Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-09 10:59 UTC

atc-net / atc-wpf

A common library for WPF components and MVVM programming model

C#MIT★ 11 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined

atc-net/atc-wpf holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (53/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

atc-netOrganization
30 followers41 public repossince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 327 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year327
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv4.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars11
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.4/80Total downloads — 170,542 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAtc.Wpf, Atc.Wpf.Forms, Atc.Wpf.Network, Atc.Wpf.Theming, Atc.Wpf.Controls, Atc.Wpf.Hardware, Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo, Atc.Wpf.FontIcons
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads170,542
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.99
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 197/197 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs197
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.7/25Owner reach — 30 followers of atc-net
23.8/25Track record — 41 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginatc-net
public_repos41
account_age_days2,516

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 145 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAtc.Wpf, Atc.Wpf.Forms, Atc.Wpf.Network, Atc.Wpf.Theming, Atc.Wpf.Controls, Atc.Wpf.Hardware, Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo, Atc.Wpf.FontIcons
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://atc-net.github.io/repository/atc-wpf
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswpf, components-library, controls, csharp, desktop, dotnet, mvvm, windows, xaml
has_wikino
homepagehttps://atc-net.github.io/repository/atc-wpf
docs_sitehttps://atc-net.github.io/repository/atc-wpf
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 19 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,507
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — benchmark/Atc.Wpf.Benchmarks/Atc.Wpf.Benchmarks.csproj, sample/Atc.Wpf.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Sample.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbenchmark/Atc.Wpf.Benchmarks/Atc.Wpf.Benchmarks.csproj, sample/Atc.Wpf.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Sample.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Controls/Atc.Wpf.Controls.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.FontIcons/Atc.Wpf.FontIcons.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Forms/Atc.Wpf.Forms.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Hardware/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Network/Atc.Wpf.Network.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.csproj, src/Atc.Wpf/Atc.Wpf.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Components.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Components.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.FontIcons.Tests/Atc.Wpf.FontIcons.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Forms.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Forms.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Network.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Network.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.Theming.Tests/Atc.Wpf.Theming.Tests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.UiTests/Atc.Wpf.UiTests.csproj, test/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.Tests/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.Tests.csproj, tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 7/1,816 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes422,663
source_files_sampled1,816
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — demos, sample
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, sample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars
3contributors
327commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-09 10:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 41
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin320.3.360src/Atc.Wpf.Components/Atc.Wpf.Components.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample.csproj
NuGetMdXaml1.27.0src/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample/Atc.Wpf.Controls.Sample.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Controls/Atc.Wpf.Controls.csproj
NuGetAtc.UndoRedo1.1.5src/Atc.Wpf.Controls/Atc.Wpf.Controls.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Controls/Atc.Wpf.Controls.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Controls/Atc.Wpf.Controls.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Forms/Atc.Wpf.Forms.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Forms/Atc.Wpf.Forms.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Forms/Atc.Wpf.Forms.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Hardware/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Hardware/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Hardware/Atc.Wpf.Hardware.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Network/Atc.Wpf.Network.csproj
NuGetAtc.Network1.0.236src/Atc.Wpf.Network/Atc.Wpf.Network.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Network/Atc.Wpf.Network.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Network/Atc.Wpf.Network.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj
NuGetControlzEx—src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin320.3.360src/Atc.Wpf.Theming/Atc.Wpf.Theming.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.csproj
NuGetAtc.UndoRedo1.1.5src/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1src/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo/Atc.Wpf.UndoRedo.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186src/Atc.Wpf/Atc.Wpf.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf1.1.161src/Atc.Wpf/Atc.Wpf.csproj
NuGetAtc3.0.186tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetControlzEx7.0.4tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetCssParser1.3.0tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.12tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.12tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.12tool/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources/Atc.Wpf.Generator.FontIconResources.csproj
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 6 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAtc3.0.186direct
NuGetAtc.Network1.0.236direct
NuGetAtc.UndoRedo1.1.5direct
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit3.2.1direct
NuGetAtc.XamlToolkit.Wpf3.2.1direct
NuGetControlzEx—direct
NuGetControlzEx7.0.4direct
NuGetCssParser1.3.0direct
NuGetMdXaml1.27.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.12direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin320.3.360direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Xaml.Behaviors.Wpf1.1.161direct
NuGetAtc.XUnit3.0.186indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8indirect
NuGetFlaUI.Core5.0.0indirect
NuGetFlaUI.UIA35.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.DataAnnotations10.0.12indirect
NuGetXunit.StaFact4.0.24indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 19 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.