevdev1.9.3indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfsspec2024.12.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpynput1.8.2indirect
PyPIpyobjc-core12.2.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-applicationservices12.2.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-cocoa12.2.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-coretext12.2.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-quartz12.2.1indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-xlib0.33indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 221 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
cairosvg2.9.0indirecthigh22.9.1
fsspec2024.12.0indirecthigh22026.6.0
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2
urllib32.7.0indirecthigh62.8.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.