Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 18:33 UTC

auth0 / auth0-PHP

PHP SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs.

PHPMIT★ 411 stars⑂ 221 forkssince Oct 2013View on GitHub ↗

auth0/auth0-PHP holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (57/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Auth0Organization · verified domain
2,122 followers346 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistauth0/auth0-php9.0.0629,24514127 days agoauthorizationapiopenidauthenticationoauthloginauthsecureprotectjwtjson-web-tokenjwkauth0json-web-key

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 6 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence22/52 weeks with commits
16/18Commit volume60 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year60
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~15.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag9.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases15.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.4/60Stars411 stars
19.5/25Forks221 forks
10.4/15Watchers74 watchers
Inputs used
forks221
stars411
watchers74
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
77.3/80Monthly downloads629,245 downloads/month across packagist
12.3/20Registry dependents70 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesauth0/auth0-php
dependents70
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads23,231,494
monthly_downloads629,245
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth90 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled90
top_contributor_share0.297
How it's scored
41.8/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance524/625 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs524
open_issues1
closed_issues221
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.995
closed_unmerged_prs101
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
23.9/25Owner reach2,122 followers of auth0
25/25Track record346 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,122
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginauth0
public_repos346
account_age_days5,042

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 27 days ago
20/20Version history141 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesauth0/auth0-php
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish27

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://auth0.com/docs/libraries/auth0-php
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdx-sdk, php, auth0
has_wikino
homepagehttps://auth0.com/docs/libraries/auth0-php
docs_sitehttps://auth0.com/docs/libraries/auth0-php
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate7.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://auth0.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history69 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://auth0.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.784
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes2/3,781 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes177,695
source_files_sampled3,781
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplescookbook, examples
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

411GitHub stars
90contributors
60commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 221 ⇿
0Stars
221Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024021652014-022020-052026-08
Major 6Minor 39Patch 44

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10
7.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 18:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests27 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistpsr-discovery/all^1composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client-implementation^1composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-factory^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-factory-implementation^1composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^1.1 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message-implementation^1composer.json
All dependencies 33

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 26 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr-discovery/alldirect
Packagistpsr/http-clientdirect
Packagistpsr/http-client-implementationdirect
Packagistpsr/http-factorydirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory-implementationdirect
Packagistpsr/http-messagedirect
Packagistpsr/http-message-implementationdirect
Packagistauth0/auth0-phpindirect
Packagistcache/filesystem-adapterindirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalizeindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistext-opensslindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzleindirect
Packagistlatte/latteindirect
Packagistmockery/mockeryindirect
Packagistnyholm/psr7indirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-http/discoveryindirect
Packagistphp-http/multipart-stream-builderindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rulesindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsr-mock/httpindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistsymfony/cacheindirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenvindirect
Packagistwikimedia/composer-merge-pluginindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.