Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 18:01 UTC

ash-project / ash_admin

A super-admin UI dashboard for Ash Framework applications, built with Phoenix LiveView.

JavaScript · ElixirCustom license★ 180 stars⑂ 78 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

ash-project/ash_admin holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (49/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ash FrameworkOrganization

388 followers61 public repossince Dec 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Hex	ash_admin	1.3.2	41,393	121	5 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
21.5/36	Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 102 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	102
human_commit_share	0.83
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	31

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~34.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	14
latest_release_tag	v1.3.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	5
mean_days_between_releases	34.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

55Moderate

How it's scored

36.5/60	Stars — 180 stars
15.7/25	Forks — 78 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	78
stars	180
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

86Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

77Good

How it's scored

61.6/80	Monthly downloads — 41,393 downloads/month across hex
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	ash_admin
dependents	—
ecosystems	hex
total_downloads	490,306
monthly_downloads	41,393
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 59 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	59
top_contributor_share	0.794

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

41.5/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.2/30	PR acceptance — 278/344 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	278
open_issues	1
closed_issues	78
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	5
prs_decided_30d	5
issue_closed_ratio	0.987
closed_unmerged_prs	66
first_time_authors_30d	3
first_time_prs_merged_30d	4
first_time_prs_decided_30d	4

Ownership & stewardship

74Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
18.6/25	Owner reach — 388 followers of ash-project
25/25	Track record — 61 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	388
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	ash-project
public_repos	61
account_age_days	2,471

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20	Version history — 121 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	ash_admin
ecosystems	hex
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://hexdocs.pm/ash_admin
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ash, elixir, admin
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://hexdocs.pm/ash_admin
docs_site	https://hexdocs.pm/ash_admin
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 16 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

67Good

How it's scored

10.5/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: ash_phoenix 2.3.24 (high 8.1), ash 3.32.3 (moderate 6.8)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	16
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	184
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 5, moderate 3, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 184 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 79 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.952
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — mix.exs (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	mix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	mix.exs
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.17

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
53.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/104 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	1,348,695
source_files_sampled	104
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

180GitHub stars

59contributors

102commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

14releases

1bus factor

1open issues

Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 78 ⇿

0Stars

78Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 4Patch 8

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 18:00 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10	Contributors	project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	16 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 18

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@codemirror/lang-json	`^6.0.0`	assets/package.json
npm	@codemirror/lang-markdown	`^6.0.0`	assets/package.json
npm	@codemirror/lint	`^6.0.0`	assets/package.json
npm	@codemirror/theme-one-dark	`^6.1.3`	assets/package.json
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`^0.5.0`	assets/package.json
npm	@tailwindcss/typography	`^0.5.0`	assets/package.json
npm	codemirror	`^6.0.0`	assets/package.json
npm	marked	`^15.0.0`	assets/package.json
npm	tailwindcss	`^3.0.0`	assets/package.json
Hex	cinder	`~> 0.9`	mix.exs
Hex	ash	`~> 3.0 and >= 3.4.63`	mix.exs
Hex	ash_phoenix	`~> 2.0 and >= 2.3.20`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_view	`~> 2.0`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix	`~> 1.7`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_live_view	`~> 1.1-rc`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_html	`~> 4.1`	mix.exs
Hex	jason	`~> 1.0`	mix.exs
Hex	gettext	`~> 0.26 or ~> 1.0`	mix.exs

