Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 20:13 UTC

asteby / metacore-sdk

Official SDK to build metacore addons — Go CLI, TypeScript SDK, React runtime, and 30+ examples

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

asteby/metacore-sdk holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

astebyOrganization
1 follower9 public repossince Oct 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/asteby/metacore-sdkv0.5.0-5113 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume972 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year972
human_commit_share0.53
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag@asteby/metacore-pwa@0.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance835/848 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs835
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d28
prs_decided_30d28
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of asteby
11.1/25Track record9 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginasteby
public_repos9
account_age_days692

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 113 days ago
20/20Version history5 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/asteby/metacore-sdk
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish113

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests20 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscreate-app, fullstack, golang, metacore, monorepo, react, starter-kit, vite
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests20 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno data
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, SAST, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history53 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapexamples/fullstack-starter/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/catalog/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/fiscal_mexico/backend/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingexamples/fiscal-mx/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/fullstack-starter/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/catalog/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/fiscal_mexico/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/orders/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/schedules/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/tickets/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/tickets-addon/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/app-providers/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/billing/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/crud-model/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/full-page/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/minimal/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/tsconfig.json, packages/create-metacore-app/templates/default/tsconfig.json, packages/create-metacore-app/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n/tsconfig.json, packages/lib/tsconfig.json, packages/marketplace/tsconfig.json, packages/notifications/tsconfig.json, packages/pwa/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime-react/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/starter-core/tsconfig.json, packages/starter-monaco/tsconfig.json, packages/theme/tsconfig.json, packages/tools/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/webhooks/tsconfig.json, packages/websocket/tsconfig.json, templates/starter-vite/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsexamples/fiscal-mx/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/fullstack-starter/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/catalog/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/fiscal_mexico/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/orders/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/schedules/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/integrations/tickets/frontend/tsconfig.json, examples/tickets-addon/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/app-providers/tsconfig.json, packages/auth/tsconfig.json, packages/billing/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/crud-model/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/full-page/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/templates/minimal/frontend/tsconfig.json, packages/create-addon/tsconfig.json, packages/create-metacore-app/templates/default/tsconfig.json, packages/create-metacore-app/tsconfig.json, packages/i18n/tsconfig.json, packages/lib/tsconfig.json, packages/marketplace/tsconfig.json, packages/notifications/tsconfig.json, packages/pwa/tsconfig.json, packages/runtime-react/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/starter-core/tsconfig.json, packages/starter-monaco/tsconfig.json, packages/theme/tsconfig.json, packages/tools/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/webhooks/tsconfig.json, packages/websocket/tsconfig.json, templates/starter-vite/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsexamples/fullstack-starter/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/catalog/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/fiscal_mexico/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/orders/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/schedules/backend/go.mod, examples/integrations/tickets/backend/go.mod, go.mod, packages/create-addon/templates/crud-model/backend/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes6/739 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes103,520
source_files_sampled739
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
972commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 20:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests20 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :51:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackaginginternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :51:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
n/aPinned-Dependenciesinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :51:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
n/aSASTinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :51:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-Permissionsinternal error: internal error: invalid GitHub workflow: :51:0: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':' [syntax-check]
0Vulnerabilities76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/asteby/metacore-kernelv0.49.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stripe/stripe-go/v86v86.1.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.