Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 05:53 UTC

audiojs / decode

Minimal audio decoders layer

JavaScriptMIT★ 208 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Aug 2016View on GitHub ↗

audiojs/decode holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (26/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

audio.jsOrganization
71 followers71 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@audio/decode3.15.030,086911 days agoaudiodecodedecodercodecmp3wavoggvorbisopusflacaacm4aqoaaiffcafwebmamrwmapcmstreamingmp4movmkvavivideoextractac3dts

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 11 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 119 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year119
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 28 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~25 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv3.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release28
mean_days_between_releases25
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
37.6/60Stars — 208 stars
9.8/25Forks — 16 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks16
stars208
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.7/80Monthly downloads — 30,086 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@audio/decode
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads30,086
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.976
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
18.8/30PR acceptance — 10/16 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues34
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.4/25Owner reach — 71 followers of audiojs
25/25Track record — 71 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers71
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginaudiojs
public_repos71
account_age_days3,755

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 9 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@audio/decode
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaudio, codec, decoder, wav, webassembly
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier32
security_posture_before_jurisdiction43
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages33
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@audio/decode@3.15.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 33 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

26At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.1/40Legible commit history — 32 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.32
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
50.9/55Manageable file sizes — 13/173 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes1,409,393
source_files_sampled173
oversized_source_files13

Key facts

208GitHub stars
6contributors
119commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿
0Stars
16Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04812161612017-052021-072025-08

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 05:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@audio/decode-aac^1.5.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-ac3^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-aiff^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-amr^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-avi^1.1.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-caf^1.4.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-dts^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-flac^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-mp3^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-mp4^1.1.1package.json
npm@audio/decode-opus^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-qoa^1.2.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-vorbis^1.3.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-wav^1.5.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-webm^1.6.1package.json
npm@audio/decode-wma^1.3.0package.json
npmaudio-type^2.7.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-wavpack^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-tta^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-mpc^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-mod^1.0.0package.json
npm@audio/decode-dsd^1.0.0package.json
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@audio/decode-aac1.5.0direct
npm@audio/decode-aac^1.5.0direct
npm@audio/decode-ac31.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-ac3^1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-aiff1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-amr1.3.1direct
npm@audio/decode-amr^1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-avi1.1.0direct
npm@audio/decode-caf1.4.0direct
npm@audio/decode-dsd1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-dts1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-dts^1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-flac1.3.3direct
npm@audio/decode-flac^1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-mod1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-mp31.3.1direct
npm@audio/decode-mp3^1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-mp41.1.1direct
npm@audio/decode-mpc1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-opus1.3.1direct
npm@audio/decode-opus^1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-qoa1.2.0direct
npm@audio/decode-tta1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-vorbis1.3.2direct
npm@audio/decode-vorbis^1.3.0direct
npm@audio/decode-wav1.5.0direct
npm@audio/decode-wavpack1.0.0direct
npm@audio/decode-webm1.6.1direct
npm@audio/decode-wma1.3.1direct
npmaudio-type2.7.0direct
npm@audio/decode3.11.1indirect
npm@audio/decode^3.11.1indirect
npm@audio/decode-ape1.0.0indirect
npm@audio/decode-eac31.0.0indirect
npm@audio/decode-eac3^1.0.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.0indirect
npm@eshaz/web-worker1.2.2indirect
npm@thi.ng/bitstream2.4.44indirect
npm@thi.ng/errors2.6.6indirect
npm@wasm-audio-decoders/common9.0.7indirect
npm@wasm-audio-decoders/flac0.2.10indirect
npm@wasm-audio-decoders/flac~0.2.10indirect
npm@wasm-audio-decoders/ogg-vorbis0.1.20indirect
npm@wasm-audio-decoders/ogg-vorbis~0.1.20indirect
npmaudio-lena3.0.0indirect
npmbase64-arraybuffer1.0.2indirect
npmcodec-parser2.5.0indirect
npmcodec-parser~2.5.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmmpg123-decoder1.0.3indirect
npmmpg123-decoder^1.0.3indirect
npmpackages/audio-decode3.12.0indirect
npmplaywright1.58.2indirect
npmplaywright-core1.58.2indirect
npmqoa-format1.0.1indirect
npmqoa-format^1.0.1indirect
npmsimple-yenc1.0.4indirect
npmtst9.4.0indirect
npmtst^9.2.2indirect
npmtst^9.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@audio/decode@3.15.0 pulls in 33 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.