All dependencies 184

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 166 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Hex	ash	`3.32.3`	direct
Hex	ash_phoenix	`2.3.24`	direct
Hex	cinder	`0.17.0`	direct
Hex	gettext	`1.0.2`	direct
Hex	jason	`1.4.5`	direct
Hex	phoenix	`1.8.13`	direct
Hex	phoenix_html	`4.3.0`	direct
Hex	phoenix_live_view	`1.2.11`	direct
Hex	phoenix_view	`2.0.4`	direct
npm	@codemirror/lang-json	`6.0.2`	direct
npm	@codemirror/lang-markdown	`6.5.0`	direct
npm	@codemirror/lint	`6.9.4`	direct
npm	@codemirror/theme-one-dark	`6.1.3`	direct
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`0.5.10`	direct
npm	@tailwindcss/typography	`0.5.19`	direct
npm	codemirror	`6.0.2`	direct
npm	marked	`15.0.12`	direct
npm	tailwindcss	`3.4.17`	direct
Hex	ash_postgres	`2.12.0`	indirect
Hex	ash_sql	`0.7.1`	indirect
Hex	bunt	`1.0.0`	indirect
Hex	cc_precompiler	`0.1.11`	indirect
Hex	cowboy	`2.18.0`	indirect
Hex	cowboy_telemetry	`0.4.0`	indirect
Hex	cowlib	`2.19.0`	indirect
Hex	credo	`1.7.19`	indirect
Hex	crux	`0.1.4`	indirect
Hex	db_connection	`2.10.2`	indirect
Hex	decimal	`3.1.1`	indirect
Hex	dialyxir	`1.4.7`	indirect
Hex	earmark_parser	`1.4.46`	indirect
Hex	ecto	`3.14.2`	indirect
Hex	ecto_sql	`3.14.0`	indirect
Hex	elixir_make	`0.10.0`	indirect
Hex	erlex	`0.2.9`	indirect
Hex	esbuild	`0.10.0`	indirect
Hex	ets	`0.9.0`	indirect
Hex	ex_ast	`0.13.1`	indirect
Hex	ex_check	`0.16.0`	indirect
Hex	ex_doc	`0.40.3`	indirect
Hex	expo	`1.1.1`	indirect
Hex	file_system	`1.1.1`	indirect
Hex	finch	`0.23.0`	indirect
Hex	fine	`0.1.6`	indirect
Hex	floki	`0.38.4`	indirect
Hex	git_cli	`0.3.0`	indirect
Hex	git_ops	`2.12.2`	indirect
Hex	glob_ex	`0.1.12`	indirect
Hex	hpax	`1.0.4`	indirect
Hex	igniter	`0.8.3`	indirect
Hex	iterex	`0.1.2`	indirect
Hex	lazy_html	`0.1.12`	indirect
Hex	makeup	`1.2.2`	indirect
Hex	makeup_elixir	`1.0.1`	indirect
Hex	makeup_erlang	`1.1.0`	indirect
Hex	mime	`2.0.7`	indirect
Hex	mint	`1.9.3`	indirect
Hex	mix_audit	`2.1.5`	indirect
Hex	multigraph	`0.16.1-mg.4`	indirect
Hex	nimble_options	`1.1.1`	indirect
Hex	nimble_parsec	`1.4.2`	indirect
Hex	nimble_pool	`1.1.0`	indirect
Hex	owl	`0.13.1`	indirect
Hex	phoenix_live_reload	`1.7.0`	indirect
Hex	phoenix_pubsub	`2.3.0`	indirect
Hex	phoenix_template	`1.0.4`	indirect
Hex	plug	`1.20.3`	indirect
Hex	plug_cowboy	`2.9.0`	indirect
Hex	plug_crypto	`2.2.0`	indirect
Hex	postgrex	`0.22.4`	indirect
Hex	ranch	`2.2.1`	indirect
Hex	reactor	`1.0.6`	indirect
Hex	req	`0.7.4`	indirect
Hex	rewrite	`1.3.0`	indirect
Hex	simple_sat	`0.1.4`	indirect
Hex	sobelow	`0.15.0`	indirect
Hex	sourceror	`1.12.2`	indirect
Hex	spark	`2.7.2`	indirect
Hex	spitfire	`0.4.0`	indirect
Hex	splode	`0.3.2`	indirect
Hex	stream_data	`1.4.0`	indirect
Hex	tailwind	`0.5.1`	indirect
Hex	telemetry	`1.4.2`	indirect
Hex	text_diff	`0.1.0`	indirect
Hex	websock	`0.5.3`	indirect
Hex	websock_adapter	`0.6.0`	indirect
Hex	yamerl	`0.10.0`	indirect
Hex	yaml_elixir	`2.12.2`	indirect
Hex	ymlr	`5.1.6`	indirect
npm	@alloc/quick-lru	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/autocomplete	`6.20.0`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/commands	`6.10.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-css	`6.3.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-html	`6.4.11`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-javascript	`6.2.4`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/language	`6.12.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/search	`6.6.0`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/state	`6.5.4`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/view	`6.39.15`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.30`	indirect
npm	@lezer/common	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/css	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/highlight	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	@lezer/html	`1.3.13`	indirect
npm	@lezer/javascript	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	@lezer/json	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@lezer/lr	`1.4.8`	indirect
npm	@lezer/markdown	`1.6.3`	indirect
npm	@marijn/find-cluster-break	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	any-promise	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	anymatch	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	arg	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	binary-extensions	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	camelcase-css	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	crelt	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	didyoumean	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	dlv	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.19.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-binary-path	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`1.21.7`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mini-svg-data-uri	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	mz	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-hash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	pirates	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.25`	indirect
npm	postcss-import	`15.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-js	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-load-config	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	postcss-nested	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.0.10`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	read-cache	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.10`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	style-mod	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	sucrase	`3.35.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	thenify	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	thenify-all	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ts-interface-checker	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	w3c-keyname	`2.2.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.8.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 184 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
ash_phoenix	`2.3.24`	direct	high	4	`2.3.25`
ash_postgres	`2.12.0`	indirect	high	1	`2.13.0`
mint	`1.9.3`	indirect	high	2	`1.10.0`
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
ash	`3.32.3`	direct	moderate	1	`3.33.0`
cowlib	`2.19.0`	indirect	moderate	3	—
yaml	`2.8.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.8.3`
igniter	`0.8.3`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.8.4`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records