Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 13:04 UTC

aws / aws-sdk-ruby

The official AWS SDK for Ruby

RubyApache-2.0★ 3,657 stars⑂ 1,231 forkssince Jul 2011View on GitHub ↗

aws/aws-sdk-ruby holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Amazon Web ServicesOrganization · verified domain
17,202 followers559 public repossince Aug 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsaws-sdk-acm1.112.0-1250 days ago
RubyGemsaws-sdk-aiops1.22.0-230 days ago
RubyGemsaws-partitions1.1296.0-1,2945 days ago
RubyGemsaws-sdk-acmpca1.116.0-1170 days ago
RubyGemsaws-eventstream1.4.0-11504 days ago
RubyGemsaws-sdk-account1.66.0-670 days ago
RubyGemsaws-sdk-amplify1.109.0-1100 days ago
RubyGemsaws-sdk-appconfig1.88.0-880 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 357 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year357
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,159 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.11.632
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,159
mean_days_between_releases1.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

95Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.8/60Stars — 3,657 stars
25/25Forks — 1,231 forks
11.7/15Watchers — 128 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,231
stars3,657
watchers128
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Total downloads — 3,268,141,973 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaws-sdk-acm, aws-sdk-aiops, aws-partitions, aws-sdk-acmpca, aws-eventstream, aws-sdk-account, aws-sdk-amplify, aws-sdk-appconfig
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads3,268,141,973
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.549
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 1,362/1,670 decided PRs merged
5.9/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs1,362
open_issues20
closed_issues1,676
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d21
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs308
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d11
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 17,202 followers of aws
25/25Track record — 559 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers17,202
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginaws
public_repos559
account_age_days5,166

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,294 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaws-sdk-acm, aws-sdk-aiops, aws-partitions, aws-sdk-acmpca, aws-eventstream, aws-sdk-account, aws-sdk-amplify, aws-sdk-appconfig
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-ruby/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaws-sdk, ruby, cloud, aws
has_wikino
homepagehttps://aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-ruby/
docs_sitehttps://aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-ruby/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

81Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages35
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 11 resolved dependencies against OSV. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
13.5/40Legible commit history — 24 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.253
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
48.1/55Manageable file sizes — 967/7,671 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes5,083,507
source_files_sampled7,671
oversized_source_files967
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, sample
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, sample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,657GitHub stars
99contributors
357commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
20open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,231 ⇿
0Stars
1,231Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

02505007501,0001,2501,231102013-092020-032026-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 100

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10
7.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 13:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 12/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
8Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-crt—Gemfile
RubyGemsbase64—Gemfile
RubyGemsbigdecimal—Gemfile
RubyGemscsv—Gemfile
RubyGemshttp-2—Gemfile
RubyGemsjmespath—Gemfile
RubyGemsirb< 1.17.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc< 8.0.0Gemfile
RubyGemsjruby-openssl—Gemfile
RubyGemsirb—Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc—Gemfile
RubyGemsjson—Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri—Gemfile
RubyGemsoga—Gemfile
RubyGemsrexml—Gemfile
RubyGemsruby-ll2.1.3Gemfile
RubyGemslibxml-ruby—Gemfile
RubyGemsoj—Gemfile
RubyGemsox—Gemfile
RubyGemsmemory_profiler—Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk-cloudwatch—Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk-lambda—Gemfile
RubyGemsaws-sdk-s3—Gemfile
RubyGemskramdown—Gemfile
RubyGemsmustache< 1.1.3Gemfile
RubyGemsrdiscount—Gemfile
RubyGemsyard>= 0.9.26Gemfile
RubyGemsyard-sitemap~> 1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrbs—Gemfile
RubyGemspry—Gemfile
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 36 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsaws-sdk-cloudwatch—direct
RubyGemsaws-sdk-lambda—direct
RubyGemsaws-sdk-s3—direct
RubyGemsbase64—direct
RubyGemsbase640.3.0direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal—direct
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.3direct
RubyGemscsv—direct
RubyGemshttp-2—direct
RubyGemsirb—direct
RubyGemsjmespath—direct
RubyGemsjmespath1.6.2direct
RubyGemsjruby-openssl—direct
RubyGemsjson—direct
RubyGemskramdown—direct
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2direct
RubyGemslibxml-ruby—direct
RubyGemsmemory_profiler—direct
RubyGemsmustache—direct
RubyGemsmustache1.1.2direct
RubyGemsnokogiri—direct
RubyGemsoga—direct
RubyGemsoj—direct
RubyGemsoj3.17.7direct
RubyGemsox—direct
RubyGemsox2.14.29direct
RubyGemspry—direct
RubyGemsrake—direct
RubyGemsrbs—direct
RubyGemsrdiscount—direct
RubyGemsrdoc—direct
RubyGemsrexml—direct
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4direct
RubyGemsruby-ll2.1.3direct
RubyGemsyard—direct
RubyGemsyard-sitemap—direct
RubyGemsaddressable—indirect
RubyGemsbyebug—indirect
RubyGemscucumber—indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post—indirect
RubyGemsopentelemetry-sdk—indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrspec—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop—indirect
RubyGemswebmock—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 11 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.